Airline Archives - Aviation Today

New Delhi, India: India’s aviation safety oversight framework will come under international scrutiny later this year as the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) prepares to assess the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) under its International Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) programme in November. The review assumes heightened significance following a turbulent period for Indian aviation, marked by a series of operational disruptions, infrastructure failures and fatal accidents that have triggered concerns over the effectiveness of regulatory oversight in one of the world’s fastest-growing aviation markets. According to reports, the FAA assessment will examine whether the DGCA continues to meet international safety oversight standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The audit focuses on the capabilities of the regulator rather than the performance of individual airlines. The upcoming review follows what industry observers have described as one of the most challenging periods for Indian aviation in recent decades. Among the major events cited are the fatal Air India Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad, multiple helicopter accidents in Uttarakhand, a significant failure of Delhi’s air traffic control systems and the widespread operational disruption experienced by IndiGo in December 2025. The IndiGo disruption, one of the largest airline operational failures witnessed in India, resulted in the cancellation of 2,507 flights and delays to 1,852 services over a three-day period, affecting more than 300,000 passengers nationwide. A DGCA-appointed committee later identified over-optimisation of operations, inadequate regulatory preparedness, software deficiencies and shortcomings in management control as key contributing factors. The FAA review is particularly important because India currently holds Category 1 status under the IASA programme, allowing Indian carriers to operate and expand services to the United States. Retaining that rating is critical for airlines pursuing long-haul growth strategies, including Air India and IndiGo, both of which have announced ambitious international expansion plans. A downgrade could restrict Indian airlines from launching new services or increasing frequencies to the United States until deficiencies are corrected. India previously experienced such a setback in 2014 when the FAA downgraded the country’s safety rating over concerns related to regulatory staffing and oversight capability. The rating was restored after corrective measures were implemented. Government officials have publicly expressed confidence that India will retain its current status. However, industry experts note that the FAA assessment will take place against the backdrop of rapid aviation growth that has significantly increased demands on the regulator. India is currently among the fastest-expanding aviation markets globally, with airlines placing record aircraft orders and passenger traffic continuing to grow. This expansion has intensified concerns regarding inspector availability, surveillance capacity, technical expertise and the regulator’s ability to effectively oversee an increasingly complex aviation ecosystem. Recognising these challenges, the DGCA has initiated a series of corrective measures over the past year. These include enhanced surveillance activities, special safety audits, inspections of airlines and maintenance organisations, and stricter monitoring of airfield operators. Recently, the regulator directed operators of uncontrolled airstrips across the country to immediately review operational conditions and rectify any deficiencies affecting safety. The FAA’s assessment will evaluate multiple elements of India’s aviation oversight system, including aviation legislation, regulatory frameworks, personnel qualifications, technical guidance, certification processes, surveillance programmes and the resolution of safety concerns. The review will determine whether the DGCA possesses the resources, expertise and authority necessary to ensure compliance with international aviation safety standards. The outcome of the November review is expected to be closely watched by airlines, aircraft manufacturers, lessors and international aviation stakeholders. Beyond its immediate impact on air services between India and the United States, the assessment is widely viewed as a test of the strength and maturity of India’s aviation regulatory framework at a time when the country is positioning itself as a major global aviation hub.

FAA To Assess India’s DGCA Under Aviation Safety Oversight Review In November

Aviation Today News Desk / June 24, 2026

New Delhi, India: India’s aviation safety oversight framework will come under international scrutiny later this year as the United States […]

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: A Singapore Airlines (SIA) flight from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore was delayed by nearly six hours on June 21 after the aircraft operating an earlier sector suffered a tyre-related incident upon arrival in Malaysia, marking the second such occurrence involving the same route this month. According to Singapore Airlines, two tyres on a Boeing 737-8 operating Flight SQ114 from Singapore to Kuala Lumpur deflated after landing at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) on June 21. The incident occurred after the aircraft had completed its arrival into Kuala Lumpur. There were no reports of injuries. Because the aircraft could not continue normal operations, it was towed to a remote parking bay. All 152 passengers and eight crew members onboard SQ114 disembarked via buses and were transported to the terminal. The affected aircraft had been scheduled to operate the return service, Flight SQ113, from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore later the same day. However, the tyre damage rendered the aircraft unavailable, forcing Singapore Airlines to dispatch a replacement aircraft from Singapore. As a result, SQ113, carrying 143 passengers and eight crew members, departed Kuala Lumpur at 8:27 p.m. local time instead of its scheduled 2:35 p.m. departure. The flight subsequently arrived in Singapore at 9:38 p.m. Passengers received multiple delay notifications throughout the afternoon. According to reports, the airline initially advised travelers that the departure had been postponed until 4:35 p.m. due to technical issues affecting the incoming aircraft. The flight was later delayed again, with Singapore Airlines citing adverse weather conditions in Singapore for the final postponement. Affected passengers were provided with refreshments, snack packs, meal vouchers and assistance with onward travel arrangements, including rebooking of connecting flights where necessary. Singapore Airlines apologized for the disruption, stating that passenger and crew safety remains its highest priority. The airline also confirmed that the damaged tyres had been replaced and that the aircraft would return to service after the necessary maintenance actions. The June 21 occurrence follows another tyre-related incident involving the same Singapore-Kuala Lumpur service on June 13. On that occasion, Flight SQ114, also operated by a Boeing 737 MAX 8, experienced a double tyre burst during landing at KLIA at approximately 1:27 p.m. local time. The aircraft became disabled on the runway, prompting airport authorities to temporarily close one of KLIA's three runways. The affected runway remained unavailable for about six hours while emergency crews and maintenance personnel worked to clear the aircraft and inspect the pavement. Malaysia Airports later confirmed that flight operations resumed after aviation authorities completed safety checks and granted clearance for reopening. Investigations and technical assessments are expected to determine whether the tyre failures resulted from operational factors, runway conditions, foreign object debris, maintenance issues, manufacturing defects or other causes.

Incidents

Singapore Airlines Flight Delayed For Hours After Two Tyres Deflated At KLIA

Aviation Today News Desk / June 24, 2026

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: A Singapore Airlines (SIA) flight from Kuala Lumpur to Singapore was delayed by nearly six hours on

London, United Kingdom: British low-cost carrier easyJet has rejected a third takeover proposal from the U.S.-based investment firm Castlelake, prompting the investor to take its bid public days before a regulatory deadline that could determine whether a formal offer materializes. Castlelake's latest proposal values easyJet at approximately £4.7 billion ($6.3 billion), offering shareholders 625 pence per share in cash. The airline's board unanimously rejected the approach, describing it as "highly opportunistic" and stating that it "fundamentally undervalues easyJet and its medium-term prospects." The public disclosure marks a significant escalation in the takeover battle after weeks of private discussions and rejected proposals. According to documents released by both parties, Castlelake initially approached easyJet with a non-binding proposal of 560 pence per share. After that offer was rejected, the investment firm returned with a second proposal at 600 pence per share before ultimately increasing its offer to 625 pence per share. The latest proposal was submitted on June 20 and rejected by easyJet's board on June 21. Castlelake said it decided to go public because the airline had repeatedly declined to engage meaningfully with the firm despite multiple approaches. The company stated that the third proposal represented a substantial premium to easyJet's market value before takeover speculation emerged, arguing that shareholders should be given the opportunity to consider the proposal. In its response, easyJet said the proposal arrived during a period when the airline sector was facing temporary pressures linked to geopolitical instability and rising fuel costs. The board said, "It believes that the proposal is highly opportunistic and fundamentally undervalues easyJet and its medium-term prospects." The airline added that Castlelake's valuation relied heavily on short-term market conditions rather than the company's long-term earnings potential, strategic position, asset base and growth plans. Directors also raised concerns regarding what they described as an opaque acquisition structure, uncertainties surrounding future financing arrangements and questions about regulatory implementation. The board concluded that accepting the proposal would not be in the best interests of shareholders. Castlelake's proposal is structured as an all-cash offer for easyJet shares. The firm also included a partial alternative under which shareholders could elect to receive unlisted, non-transferable and non-voting equity interests in a Castlelake-controlled acquisition vehicle instead of cash for a portion of their holdings. According to disclosures, the proposed ownership structure would consist of: • 49% ownership by Castlelake funds. • 51% ownership by European Union nationals and other investors. The structure was designed to satisfy European airline ownership regulations, which require EU airlines to remain majority owned and controlled by EU interests. To achieve compliance, Castlelake partnered with former easyJet Chief Operating Officer Peter Bellew and aerospace executive Mark Breen, who would participate in the EU-controlled ownership arrangement. The investment firm said the structure had been specifically designed to preserve easyJet's European operating rights and regulatory approvals. easyJet, however, expressed reservations about the proposed arrangement. The airline said the structure lacked transparency and created uncertainty over who would ultimately exercise control over the carrier. The board also questioned how the ownership model would operate in practice and whether it would satisfy regulatory requirements across the jurisdictions in which easyJet operates. Castlelake rejected those concerns and said its proposal was fully compliant with applicable regulations. The investment firm stated that it had no intention of dismantling easyJet's operations and instead sought to support future growth. Castlelake said the proposed acquisition would be funded through a combination of equity and debt financing. The company disclosed that Goldman Sachs had indicated its ability to arrange the required debt facilities. The firm added that the proposal was expected to be fully funded if a formal offer proceeded. Castlelake currently manages approximately $36 billion to $38 billion in assets globally and has extensive experience investing in aviation-related businesses. Its previous aviation investments have included Scandinavian Airlines (SAS), while it has also explored opportunities involving U.S.-based carriers. Under the UK Takeover Code, Castlelake has until 5:00 p.m. on June 26, 2026, to either: • Announce a firm intention to make an offer for easyJet; or • Confirm that it does not intend to proceed. Any extension would require approval from the UK Takeover Panel. As of the latest disclosures, Castlelake stressed that no formal offer had yet been made and that there remained no certainty a definitive bid would ultimately emerge. Several major shareholders appear unconvinced that the current offer adequately reflects easyJet's value. According to reports, investors believe meaningful engagement would likely require a proposal of at least 700 pence per share, implying a valuation exceeding £5.3 billion. That figure would be roughly £600 million higher than Castlelake's current proposal. Investors point to easyJet's extensive aircraft fleet, valuable airport slots, strong balance sheet and rapidly expanding holidays division as reasons the airline should command a higher valuation. The airline has repeatedly highlighted its medium-term growth plans as justification for rejecting the proposal. easyJet believes investments in newer, more fuel-efficient aircraft, operational improvements and expansion of its holidays business could support significantly higher profitability in coming years. The company has previously outlined ambitions to generate annual profits approaching £1 billion over the longer term. Management argues that the current proposal fails to capture the value of those future earnings opportunities. Market attention has increasingly focused on easyJet founder Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, whose family retains approximately a 15% shareholding in the airline. While Castlelake's proposal includes mechanisms that could appeal to long-term investors, Haji-Ioannou has not publicly indicated whether he supports or opposes the bid. For now, easyJet's board remains firmly opposed to the proposal, maintaining that the airline's long-term value, growth prospects and strategic position justify a substantially higher valuation than the one currently on the table.

Airlines

EasyJet Rejects Third £4.7 Billion Takeover Bid From US Based Castlelake Firm

Aviation Today News Desk / June 23, 2026

London, United Kingdom: British low-cost carrier easyJet has rejected a third takeover proposal from the U.S.-based investment firm Castlelake, prompting

Hokkaido, Japan: A Tigerair Taiwan passenger aircraft operating a scheduled international flight from Taipei to Japan carried out an emergency diversion and landed safely at New Chitose Airport in Hokkaido after the crew received a smoke-related warning during flight. The aircraft, an Airbus A320 operating as Flight IT234, was en route from Taipei Taoyuan International Airport (TPE) to Sapporo’s New Chitose Airport (CTS) when cockpit systems indicated a potential smoke alert during the descent phase into Japanese airspace. The flight crew immediately initiated standard emergency procedures after receiving the warning indication. The pilots declared an emergency with Japanese air traffic control and requested priority landing at the nearest suitable airport. New Chitose Airport, a major international gateway in northern Japan, was selected as the diversion airport due to its proximity and full emergency handling capability. Emergency services at the airport were placed on standby as the aircraft approached, in line with standard aviation safety protocols for smoke-related alerts onboard commercial aircraft. The aircraft landed safely without further escalation of the situation. No injuries were reported among the approximately 179 passengers and crew members onboard. After landing, the aircraft was guided to a safe parking stand where passengers disembarked normally. Airport operations were briefly adjusted, with precautionary monitoring in place until the situation was fully stabilized. Initial reports described the incident as a “smoke warning” originating from the aircraft’s electronic or avionics compartment. However, early clarifications suggest there was no confirmed onboard fire or visible smoke in the cabin. The aircraft has been secured for technical inspection, and the cause of the warning remains under investigation.

Incidents

Tigerair Taiwan Flight IT234 Makes Emergency Landing In Hokkaido After Smoke Warning

Aviation Today News Desk / June 13, 2026

Hokkaido, Japan: A Tigerair Taiwan passenger aircraft operating a scheduled international flight from Taipei to Japan carried out an emergency

Washington, United States: A United Airlines Boeing 737-900 operating a scheduled domestic flight was forced to return to Washington Dulles International Airport after the flight crew reported a nose landing gear issue shortly after departure. The incident involved United Airlines Flight 1535, which departed Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) for Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH) on June 9, 2026. According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the aircraft returned safely to Dulles after pilots reported a problem involving the nose landing gear. FAA officials said the Boeing 737-900 landed safely at approximately 2:05 p.m. local time and confirmed that the agency will investigate the occurrence. Flight tracking data showed that the aircraft departed Dulles at approximately 12:57 p.m. local time and remained airborne for more than an hour before returning to the airport. United Airlines confirmed that the aircraft returned to Washington Dulles as a precaution to address the issue. “The flight returned safely to the airport to address the issue, and we made arrangements to get customers to their destinations,” the airline said in a statement. Emergency response teams were positioned as a precaution when the aircraft arrived back at the airport. The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority confirmed that its fire and rescue personnel met the aircraft upon landing. The aircraft landed without incident and subsequently taxied to the gate under its own power. Airport officials stated that the emergency return did not affect normal airport operations and that no injuries were reported among passengers or crew. To minimize disruption, United arranged alternative travel options for affected passengers. Flight records indicate that another flight later departed Washington Dulles for Houston and completed the journey successfully. The aircraft involved was a Boeing 737-900, one of the largest variants of the 737 Next Generation family widely used on domestic routes throughout the United States. The FAA investigation is expected to determine the precise cause of the reported nose landing gear issue and whether any mechanical, maintenance, or operational factors contributed to the event.

Incidents

United Airlines Boeing 737 Returns To Washington Dulles After Nose Landing Gear Issue

Aviation Today News Desk / June 12, 2026

Washington, United States: A United Airlines Boeing 737-900 operating a scheduled domestic flight was forced to return to Washington Dulles

New Delhi, India: Thousands of aviation employees at SpiceJet, including a significant number of pilots, continue to face salary delays stretching back several months as the financially troubled airline seeks emergency government-backed funding to stabilize operations and restore cash flow. According to internal communications reviewed by Reuters, many SpiceJet pilots have not received full salary payments since March 2026, highlighting the severity of the airline's ongoing liquidity challenges. The issue has sparked growing concerns among employees, some of whom reportedly struggle to meet daily expenses and financial commitments. SpiceJet employed approximately 375 pilots as of March 2026, and internal discussions reviewed by Reuters indicate that salary payments have remained pending for several months for many of them. Communications from a pilots' WhatsApp group involving more than 180 members revealed growing frustration over delayed wages. In one message dated May 26, SpiceJet's Senior Vice President of Flight Operations, Virendra Malhotra, acknowledged the difficulties faced by employees due to delayed salary disbursements and indicated that the remaining portion of February salaries would be released shortly. Pilots subsequently sought clarity regarding payments for March, April, and May salaries, which remained outstanding at the time. Several employees reportedly stated that delayed payments had created financial hardship, forcing some to seek assistance from family members and friends to manage essential expenses. SpiceJet acknowledged that salary disbursements had been delayed but stated that employee payments were being released in phases. According to the airline, a majority of employees had already received March salaries, while efforts continued to clear outstanding dues. The carrier maintained that employee payments remained a priority and that all obligations would be honored. As it attempts to navigate the crisis, SpiceJet is actively pursuing funding under India's Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme (ECLGS). The government-backed program allows eligible airlines to access seven-year guaranteed loans of up to ₹1,500 crore ($157.2 million USD). Reports also indicate that SpiceJet has sought additional funding of approximately ₹2,000 crore ($210 million USD) under the scheme as it attempts to strengthen liquidity and support day-to-day operations. The airline said it expects business conditions to normalize over the coming months and described the funding effort as part of broader measures aimed at restoring operational stability. SpiceJet's current financial stress stems from a combination of long-term and recent challenges. The airline was India's second-largest domestic carrier in 2019, commanding roughly 15% of the market. However, its market share has since declined dramatically to approximately 3.4%, placing it fourth among Indian airlines.. The airline has reported annual losses almost every year since 2019, with the exception of FY2024-25, when it posted a small profit largely driven by one-time gains from settlements with aircraft lessors. SpiceJet currently operates an active fleet of approximately 21 aircraft. The carrier declined scheduled flights from 4,494 flights in January 2026 to 3,053 flights in May 2026, according to aviation analytics firm OAG. The airline's financial struggles have also weighed heavily on investor confidence, with its share price reportedly falling around 60% during 2026. At least two aircraft lessors have reportedly issued payment default notices to the airline this year, reflecting continuing concerns about its financial position. Despite the challenges, SpiceJet has taken steps to expand available capacity. The airline recently returned a Boeing 737 MAX aircraft to commercial service and finalized lease arrangements for three Airbus A320 aircraft scheduled to join the fleet in July. Management says the additional aircraft are intended to help meet passenger demand and support operational recovery.

Airlines

SpiceJet Employees Face Months Of Salary Delays As Airline Seeks Emergency Funding

Aviation Today News Desk / June 12, 2026

New Delhi, India: Thousands of aviation employees at SpiceJet, including a significant number of pilots, continue to face salary delays

Lagos, Nigeria: The Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) has grounded a privately operated aircraft and suspended the operator's Permit for Non-Commercial Flight (PNCF) after the aircraft conducted an unauthorized flight to Lagos following an emergency landing near Asaba in Delta State. The aircraft involved was a Canadair CL-600-2B16 Challenger 601-3A, registration N989BC, owned and operated by Best Aircraft Deals LLC. The regulator announced the enforcement action in a statement issued on Wednesday by Director of Public Affairs and Consumer Protection Michael Achimugu, who confirmed that a full investigation has been launched into the occurrence. According to preliminary information released by the NCAA, the aircraft was attempting to land at Asaba Airport when the crew executed a missed approach at approximately 7:43 a.m. local time. The aircraft subsequently carried out an emergency landing on a roadway in the Ogwashi-Uku area, outside the airport environment. Authorities reported that all four crew members on board safely evacuated the aircraft after landing. No injuries were recorded, and the occupants were later transported to Asaba by road. While the emergency landing itself ended without casualties, the NCAA's concerns intensified after learning that the aircraft later departed the scene and flew to Lagos without obtaining the required regulatory authorization. According to the regulator, preliminary findings indicate that the aircraft took off from the location at approximately 11:02 GMT and returned to Lagos without prior approval from the authority. The NCAA further stated that Air Traffic Control was reportedly notified only after the aircraft had already become airborne. The authority described the action as a potential violation of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Regulations and immediately grounded the aircraft upon its arrival in Lagos pending the outcome of ongoing investigations. In addition, the flight crew has been placed under regulatory review while investigators examine the circumstances surrounding both the emergency landing and the subsequent unauthorized flight. As part of the enforcement measures, the NCAA suspended the operator's Permit for Non-Commercial Flight and ordered a comprehensive review of all operational, maintenance, airworthiness and flight-related records associated with the aircraft and operator. The authority has also notified the Nigerian Safety Investigation Bureau (NSIB) and is coordinating with the Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA) and other aviation stakeholders to establish the full sequence of events. The regulator stated that the actions were necessary to preserve aviation safety and ensure compliance with established operational procedures while the investigation remains underway.

Incidents

NCAA Grounds Aircraft After Unauthorized Flight Following Emergency Landing Near Asaba

Aviation Today News Desk / June 11, 2026

Lagos, Nigeria: The Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) has grounded a privately operated aircraft and suspended the operator’s Permit for

Emirates

Emirates’ President Says European Airlines Shouldn’t Bet On Gulf Carrier Weakness

Aviation Today News Desk / June 10, 2026

Berlin, Germany: Emirates President Sir Tim Clark has declared that the Dubai-based carrier will rebound “hard and fast” from the

United Kingdom

UK Considers Nationwide No-Fly List For Abusive And Disruptive Airline Passengers

Aviation Today News Desk / June 2, 2026

London, United Kingdom: The United Kingdom government is considering the introduction of a nationwide system that could prevent disruptive airline

Abuja, Nigeria: Nigeria’s domestic aviation sector has entered a fresh regulatory dispute after the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) placed 11 airlines on a “No-Pay-No-Service” list over alleged unpaid statutory obligations, prompting strong denials from airline operators and raising concerns over potential operational disruptions across the country. The directive, contained in an internal NCAA memo dated May 22, 2026, instructed all directorates and regional offices of the regulator not to provide services to affected airlines without clearance from the Directorate of Finance and Accounts. The memo was signed by Olufemi Odukoya, NCAA’s Director of Finance and Accounts, and copied to the Director-General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), Capt. Chris Najomo, along with senior officials within the authority. The airlines named in the updated “No-Pay-No-Service” list are: Air Peace Ibom Air Arik Air United Nigeria Airlines Umza Air NG Eagle Max Air Caverton Helicopters Overland Airways Rano Air ValueJet According to the memo, “no directorate should render any service to the above airlines without financial clearance from the Director of Finance and Accounts.” The NCAA argued that the move was necessary because airlines had failed to meet outstanding financial obligations owed to the regulator. At the center of the dispute are the statutory five percent Ticket Sales Charge (TSC) and Cargo Sales Charge (CSC), levies collected by airlines on behalf of the NCAA from passengers and cargo operators. The regulator relies heavily on these remittances to fund safety oversight, inspections, personnel obligations, economic regulation and other administrative responsibilities within Nigeria’s aviation sector. However, the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON), representing domestic carriers, rejected the allegations and described reports suggesting airlines were indebted to the NCAA as inaccurate. According to the operators, many NCAA services are already paid for in advance under a “cash-before-service” arrangement, making the regulator’s characterization misleading. The airlines reportedly argued that the disputed amounts relate mainly to the Ticket Sales Charge collection system rather than direct service debts. Industry operators also renewed calls for reforms to Nigeria’s aviation charging structure, urging the government to amend regulations so the NCAA can collect the five percent TSC directly from passengers instead of routing collections through airlines. Carriers argue that the current system exposes them to banking charges, reconciliation complications and financial pressure amid rising operational costs. The latest dispute comes during a difficult financial period for Nigerian airlines, which continue to face mounting economic challenges driven by soaring Jet A1 fuel prices, foreign exchange shortages, high maintenance expenses, airport charges and weak profit margins. In April 2026, domestic carriers had warned of possible operational shutdowns due to escalating fuel costs and debt burdens. Following negotiations with airline operators, Nigerian President Bola Tinubu approved, in principle, a 30 percent reduction or write-off of debts owed by airlines to aviation agencies as part of broader relief measures aimed at stabilizing the sector. The ICIR reported that Tinubu approved the debt relief initiative on April 23, 2026, though implementation had not commenced as of late May. Explaining the delay, NCAA Director-General Capt. Chris Najomo stated that the process required consultations with airlines and aviation agencies before execution. Another aviation consultant, Adeola Fadairo, defended the NCAA’s action, arguing that the Ticket Sales Charge belongs to the regulator and should not be retained by airlines to offset operational shortfalls. He described non-remittance of statutory levies as a serious breach of public trust and corporate responsibility. Meanwhile, United Nigeria Airlines confirmed it had opened discussions with the NCAA regarding the matter, while several other affected airlines had not publicly commented at the time of reporting. However, the NCAA later suspended enforcement of the “No-Pay-No-Service” directive following industry backlash and concerns that the move could disrupt airline operations, licensing processes and other regulatory services. The regulator said the temporary relief would allow further consultations with airlines and aviation stakeholders over the disputed Ticket Sales Charges and outstanding obligations.

Airlines

NCAA Temporarily Rolls Back “No-Pay-No-Service” Directive Following Airlines Pushback

Aviation Today News Desk / May 26, 2026

Abuja, Nigeria: Nigeria’s domestic aviation sector has entered a fresh regulatory dispute after the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) placed

Airline

FAA To Assess India’s DGCA Under Aviation Safety Oversight Review In November

Singapore Airlines Flight Delayed For Hours After Two Tyres Deflated At KLIA

EasyJet Rejects Third £4.7 Billion Takeover Bid From US Based Castlelake Firm

Tigerair Taiwan Flight IT234 Makes Emergency Landing In Hokkaido After Smoke Warning

United Airlines Boeing 737 Returns To Washington Dulles After Nose Landing Gear Issue

SpiceJet Employees Face Months Of Salary Delays As Airline Seeks Emergency Funding

NCAA Grounds Aircraft After Unauthorized Flight Following Emergency Landing Near Asaba

Emirates’ President Says European Airlines Shouldn’t Bet On Gulf Carrier Weakness

UK Considers Nationwide No-Fly List For Abusive And Disruptive Airline Passengers

NCAA Temporarily Rolls Back “No-Pay-No-Service” Directive Following Airlines Pushback

Follow Us

Quick Links

Navigate

General Support

News Desk Support

Follow Us