Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

Just In

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa
Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA
JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026
Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering
NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope’s Orbit
US Seeks Transparency On Airbus Loan Amid Risks To Aircraft Financing Truce With EU
Embraer Reports Record $35.7 Billion Backlog In Q3 2026 As Defence Orders Rise 56%
European Pilot Survey Flags Fatigue, Fear Of Repercussions And Weak Reporting Systems
Philippine Air Force Grounds SF-260 Fleet After After Mid-Air Collision Kills Four
Three Killed In Small Aircraft Crash Near Colorado’s Remote Swampy Pass Wilderness Area

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope’s Orbit

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope’s Orbit

Latest Breaking News & Developments

Latest Breaking News & Developments

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

Investigation

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

Posted onOctober 28, 2026October 28, 2026

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

Airlines

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

Posted onOctober 28, 2026October 28, 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

Airlines

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

Posted onOctober 27, 2026October 27, 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Airlines

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Posted onOctober 27, 2026October 27, 2026

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope’s Orbit

Space

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope’s Orbit

Posted onOctober 27, 2026October 27, 2026

Read More Stories

Aviation Today Perspectives

A hard look at the system behind the licence before speed and hype define the future of Indian aviation. India is producing pilots at a pace the country has never seen before. This is a positive development. A large and growing airline market needs trained professionals, and a nation with India’s aviation ambition cannot remain dependent on foreign flight schools forever. But growth is not maturity. The real question before Indian aviation is not whether we can produce pilots faster. It is whether we are building a pilot-training system strong enough to produce them safely, consistently and honestly. By 30 June 2026, India had issued 1,331 Commercial Pilot Licences. Of these, 540, or 41 percent, were issued to cadets trained outside India. This tells us two things at once: demand is real, and domestic capacity still has substantial work to do. The country is expanding its FTO network, aircraft fleet and cadet intake. Yet the system cannot measure its success only by licences issued, aircraft inducted or advertisements released. A CPL is not the finish line. It is the beginning of professional formation. The dangerous language of fast track flying: The most worrying development in pilot training is not ambition. It is the language surrounding ambition: fast-track CPL, airline pilot in record time, guaranteed placement, finish early, fly early, earn early. Such promises may attract students, but they can quietly distort the purpose of training. Aviation is not a product that becomes better because it is delivered faster. A student pilot is not a customer moving through a production line. Flying competence takes time: time to make errors under supervision, time to develop judgement, time to understand weather, time to learn restraint, and time to build respect for procedures. An industry built around the fastest possible licence will eventually face the consequences of the slowest-developing element in aviation: judgement. There is nothing wrong with efficient training. There is everything wrong with training efficiency becoming a commercial pressure that competes with operational discipline. A cadet should never feel that a delay caused by weather, maintenance, instructor assessment or a failed standard is an injustice. In aviation, delay is often the system protecting the student. The truth must be stated without hesitation: no FTO can ethically guarantee an airline job. It can guarantee transparent training, good instruction, aircraft availability, fair standards, honest counselling and employability support. It cannot guarantee the airline market, medical fitness, individual performance, type-rating outcomes or future hiring cycles. “A licence may be promised. A career cannot.” Safety must be a value not a priority: A priority can change with the day’s pressure. It can move when a target is missed, an aircraft is unavailable, admissions slow down or an investor asks difficult questions. A value does not move. This distinction is at the heart of India’s present training challenge. When safety is treated as a priority, it may be pushed aside in the name of utilisation, student completion, revenue or reputation. When safety is treated as a value, every decision dispatch, weather, fuel, aircraft serviceability, instructor release, solo authorisation, continuation or diversion must pass through it. The record of accidents and serious incidents is not an argument against flight training. Flying training will always involve risk because it is where people learn to manage aircraft, weather, workload and error. But the record must force us to ask better questions. In one final investigation report, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau reviewed ten years of FTO accidents through December 2022 and recorded 28 accidents, including 10 involving fatalities. IMAGEEEEEEEEEE : PG 33 GRAPH It identified repeated themes: deviation from standard procedures, unauthorised activity, low flying, operations below visual conditions, incorrect take-off and landing patterns, weak supervision and shortcomings in safety culture. These are not merely technical failures. They are organisational warnings. The lesson is not that every accident has one cause or that every FTO is unsafe. Investigation must never be used to apportion blame before facts are established. The lesson is that a system cannot market speed and scale while treating safety reporting, instructor standardisation, maintenance discipline and independent oversight as paperwork. Every FTO should be able to answer simple questions with evidence: How many unstable approaches were discontinued? How many weather-related no-go decisions were supported by management? How many maintenance defects were reported, repeated and permanently rectified? How are instructors standardised, checked and supervised? What hazards are reported voluntarily, and what corrective action follows? How is student pressure identified before it becomes unsafe decision-making? If these answers are not visible inside the organisation, safety is probably being managed as a document, not lived as a value. The overseas training question: The 41 percent overseas share is not proof that Indian training is inferior. It is proof that Indian students are making practical choices in response to capacity, aircraft availability, weather, timelines, perceived quality, international exposure and confidence in completion schedules. Foreign training can offer advantages: reliable flying weather in some regions, larger fleets, established training systems, exposure to controlled airspace and a more predictable training calendar. But it also brings conversion complexity, regulatory differences and the challenge of adapting back to Indian airspace, procedures and airline expectations. India should not respond by criticising foreign training. It should respond by becoming the more dependable option. That means Indian FTOs must compete on quality of outcomes, not merely on lower advertised fees or shorter timelines. The goal should be a mature domestic system where training is transparent, safe, professionally supervised and globally credible. Why MPL should wait? The Multi-Crew Pilot Licence is not inherently unsafe. Properly designed, it is a sophisticated, competency-based airline pathway. ICAO introduced MPL provisions in 2006, and EASA’s Part-FCL framework has developed detailed requirements around it for years. But MPL is not simply a cheaper CPL with more simulator hours. It requires a tightly controlled ecosystem: a genuine and continuing airline-ATO relationship; validated competency standards; high-fidelity, well-supervised simulation; instructors with substantial multi-crew operational experience; calibrated assessors; robust data monitoring; transparent safeguards; and an airline culture capable of taking responsibility for the cadet from selection through line operations. EASA’s framework recognises this depth. MPL is linked to structured ATO–operator arrangements and instructor requirements rooted in multi-pilot experience and crew-resource-management competence. This is not an off-the-shelf programme to be inserted into a fragmented training market. India should therefore resist any hurried, mass-market MPL rollout for at least the next decade. This is not opposition to innovation. It is respect for sequencing. Before MPL is introduced at scale, India should first demonstrate: A stable and independently audited FTO oversight system. Stronger instructor training, standardisation and recurrent-checking systems. Mandatory safety-management systems that produce usable, protected occurrence data. Clear national standards for simulator qualification, availability, fidelity and data capture. Airline-linked MPL programmes where the airline, not merely the student, holds genuine responsibility for the training outcome. Public reporting of completion rates, washout rates, safety events, instructor ratios and post training performance. A regulatory workforce with the capacity to supervise competency-based programmes continuously, not only approve them on paper. “MPL may become right for India. But it will become right only when India is ready to regulate it as an airline-integrated safety system, not as another commercial shortcut.” The choice before Indian aviation: “India does not need fewer pilots. It needs better-developed pilots, better-supported instructors, better-governed FTOs and more mature oversight.” The next decade should not be about producing the largest number of CPLs. It should be about building the most trustworthy pilot-development system in the region. The aviation industry must reject the culture of hype. It must stop selling certainty where none exists. It must stop treating time as the only measure of success. A pilot is not produced when the logbook reaches a number. A pilot is formed when competence, judgment, humility, discipline and safety values become stronger than commercial pressure. India has the demand. It has talent. It has the opportunity. Now it must prove that its rules, institutions and mindset can mature at the same speed as its ambition. National Pilot Training Agenda & Flight Training Bharat Standards: The National Pilot Training Maturity Agenda can be advanced through Flight Training Bharat Standards: an industry-led, voluntary benchmark designed to complement DGCA requirements, not replace regulatory approval, surveillance or enforcement. Its purpose is to raise common expectations for safety, instructional quality, cadet protection and transparent outcomes across the training ecosystem.

India’s Pilot Training Boom Faces Test Of Safety, Standards And Industry Maturity

Read More

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 6

Read More

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 5

Read More

Read More Perspectives

Read More Stories

Aviation Today Exclusive

Inside Aviation

Tecnam Presents Modern Trainers for Modern Pilots | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

3:51

Boeing’s Wisk Aero Presents Fully Autonomous Gen 6 eVTOL Aircraft | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

3:10

High Concentration, Zero Error: Responsibility of Air Traffic Control | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

5:32

TAV1000i – Design & Built in India Simulator for Precision in Ab-Initio Pilot Training

3:42

Smiths Detection’s Next-Generation CT Baggage Screening Technology | Wings India 2026

4:05

From Solar Champion to Charter Gateway Pioneer: CIAL’s Evolution | Wings India 2026

4:06

Sakthi Aviation & Defence Systems Introduces L410NG to Boost India's Remote Connectivity

3:46

DAU School Of Law Unveils Aviation Law Vertical For India’s Aviation Sector | Wings India 2026

5:37

A Clear Path to Becoming a Pilot: United 7 Aero’s Global Training Model | Wings India 2026

5:44

Raghu Vamsi's Arrobot Presents Next-Generation Aerial & Ground Robotics | Wings India 2026

5:23

Made In India Diamond DA40 NG: Combining Technology & Efficiency for Flight Training

6:03

TiHAN Highlights Autonomous Shuttles, Cargo Drones & Smart Mobility

5:38

Gandhi Automations Showcasing Advanced Hangar Door Technologies for Aviation Infrastructure

5:20

Aviacom on High-Fidelity Flight Simulator Technology | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

2:56

EgyptAir Training Academy Highlights B737 MAX Type Rating & Training Programs | Wings India 2026

7:19

Aksi Aerospace Group Showcases Indigenous Drone Manufacturing Ecosystem | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

2:06

Aviation Today Perspectives

A hard look at the system behind the licence before speed and hype define the future of Indian aviation. India is producing pilots at a pace the country has never seen before. This is a positive development. A large and growing airline market needs trained professionals, and a nation with India’s aviation ambition cannot remain dependent on foreign flight schools forever. But growth is not maturity. The real question before Indian aviation is not whether we can produce pilots faster. It is whether we are building a pilot-training system strong enough to produce them safely, consistently and honestly. By 30 June 2026, India had issued 1,331 Commercial Pilot Licences. Of these, 540, or 41 percent, were issued to cadets trained outside India. This tells us two things at once: demand is real, and domestic capacity still has substantial work to do. The country is expanding its FTO network, aircraft fleet and cadet intake. Yet the system cannot measure its success only by licences issued, aircraft inducted or advertisements released. A CPL is not the finish line. It is the beginning of professional formation. The dangerous language of fast track flying: The most worrying development in pilot training is not ambition. It is the language surrounding ambition: fast-track CPL, airline pilot in record time, guaranteed placement, finish early, fly early, earn early. Such promises may attract students, but they can quietly distort the purpose of training. Aviation is not a product that becomes better because it is delivered faster. A student pilot is not a customer moving through a production line. Flying competence takes time: time to make errors under supervision, time to develop judgement, time to understand weather, time to learn restraint, and time to build respect for procedures. An industry built around the fastest possible licence will eventually face the consequences of the slowest-developing element in aviation: judgement. There is nothing wrong with efficient training. There is everything wrong with training efficiency becoming a commercial pressure that competes with operational discipline. A cadet should never feel that a delay caused by weather, maintenance, instructor assessment or a failed standard is an injustice. In aviation, delay is often the system protecting the student. The truth must be stated without hesitation: no FTO can ethically guarantee an airline job. It can guarantee transparent training, good instruction, aircraft availability, fair standards, honest counselling and employability support. It cannot guarantee the airline market, medical fitness, individual performance, type-rating outcomes or future hiring cycles. “A licence may be promised. A career cannot.” Safety must be a value not a priority: A priority can change with the day’s pressure. It can move when a target is missed, an aircraft is unavailable, admissions slow down or an investor asks difficult questions. A value does not move. This distinction is at the heart of India’s present training challenge. When safety is treated as a priority, it may be pushed aside in the name of utilisation, student completion, revenue or reputation. When safety is treated as a value, every decision dispatch, weather, fuel, aircraft serviceability, instructor release, solo authorisation, continuation or diversion must pass through it. The record of accidents and serious incidents is not an argument against flight training. Flying training will always involve risk because it is where people learn to manage aircraft, weather, workload and error. But the record must force us to ask better questions. In one final investigation report, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau reviewed ten years of FTO accidents through December 2022 and recorded 28 accidents, including 10 involving fatalities. IMAGEEEEEEEEEE : PG 33 GRAPH It identified repeated themes: deviation from standard procedures, unauthorised activity, low flying, operations below visual conditions, incorrect take-off and landing patterns, weak supervision and shortcomings in safety culture. These are not merely technical failures. They are organisational warnings. The lesson is not that every accident has one cause or that every FTO is unsafe. Investigation must never be used to apportion blame before facts are established. The lesson is that a system cannot market speed and scale while treating safety reporting, instructor standardisation, maintenance discipline and independent oversight as paperwork. Every FTO should be able to answer simple questions with evidence: How many unstable approaches were discontinued? How many weather-related no-go decisions were supported by management? How many maintenance defects were reported, repeated and permanently rectified? How are instructors standardised, checked and supervised? What hazards are reported voluntarily, and what corrective action follows? How is student pressure identified before it becomes unsafe decision-making? If these answers are not visible inside the organisation, safety is probably being managed as a document, not lived as a value. The overseas training question: The 41 percent overseas share is not proof that Indian training is inferior. It is proof that Indian students are making practical choices in response to capacity, aircraft availability, weather, timelines, perceived quality, international exposure and confidence in completion schedules. Foreign training can offer advantages: reliable flying weather in some regions, larger fleets, established training systems, exposure to controlled airspace and a more predictable training calendar. But it also brings conversion complexity, regulatory differences and the challenge of adapting back to Indian airspace, procedures and airline expectations. India should not respond by criticising foreign training. It should respond by becoming the more dependable option. That means Indian FTOs must compete on quality of outcomes, not merely on lower advertised fees or shorter timelines. The goal should be a mature domestic system where training is transparent, safe, professionally supervised and globally credible. Why MPL should wait? The Multi-Crew Pilot Licence is not inherently unsafe. Properly designed, it is a sophisticated, competency-based airline pathway. ICAO introduced MPL provisions in 2006, and EASA’s Part-FCL framework has developed detailed requirements around it for years. But MPL is not simply a cheaper CPL with more simulator hours. It requires a tightly controlled ecosystem: a genuine and continuing airline-ATO relationship; validated competency standards; high-fidelity, well-supervised simulation; instructors with substantial multi-crew operational experience; calibrated assessors; robust data monitoring; transparent safeguards; and an airline culture capable of taking responsibility for the cadet from selection through line operations. EASA’s framework recognises this depth. MPL is linked to structured ATO–operator arrangements and instructor requirements rooted in multi-pilot experience and crew-resource-management competence. This is not an off-the-shelf programme to be inserted into a fragmented training market. India should therefore resist any hurried, mass-market MPL rollout for at least the next decade. This is not opposition to innovation. It is respect for sequencing. Before MPL is introduced at scale, India should first demonstrate: A stable and independently audited FTO oversight system. Stronger instructor training, standardisation and recurrent-checking systems. Mandatory safety-management systems that produce usable, protected occurrence data. Clear national standards for simulator qualification, availability, fidelity and data capture. Airline-linked MPL programmes where the airline, not merely the student, holds genuine responsibility for the training outcome. Public reporting of completion rates, washout rates, safety events, instructor ratios and post training performance. A regulatory workforce with the capacity to supervise competency-based programmes continuously, not only approve them on paper. “MPL may become right for India. But it will become right only when India is ready to regulate it as an airline-integrated safety system, not as another commercial shortcut.” The choice before Indian aviation: “India does not need fewer pilots. It needs better-developed pilots, better-supported instructors, better-governed FTOs and more mature oversight.” The next decade should not be about producing the largest number of CPLs. It should be about building the most trustworthy pilot-development system in the region. The aviation industry must reject the culture of hype. It must stop selling certainty where none exists. It must stop treating time as the only measure of success. A pilot is not produced when the logbook reaches a number. A pilot is formed when competence, judgment, humility, discipline and safety values become stronger than commercial pressure. India has the demand. It has talent. It has the opportunity. Now it must prove that its rules, institutions and mindset can mature at the same speed as its ambition. National Pilot Training Agenda & Flight Training Bharat Standards: The National Pilot Training Maturity Agenda can be advanced through Flight Training Bharat Standards: an industry-led, voluntary benchmark designed to complement DGCA requirements, not replace regulatory approval, surveillance or enforcement. Its purpose is to raise common expectations for safety, instructional quality, cadet protection and transparent outcomes across the training ecosystem.

India’s Pilot Training Boom Faces Test Of Safety, Standards And Industry Maturity

Read More

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 6

Read More

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 5

Read More

Read More Perspectives

Aircraft Crashes

Airlines

Incidents

Philippine Air Force Grounds SF-260 Fleet After After Mid-Air Collision Kills Four

Philippine Air Force Grounds SF-260 Fleet After After Mid-Air Collision Kills Four

Three Killed In Small Aircraft Crash Near Colorado’s Remote Swampy Pass Wilderness Area

Three Killed In Small Aircraft Crash Near Colorado’s Remote Swampy Pass Wilderness Area

French Mirage 2000D Crashes During Night Training, Killing Both Crew Members In France

French Mirage 2000D Crashes During Night Training, Killing Both Crew Members In France

Two Killed After Light Aircraft Crashes Near Airstrip In Northern Greece

Two Killed After Light Aircraft Crashes Near Airstrip In Northern Greece

Two Killed In Aircraft Crash Near Drymen After Departure From Glasgow Airport

Two Killed In Aircraft Crash Near Drymen After Departure From Glasgow Airport

Macao, China: Global airlines incurred $24.5 billion in payment-related costs in 2025 while processing $1.05 trillion in sales, according to new data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) on 27 October 2026. The figures show that payment costs increased by 10.4% compared with 2023, significantly outpacing the 7.7% growth in travel sales over the same period, when sales rose from $977 billion to $1.05 trillion. IATA said the average payment cost amounted to $5 per passenger, exceeding its forecast net profit of $4.50 per passenger for the airline industry in 2026. The association warned that the growing cost of processing transactions is adding pressure to an industry characterised by intense competition, high capital requirements and narrow profit margins. “The airline industry is hyper competitive, capital intensive and famously low margin. In such an environment every cost item needs to be looked at carefully. The fact that payment transaction costs are increasing faster than industry revenues is unsustainable and, despite significant technological advances, highlights the critical need for greater cost efficiency,” said Sandrine Le Borgne, IATA’s Interim Director General and Chief Financial Officer. IATA’s analysis of the $24.5 billion payment bill identified three principal cost categories: direct transaction fees, airline operating expenses associated with payment processing, and losses from fraud or uncollected sales. Direct payment fees accounted for $20.7 billion, representing 84.5% of the total. These expenses cover the direct costs of completing transactions. A further $2.9 billion, or 11.8%, was attributed to airline operating costs, including payment systems, delayed cash flow, staffing and compliance. The remaining $0.9 billion, equivalent to 3.7%, was lost through fraud or sales that airlines could not collect. Card payments were the most expensive payment option identified in the release, with average payment fees of 2.53%. This was higher than the estimated overall average payment fee of 1.97%. By comparison, the lowest-cost payment options carried fees of 0.01%, highlighting the potential for airlines to reduce expenses by expanding the use of more economical payment methods. IATA is encouraging airlines to introduce alternative, lower-cost payment methods as passenger preferences evolve. Its 2025 Global Passenger Survey found that 29% of passengers preferred digital wallets, while 8% favoured local instant payment solutions. To support this shift, IATA highlighted two existing services: IATA Pay and the IATA Financial Gateway (IFG). IATA Pay allows passengers to purchase travel using local instant payment solutions. The service has been rolled out in 34 countries and covers 38 payment schemes. The IATA Financial Gateway enables airlines and travel suppliers to manage, optimize and control payments across multiple sales channels in more than 170 countries, using over 300 payment methods. The association said these services can help airlines respond to changing payment preferences while improving efficiency in managing transactions. Another area of focus is the cost of agency cards. IATA’s Transparency In Payments solution enables airlines to establish their payment policies and frameworks within the IATA Billing & Settlement Plan (BSP). The system is intended to help airlines make informed decisions about whether to accept agency cards instead of customer cards or choose other cost-effective alternatives available through the BSP, including IATA EASY PAY. IATA said improving transparency around these costs would help airlines evaluate the financial implications of different payment methods and make decisions that better support their commercial priorities. IATA is also working with airlines and corporate customers to develop a new approach to corporate travel payments as the industry moves towards the Offers & Orders model. The initiative is designed to improve payment efficiency, simplify reconciliation and provide richer transaction data. It is also intended to give airlines and corporate customers greater choice in how payments are managed. In addition, IATA has developed the Airline Payment Framework – Management Foundation. The framework is intended to help airlines align their commercial, financial and operational priorities when evaluating payment options, ensuring that payment systems support both customer experience and financial performance. Beyond reducing costs, IATA said offering passengers more payment options could help airlines recover revenue lost when transactions fail. “In addition to cost-efficiency, IATA research shows that providing passengers with alternative payment methods could also have a revenue-generating impact. About one in five ancillary purchase attempts are not completed because the initial payment attempt was refused and no other method was offered. Enabling more payment options has the potential to help airlines realize some of this lost revenue,” said Le Borgne. Ancillary purchases include additional products and services sold alongside air travel. IATA’s finding indicates that when an initial payment is declined and no alternative is available, airlines may lose sales that could otherwise have been completed. The association’s proposed measures therefore address both sides of the issue: reducing the cost of processing payments and providing passengers with more opportunities to complete purchases. IATA, the International Air Transport Association, represents more than 370 airlines that account for approximately 85% of global air traffic, according to the note for editors accompanying its 27 October 2026 release.

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

American Airlines Forecasts 2026 Loss And Slower 2027 Growth Despite Record Q3 Revenue

American Airlines Forecasts 2026 Loss And Slower 2027 Growth Despite Record Q3 Revenue

Government Rules Out Any Confirmed AirAsia Bailout Deal As Financial Pressure Grows

Government Rules Out Any Confirmed AirAsia Bailout Deal As Financial Pressure Grows

Four United Airlines Flight Attendants Injured In Severe Turbulence Near Los Angeles

Four United Airlines Flight Attendants Injured In Severe Turbulence Near Los Angeles

Fire Erupts On LATAM Airlines A320 Before Takeoff In Lima, Passengers Evacuated Safely

Fire Erupts On LATAM Airlines A320 Before Takeoff In Lima, Passengers Evacuated Safely

Austrian Airlines Confirms No Threat After Tel Aviv–Vienna Flight Diverts To Sofia

Austrian Airlines Confirms No Threat After Tel Aviv–Vienna Flight Diverts To Sofia

Nine Safe After Bombardier Challenger 604 Loses Door Shortly After Abuja Departure

Nine Safe After Bombardier Challenger 604 Loses Door Shortly After Abuja Departure

Hyderabad, India: An IndiGo flight operating from Delhi to Chennai was diverted to Hyderabad on 11 October after smoke was detected from a passenger’s personal electronic device, with media reports identifying the device as a power bank that caught fire inside the aircraft’s overhead storage compartment. The aircraft landed safely at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport (RGIA), Hyderabad, and an alternative aircraft was arranged to take passengers to Chennai. The flight, numbered 6E 6115, was operated by an Airbus A321, media reported that 191 people were aboard the aircraft. The exact breakdown of passengers and crew has not been independently confirmed through an official airline statement. No injuries were reported in connection with this flight. In a statement IndiGo said: “IndiGo flight 6E 6115, operating from Delhi to Chennai on October 11, 2026, was diverted to Hyderabad after smoke was detected from a customer’s personal electronic device. The cabin crew responded promptly and the situation was brought under control. In line with established protocols, the pilots diverted the flight and landed safely at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Hyderabad. An alternate aircraft has been arranged to continue the journey to Chennai.” The airline added: “We regret the inconvenience caused to our customers due to this unforeseen situation and are making all efforts to minimise it, including offering refreshments and sharing timely updates.” Visuals circulated on social media and published by news outlets appeared to show flames and smoke coming from an overhead compartment, with passengers attempting to contain the fire. However, IndiGo’s statement did not specify the device involved, confirm the exact location of the fire or explain what caused the smoke. The power bank identification and details of the fire were reported by media outlets. The incident has renewed attention on the carriage and use of lithium-ion batteries aboard aircraft. IndiGo’s published baggage policy states that power banks and spare or loose lithium batteries are permitted only in hand baggage. They must remain within the passenger’s personal reach, such as under the seat, in a seat pocket or carried on the person. The policy explicitly states that these items must not be stored in overhead compartments or checked baggage. The airline’s policy also says that, subject to applicable security clearance, passengers may carry up to two spare or loose lithium-ion batteries, including power banks, rated up to 100 watt-hours (Wh). Batteries between 100 Wh and 160 Wh may be permitted under specified approval conditions for portable medical devices. Battery terminals must be insulated to prevent short circuits, and power banks must not be recharged or used to charge another device while aboard the aircraft. IndiGo’s boarding information also instructs passengers not to use or charge power banks during flights. The airline’s restrictions apply to both domestic and international services. The reported location of the fire is significant because the airline’s policy specifically prohibits storing power banks in overhead compartments. However, the available reporting does not establish how the device came to be stored there or whether any passenger or airline procedure was breached. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) issued a Dangerous Goods Advisory Circular on 11 November 2025, advising airlines to prohibit the use of power banks to charge portable electronic devices during flights because of safety concerns involving lithium batteries. In a written answer to Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1801, answered on 9 March 2026, the Ministry of Civil Aviation confirmed the advisory’s date and purpose. The government stated that the DGCA issued the circular “advising airlines to prohibit the use of power banks for charging portable electronic devices during flight, in view of safety concerns arising from lithium battery-related incidents.” The government also stated that the first such instance was reported to the DGCA on 19 October 2025. The parliamentary answer referred to the advisory and the Aircraft (Carriage of Dangerous Goods) Rules, 2026. Lithium-ion batteries can overheat and enter a process known as thermal runaway, potentially causing smoke, fire and the release of hot gases. Such events can be difficult to manage in an aircraft cabin, making prompt detection and crew intervention important. The precise mechanism behind the reported fire on flight 6E 6115 has not been established in the airline statement or the reports cited here. Earlier IndiGo power bank incidents: The latest incident follows an earlier power bank fire aboard IndiGo flight 6E 108, which operated from Hyderabad to Chandigarh on 5 May 2026. The aircraft had landed in Chandigarh and was taxiing when a passenger’s power bank caught fire in a seat pocket. Two fire extinguishers were used, and passengers were evacuated. Another incident occurred on 19 October 2025, when a passenger’s power bank reportedly caught fire in a seat-back pocket aboard IndiGo flight 6E 2107 from Delhi to Dimapur while the aircraft was taxiing for take-off. The flight returned to its parking bay. These incidents have highlighted the importance of keeping power banks accessible, avoiding their use during flights and informing cabin crew immediately if a device becomes unusually hot, emits smoke or produces an unusual smell. For the 11 October incident, the airline’s publicly reported statement confirms the smoke detection, crew response, diversion and safe landing. The precise cause of the fire, the device’s specifications and the circumstances in which it was stored remain unconfirmed.

IndiGo A321 Diverts To Hyderabad After Smoke Detected From Passenger’s Electronic Device

Aircraft Crashes

Philippine Air Force Grounds SF-260 Fleet After After Mid-Air Collision Kills Four

Philippine Air Force Grounds SF-260 Fleet After After Mid-Air Collision Kills Four

Three Killed In Small Aircraft Crash Near Colorado’s Remote Swampy Pass Wilderness Area

Three Killed In Small Aircraft Crash Near Colorado’s Remote Swampy Pass Wilderness Area

French Mirage 2000D Crashes During Night Training, Killing Both Crew Members In France

French Mirage 2000D Crashes During Night Training, Killing Both Crew Members In France

Two Killed After Light Aircraft Crashes Near Airstrip In Northern Greece

Two Killed After Light Aircraft Crashes Near Airstrip In Northern Greece

Two Killed In Aircraft Crash Near Drymen After Departure From Glasgow Airport

Two Killed In Aircraft Crash Near Drymen After Departure From Glasgow Airport

Airlines

Macao, China: Global airlines incurred $24.5 billion in payment-related costs in 2025 while processing $1.05 trillion in sales, according to new data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) on 27 October 2026. The figures show that payment costs increased by 10.4% compared with 2023, significantly outpacing the 7.7% growth in travel sales over the same period, when sales rose from $977 billion to $1.05 trillion. IATA said the average payment cost amounted to $5 per passenger, exceeding its forecast net profit of $4.50 per passenger for the airline industry in 2026. The association warned that the growing cost of processing transactions is adding pressure to an industry characterised by intense competition, high capital requirements and narrow profit margins. “The airline industry is hyper competitive, capital intensive and famously low margin. In such an environment every cost item needs to be looked at carefully. The fact that payment transaction costs are increasing faster than industry revenues is unsustainable and, despite significant technological advances, highlights the critical need for greater cost efficiency,” said Sandrine Le Borgne, IATA’s Interim Director General and Chief Financial Officer. IATA’s analysis of the $24.5 billion payment bill identified three principal cost categories: direct transaction fees, airline operating expenses associated with payment processing, and losses from fraud or uncollected sales. Direct payment fees accounted for $20.7 billion, representing 84.5% of the total. These expenses cover the direct costs of completing transactions. A further $2.9 billion, or 11.8%, was attributed to airline operating costs, including payment systems, delayed cash flow, staffing and compliance. The remaining $0.9 billion, equivalent to 3.7%, was lost through fraud or sales that airlines could not collect. Card payments were the most expensive payment option identified in the release, with average payment fees of 2.53%. This was higher than the estimated overall average payment fee of 1.97%. By comparison, the lowest-cost payment options carried fees of 0.01%, highlighting the potential for airlines to reduce expenses by expanding the use of more economical payment methods. IATA is encouraging airlines to introduce alternative, lower-cost payment methods as passenger preferences evolve. Its 2025 Global Passenger Survey found that 29% of passengers preferred digital wallets, while 8% favoured local instant payment solutions. To support this shift, IATA highlighted two existing services: IATA Pay and the IATA Financial Gateway (IFG). IATA Pay allows passengers to purchase travel using local instant payment solutions. The service has been rolled out in 34 countries and covers 38 payment schemes. The IATA Financial Gateway enables airlines and travel suppliers to manage, optimize and control payments across multiple sales channels in more than 170 countries, using over 300 payment methods. The association said these services can help airlines respond to changing payment preferences while improving efficiency in managing transactions. Another area of focus is the cost of agency cards. IATA’s Transparency In Payments solution enables airlines to establish their payment policies and frameworks within the IATA Billing & Settlement Plan (BSP). The system is intended to help airlines make informed decisions about whether to accept agency cards instead of customer cards or choose other cost-effective alternatives available through the BSP, including IATA EASY PAY. IATA said improving transparency around these costs would help airlines evaluate the financial implications of different payment methods and make decisions that better support their commercial priorities. IATA is also working with airlines and corporate customers to develop a new approach to corporate travel payments as the industry moves towards the Offers & Orders model. The initiative is designed to improve payment efficiency, simplify reconciliation and provide richer transaction data. It is also intended to give airlines and corporate customers greater choice in how payments are managed. In addition, IATA has developed the Airline Payment Framework – Management Foundation. The framework is intended to help airlines align their commercial, financial and operational priorities when evaluating payment options, ensuring that payment systems support both customer experience and financial performance. Beyond reducing costs, IATA said offering passengers more payment options could help airlines recover revenue lost when transactions fail. “In addition to cost-efficiency, IATA research shows that providing passengers with alternative payment methods could also have a revenue-generating impact. About one in five ancillary purchase attempts are not completed because the initial payment attempt was refused and no other method was offered. Enabling more payment options has the potential to help airlines realize some of this lost revenue,” said Le Borgne. Ancillary purchases include additional products and services sold alongside air travel. IATA’s finding indicates that when an initial payment is declined and no alternative is available, airlines may lose sales that could otherwise have been completed. The association’s proposed measures therefore address both sides of the issue: reducing the cost of processing payments and providing passengers with more opportunities to complete purchases. IATA, the International Air Transport Association, represents more than 370 airlines that account for approximately 85% of global air traffic, according to the note for editors accompanying its 27 October 2026 release.

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

American Airlines Forecasts 2026 Loss And Slower 2027 Growth Despite Record Q3 Revenue

American Airlines Forecasts 2026 Loss And Slower 2027 Growth Despite Record Q3 Revenue

Government Rules Out Any Confirmed AirAsia Bailout Deal As Financial Pressure Grows

Government Rules Out Any Confirmed AirAsia Bailout Deal As Financial Pressure Grows

Incidents

Four United Airlines Flight Attendants Injured In Severe Turbulence Near Los Angeles

Four United Airlines Flight Attendants Injured In Severe Turbulence Near Los Angeles

Fire Erupts On LATAM Airlines A320 Before Takeoff In Lima, Passengers Evacuated Safely

Fire Erupts On LATAM Airlines A320 Before Takeoff In Lima, Passengers Evacuated Safely

Austrian Airlines Confirms No Threat After Tel Aviv–Vienna Flight Diverts To Sofia

Austrian Airlines Confirms No Threat After Tel Aviv–Vienna Flight Diverts To Sofia

Nine Safe After Bombardier Challenger 604 Loses Door Shortly After Abuja Departure

Nine Safe After Bombardier Challenger 604 Loses Door Shortly After Abuja Departure

Hyderabad, India: An IndiGo flight operating from Delhi to Chennai was diverted to Hyderabad on 11 October after smoke was detected from a passenger’s personal electronic device, with media reports identifying the device as a power bank that caught fire inside the aircraft’s overhead storage compartment. The aircraft landed safely at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport (RGIA), Hyderabad, and an alternative aircraft was arranged to take passengers to Chennai. The flight, numbered 6E 6115, was operated by an Airbus A321, media reported that 191 people were aboard the aircraft. The exact breakdown of passengers and crew has not been independently confirmed through an official airline statement. No injuries were reported in connection with this flight. In a statement IndiGo said: “IndiGo flight 6E 6115, operating from Delhi to Chennai on October 11, 2026, was diverted to Hyderabad after smoke was detected from a customer’s personal electronic device. The cabin crew responded promptly and the situation was brought under control. In line with established protocols, the pilots diverted the flight and landed safely at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Hyderabad. An alternate aircraft has been arranged to continue the journey to Chennai.” The airline added: “We regret the inconvenience caused to our customers due to this unforeseen situation and are making all efforts to minimise it, including offering refreshments and sharing timely updates.” Visuals circulated on social media and published by news outlets appeared to show flames and smoke coming from an overhead compartment, with passengers attempting to contain the fire. However, IndiGo’s statement did not specify the device involved, confirm the exact location of the fire or explain what caused the smoke. The power bank identification and details of the fire were reported by media outlets. The incident has renewed attention on the carriage and use of lithium-ion batteries aboard aircraft. IndiGo’s published baggage policy states that power banks and spare or loose lithium batteries are permitted only in hand baggage. They must remain within the passenger’s personal reach, such as under the seat, in a seat pocket or carried on the person. The policy explicitly states that these items must not be stored in overhead compartments or checked baggage. The airline’s policy also says that, subject to applicable security clearance, passengers may carry up to two spare or loose lithium-ion batteries, including power banks, rated up to 100 watt-hours (Wh). Batteries between 100 Wh and 160 Wh may be permitted under specified approval conditions for portable medical devices. Battery terminals must be insulated to prevent short circuits, and power banks must not be recharged or used to charge another device while aboard the aircraft. IndiGo’s boarding information also instructs passengers not to use or charge power banks during flights. The airline’s restrictions apply to both domestic and international services. The reported location of the fire is significant because the airline’s policy specifically prohibits storing power banks in overhead compartments. However, the available reporting does not establish how the device came to be stored there or whether any passenger or airline procedure was breached. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) issued a Dangerous Goods Advisory Circular on 11 November 2025, advising airlines to prohibit the use of power banks to charge portable electronic devices during flights because of safety concerns involving lithium batteries. In a written answer to Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1801, answered on 9 March 2026, the Ministry of Civil Aviation confirmed the advisory’s date and purpose. The government stated that the DGCA issued the circular “advising airlines to prohibit the use of power banks for charging portable electronic devices during flight, in view of safety concerns arising from lithium battery-related incidents.” The government also stated that the first such instance was reported to the DGCA on 19 October 2025. The parliamentary answer referred to the advisory and the Aircraft (Carriage of Dangerous Goods) Rules, 2026. Lithium-ion batteries can overheat and enter a process known as thermal runaway, potentially causing smoke, fire and the release of hot gases. Such events can be difficult to manage in an aircraft cabin, making prompt detection and crew intervention important. The precise mechanism behind the reported fire on flight 6E 6115 has not been established in the airline statement or the reports cited here. Earlier IndiGo power bank incidents: The latest incident follows an earlier power bank fire aboard IndiGo flight 6E 108, which operated from Hyderabad to Chandigarh on 5 May 2026. The aircraft had landed in Chandigarh and was taxiing when a passenger’s power bank caught fire in a seat pocket. Two fire extinguishers were used, and passengers were evacuated. Another incident occurred on 19 October 2025, when a passenger’s power bank reportedly caught fire in a seat-back pocket aboard IndiGo flight 6E 2107 from Delhi to Dimapur while the aircraft was taxiing for take-off. The flight returned to its parking bay. These incidents have highlighted the importance of keeping power banks accessible, avoiding their use during flights and informing cabin crew immediately if a device becomes unusually hot, emits smoke or produces an unusual smell. For the 11 October incident, the airline’s publicly reported statement confirms the smoke detection, crew response, diversion and safe landing. The precise cause of the fire, the device’s specifications and the circumstances in which it was stored remain unconfirmed.

IndiGo A321 Diverts To Hyderabad After Smoke Detected From Passenger’s Electronic Device

Join our WhatsApp Channel

Aviation Today Exclusive Interviews

Inside Aviation

Tecnam Presents Modern Trainers for Modern Pilots | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

3:51

Boeing’s Wisk Aero Presents Fully Autonomous Gen 6 eVTOL Aircraft | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

3:10

High Concentration, Zero Error: Responsibility of Air Traffic Control | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

5:32

TAV1000i – Design & Built in India Simulator for Precision in Ab-Initio Pilot Training

3:42

Smiths Detection’s Next-Generation CT Baggage Screening Technology | Wings India 2026

4:05

From Solar Champion to Charter Gateway Pioneer: CIAL’s Evolution | Wings India 2026

4:06

Sakthi Aviation & Defence Systems Introduces L410NG to Boost India's Remote Connectivity

3:46

DAU School Of Law Unveils Aviation Law Vertical For India’s Aviation Sector | Wings India 2026

5:37

A Clear Path to Becoming a Pilot: United 7 Aero’s Global Training Model | Wings India 2026

5:44

Raghu Vamsi's Arrobot Presents Next-Generation Aerial & Ground Robotics | Wings India 2026

5:23

Made In India Diamond DA40 NG: Combining Technology & Efficiency for Flight Training

6:03

TiHAN Highlights Autonomous Shuttles, Cargo Drones & Smart Mobility

5:38

Gandhi Automations Showcasing Advanced Hangar Door Technologies for Aviation Infrastructure

5:20

Aviacom on High-Fidelity Flight Simulator Technology | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

2:56

EgyptAir Training Academy Highlights B737 MAX Type Rating & Training Programs | Wings India 2026

7:19

Aksi Aerospace Group Showcases Indigenous Drone Manufacturing Ecosystem | Wings India 2026 Exclusive

2:06

Latest News

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

October 28, 2026

Goolwa, Australia: The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has found that an unauthorised spin manoeuvre likely preceded the fatal crash

Macao, China: Global airlines incurred $24.5 billion in payment-related costs in 2025 while processing $1.05 trillion in sales, according to new data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) on 27 October 2026. The figures show that payment costs increased by 10.4% compared with 2023, significantly outpacing the 7.7% growth in travel sales over the same period, when sales rose from $977 billion to $1.05 trillion. IATA said the average payment cost amounted to $5 per passenger, exceeding its forecast net profit of $4.50 per passenger for the airline industry in 2026. The association warned that the growing cost of processing transactions is adding pressure to an industry characterised by intense competition, high capital requirements and narrow profit margins. “The airline industry is hyper competitive, capital intensive and famously low margin. In such an environment every cost item needs to be looked at carefully. The fact that payment transaction costs are increasing faster than industry revenues is unsustainable and, despite significant technological advances, highlights the critical need for greater cost efficiency,” said Sandrine Le Borgne, IATA’s Interim Director General and Chief Financial Officer. IATA’s analysis of the $24.5 billion payment bill identified three principal cost categories: direct transaction fees, airline operating expenses associated with payment processing, and losses from fraud or uncollected sales. Direct payment fees accounted for $20.7 billion, representing 84.5% of the total. These expenses cover the direct costs of completing transactions. A further $2.9 billion, or 11.8%, was attributed to airline operating costs, including payment systems, delayed cash flow, staffing and compliance. The remaining $0.9 billion, equivalent to 3.7%, was lost through fraud or sales that airlines could not collect. Card payments were the most expensive payment option identified in the release, with average payment fees of 2.53%. This was higher than the estimated overall average payment fee of 1.97%. By comparison, the lowest-cost payment options carried fees of 0.01%, highlighting the potential for airlines to reduce expenses by expanding the use of more economical payment methods. IATA is encouraging airlines to introduce alternative, lower-cost payment methods as passenger preferences evolve. Its 2025 Global Passenger Survey found that 29% of passengers preferred digital wallets, while 8% favoured local instant payment solutions. To support this shift, IATA highlighted two existing services: IATA Pay and the IATA Financial Gateway (IFG). IATA Pay allows passengers to purchase travel using local instant payment solutions. The service has been rolled out in 34 countries and covers 38 payment schemes. The IATA Financial Gateway enables airlines and travel suppliers to manage, optimize and control payments across multiple sales channels in more than 170 countries, using over 300 payment methods. The association said these services can help airlines respond to changing payment preferences while improving efficiency in managing transactions. Another area of focus is the cost of agency cards. IATA’s Transparency In Payments solution enables airlines to establish their payment policies and frameworks within the IATA Billing & Settlement Plan (BSP). The system is intended to help airlines make informed decisions about whether to accept agency cards instead of customer cards or choose other cost-effective alternatives available through the BSP, including IATA EASY PAY. IATA said improving transparency around these costs would help airlines evaluate the financial implications of different payment methods and make decisions that better support their commercial priorities. IATA is also working with airlines and corporate customers to develop a new approach to corporate travel payments as the industry moves towards the Offers & Orders model. The initiative is designed to improve payment efficiency, simplify reconciliation and provide richer transaction data. It is also intended to give airlines and corporate customers greater choice in how payments are managed. In addition, IATA has developed the Airline Payment Framework – Management Foundation. The framework is intended to help airlines align their commercial, financial and operational priorities when evaluating payment options, ensuring that payment systems support both customer experience and financial performance. Beyond reducing costs, IATA said offering passengers more payment options could help airlines recover revenue lost when transactions fail. “In addition to cost-efficiency, IATA research shows that providing passengers with alternative payment methods could also have a revenue-generating impact. About one in five ancillary purchase attempts are not completed because the initial payment attempt was refused and no other method was offered. Enabling more payment options has the potential to help airlines realize some of this lost revenue,” said Le Borgne. Ancillary purchases include additional products and services sold alongside air travel. IATA’s finding indicates that when an initial payment is declined and no alternative is available, airlines may lose sales that could otherwise have been completed. The association’s proposed measures therefore address both sides of the issue: reducing the cost of processing payments and providing passengers with more opportunities to complete purchases. IATA, the International Air Transport Association, represents more than 370 airlines that account for approximately 85% of global air traffic, according to the note for editors accompanying its 27 October 2026 release.

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

October 28, 2026

Macao, China: Global airlines incurred $24.5 billion in payment-related costs in 2025 while processing $1.05 trillion in sales, according to

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

October 27, 2026

New York, United States: JetBlue Airways reported a net loss of $257 million for the third quarter of 2026, compared

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

October 27, 2026

Sydney, Australia: Virgin Australia cabin crew will vote on whether to authorise protected industrial action as negotiations over their pay

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Email

Recent News

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

October 28, 2026

Macao, China: Global airlines incurred $24.5 billion in payment-related costs in 2025 while processing $1.05 trillion in sales, according to new data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) on 27 October 2026. The figures show that payment costs increased by 10.4% compared with 2023, significantly outpacing the 7.7% growth in travel sales over the same period, when sales rose from $977 billion to $1.05 trillion. IATA said the average payment cost amounted to $5 per passenger, exceeding its forecast net profit of $4.50 per passenger for the airline industry in 2026. The association warned that the growing cost of processing transactions is adding pressure to an industry characterised by intense competition, high capital requirements and narrow profit margins. “The airline industry is hyper competitive, capital intensive and famously low margin. In such an environment every cost item needs to be looked at carefully. The fact that payment transaction costs are increasing faster than industry revenues is unsustainable and, despite significant technological advances, highlights the critical need for greater cost efficiency,” said Sandrine Le Borgne, IATA’s Interim Director General and Chief Financial Officer. IATA’s analysis of the $24.5 billion payment bill identified three principal cost categories: direct transaction fees, airline operating expenses associated with payment processing, and losses from fraud or uncollected sales. Direct payment fees accounted for $20.7 billion, representing 84.5% of the total. These expenses cover the direct costs of completing transactions. A further $2.9 billion, or 11.8%, was attributed to airline operating costs, including payment systems, delayed cash flow, staffing and compliance. The remaining $0.9 billion, equivalent to 3.7%, was lost through fraud or sales that airlines could not collect. Card payments were the most expensive payment option identified in the release, with average payment fees of 2.53%. This was higher than the estimated overall average payment fee of 1.97%. By comparison, the lowest-cost payment options carried fees of 0.01%, highlighting the potential for airlines to reduce expenses by expanding the use of more economical payment methods. IATA is encouraging airlines to introduce alternative, lower-cost payment methods as passenger preferences evolve. Its 2025 Global Passenger Survey found that 29% of passengers preferred digital wallets, while 8% favoured local instant payment solutions. To support this shift, IATA highlighted two existing services: IATA Pay and the IATA Financial Gateway (IFG). IATA Pay allows passengers to purchase travel using local instant payment solutions. The service has been rolled out in 34 countries and covers 38 payment schemes. The IATA Financial Gateway enables airlines and travel suppliers to manage, optimize and control payments across multiple sales channels in more than 170 countries, using over 300 payment methods. The association said these services can help airlines respond to changing payment preferences while improving efficiency in managing transactions. Another area of focus is the cost of agency cards. IATA’s Transparency In Payments solution enables airlines to establish their payment policies and frameworks within the IATA Billing & Settlement Plan (BSP). The system is intended to help airlines make informed decisions about whether to accept agency cards instead of customer cards or choose other cost-effective alternatives available through the BSP, including IATA EASY PAY. IATA said improving transparency around these costs would help airlines evaluate the financial implications of different payment methods and make decisions that better support their commercial priorities. IATA is also working with airlines and corporate customers to develop a new approach to corporate travel payments as the industry moves towards the Offers & Orders model. The initiative is designed to improve payment efficiency, simplify reconciliation and provide richer transaction data. It is also intended to give airlines and corporate customers greater choice in how payments are managed. In addition, IATA has developed the Airline Payment Framework – Management Foundation. The framework is intended to help airlines align their commercial, financial and operational priorities when evaluating payment options, ensuring that payment systems support both customer experience and financial performance. Beyond reducing costs, IATA said offering passengers more payment options could help airlines recover revenue lost when transactions fail. “In addition to cost-efficiency, IATA research shows that providing passengers with alternative payment methods could also have a revenue-generating impact. About one in five ancillary purchase attempts are not completed because the initial payment attempt was refused and no other method was offered. Enabling more payment options has the potential to help airlines realize some of this lost revenue,” said Le Borgne. Ancillary purchases include additional products and services sold alongside air travel. IATA’s finding indicates that when an initial payment is declined and no alternative is available, airlines may lose sales that could otherwise have been completed. The association’s proposed measures therefore address both sides of the issue: reducing the cost of processing payments and providing passengers with more opportunities to complete purchases. IATA, the International Air Transport Association, represents more than 370 airlines that account for approximately 85% of global air traffic, according to the note for editors accompanying its 27 October 2026 release.

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

October 28, 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

October 27, 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

October 27, 2026

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope's Orbit

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope’s Orbit

October 27, 2026

Do you have the Pilot in you?

Explore More

Webinar

Industry Expert’s Voice

Indian Aviation Statistics

Submit Aviation Blog

Editor's Pick

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

Investigation

Posted onOctober 28, 2026October 28, 2026

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

Airlines

Posted onOctober 28, 2026October 28, 2026

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

Airlines

Posted onOctober 27, 2026October 27, 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Airlines

Posted onOctober 27, 2026October 27, 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Airlines

Montreal, Canada: The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has sounded a strong warning on global air safety, highlighting rising accident rates as flight activity reaches record levels. In its latest State of Global Aviation Safety report released this month, the UN aviation agency revealed that 2024 saw 95 accidents involving scheduled commercial flights, compared with 66 the previous year. Of these, 10 were fatal, resulting in 296 deaths, an alarming jump from 72 in 2023. The global accident rate also rose to 2.56 per million departures, up from 1.87 the previous year. While ICAO stressed that aviation remains the safest form of travel, the organization called for urgent international action to address mounting risks as passenger demand continues to grow worldwide. ICAO’s data show that the most significant accident categories included controlled flight into terrain, loss of control in flight, mid-air collisions, and runway incursions. These accounted for 25 percent of total fatalities and 40 percent of fatal accidents in 2024. Turbulence has also emerged as a key concern, responsible for nearly three-quarters of serious injuries recorded last year. The Asia-Pacific and Europe/North Atlantic regions each reported three fatal accidents, while a single catastrophic crash in South America caused 62 deaths. Overall, Asia-Pacific recorded the highest number of fatalities, followed by South America, then Europe and the North Atlantic. Alongside accident data, ICAO flagged growing risks from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) disruptions, such as jamming and spoofing, which threaten the reliability of modern navigation. The organization is updating guidance and working with member states to protect GNSS integrity, while also strengthening runway safety initiatives, turbulence monitoring, and wildlife strike reporting. ICAO is further developing frameworks for civil-military cooperation to manage risks linked to conflict zones and restricted airspace, and it is preparing safety systems for the integration of unmanned aircraft and advanced air mobility vehicles into shared skies. ICAO leaders underscored that the rise in accidents is a wake-up call for regulators, airlines, and governments worldwide. Secretary General Juan Carlos Salazar noted that the long-term safety trend remains positive but emphasized that “aviation remains the safest form of transport” only if proactive measures are sustained.

ICAO Warns of Rising Air Safety Risks as Global Flight Activity Hits Record Levels

August 27, 2025

Montreal, Canada: The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has sounded a strong warning on global air safety, highlighting rising accident

Houthi Missiles Strike Aden Airport Near Yemenia Flight, Passengers Evacuated Safely

Houthi Missiles Strike Aden Airport Near Yemenia Flight, Passengers Evacuated Safely

October 17, 2026

Russia Claims 902 Ukrainian Drones Intercepted As Moscow Airports Suspend Flights

Russia Claims 902 Ukrainian Drones Intercepted As Moscow Airports Suspend Flights

October 14, 2026

Germany’s Nuremberg Airport Shuts Temporarily After False Corendon Flight Hijack Alert

Germany’s Nuremberg Airport Shuts Temporarily After False Corendon Flight Hijack Alert

October 14, 2026

Saudi Arabia Probes Air Defence Lapse After Riyadh Airport Attacks Kill 13, Injure 300

Saudi Arabia Probes Air Defence Lapse After Riyadh Airport Attacks Kill 13, Injure 300

October 13, 2026

Airports

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

October 28, 2026

Goolwa, Australia: The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has found that an unauthorised spin manoeuvre likely preceded the fatal crash

Macao, China: Global airlines incurred $24.5 billion in payment-related costs in 2025 while processing $1.05 trillion in sales, according to new data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) on 27 October 2026. The figures show that payment costs increased by 10.4% compared with 2023, significantly outpacing the 7.7% growth in travel sales over the same period, when sales rose from $977 billion to $1.05 trillion. IATA said the average payment cost amounted to $5 per passenger, exceeding its forecast net profit of $4.50 per passenger for the airline industry in 2026. The association warned that the growing cost of processing transactions is adding pressure to an industry characterised by intense competition, high capital requirements and narrow profit margins. “The airline industry is hyper competitive, capital intensive and famously low margin. In such an environment every cost item needs to be looked at carefully. The fact that payment transaction costs are increasing faster than industry revenues is unsustainable and, despite significant technological advances, highlights the critical need for greater cost efficiency,” said Sandrine Le Borgne, IATA’s Interim Director General and Chief Financial Officer. IATA’s analysis of the $24.5 billion payment bill identified three principal cost categories: direct transaction fees, airline operating expenses associated with payment processing, and losses from fraud or uncollected sales. Direct payment fees accounted for $20.7 billion, representing 84.5% of the total. These expenses cover the direct costs of completing transactions. A further $2.9 billion, or 11.8%, was attributed to airline operating costs, including payment systems, delayed cash flow, staffing and compliance. The remaining $0.9 billion, equivalent to 3.7%, was lost through fraud or sales that airlines could not collect. Card payments were the most expensive payment option identified in the release, with average payment fees of 2.53%. This was higher than the estimated overall average payment fee of 1.97%. By comparison, the lowest-cost payment options carried fees of 0.01%, highlighting the potential for airlines to reduce expenses by expanding the use of more economical payment methods. IATA is encouraging airlines to introduce alternative, lower-cost payment methods as passenger preferences evolve. Its 2025 Global Passenger Survey found that 29% of passengers preferred digital wallets, while 8% favoured local instant payment solutions. To support this shift, IATA highlighted two existing services: IATA Pay and the IATA Financial Gateway (IFG). IATA Pay allows passengers to purchase travel using local instant payment solutions. The service has been rolled out in 34 countries and covers 38 payment schemes. The IATA Financial Gateway enables airlines and travel suppliers to manage, optimize and control payments across multiple sales channels in more than 170 countries, using over 300 payment methods. The association said these services can help airlines respond to changing payment preferences while improving efficiency in managing transactions. Another area of focus is the cost of agency cards. IATA’s Transparency In Payments solution enables airlines to establish their payment policies and frameworks within the IATA Billing & Settlement Plan (BSP). The system is intended to help airlines make informed decisions about whether to accept agency cards instead of customer cards or choose other cost-effective alternatives available through the BSP, including IATA EASY PAY. IATA said improving transparency around these costs would help airlines evaluate the financial implications of different payment methods and make decisions that better support their commercial priorities. IATA is also working with airlines and corporate customers to develop a new approach to corporate travel payments as the industry moves towards the Offers & Orders model. The initiative is designed to improve payment efficiency, simplify reconciliation and provide richer transaction data. It is also intended to give airlines and corporate customers greater choice in how payments are managed. In addition, IATA has developed the Airline Payment Framework – Management Foundation. The framework is intended to help airlines align their commercial, financial and operational priorities when evaluating payment options, ensuring that payment systems support both customer experience and financial performance. Beyond reducing costs, IATA said offering passengers more payment options could help airlines recover revenue lost when transactions fail. “In addition to cost-efficiency, IATA research shows that providing passengers with alternative payment methods could also have a revenue-generating impact. About one in five ancillary purchase attempts are not completed because the initial payment attempt was refused and no other method was offered. Enabling more payment options has the potential to help airlines realize some of this lost revenue,” said Le Borgne. Ancillary purchases include additional products and services sold alongside air travel. IATA’s finding indicates that when an initial payment is declined and no alternative is available, airlines may lose sales that could otherwise have been completed. The association’s proposed measures therefore address both sides of the issue: reducing the cost of processing payments and providing passengers with more opportunities to complete purchases. IATA, the International Air Transport Association, represents more than 370 airlines that account for approximately 85% of global air traffic, according to the note for editors accompanying its 27 October 2026 release.

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

October 28, 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

October 27, 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

October 27, 2026

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope's Orbit

NASA Ends 21-Year Swift Mission After Failed Attempt To Boost Telescope’s Orbit

October 27, 2026

More News

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

ATSB Finds Unauthorised Spin Likely Preceded Fatal Cessna 210 Crash Near Goolwa

October 28, 2026

Macao, China: Global airlines incurred $24.5 billion in payment-related costs in 2025 while processing $1.05 trillion in sales, according to new data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) on 27 October 2026. The figures show that payment costs increased by 10.4% compared with 2023, significantly outpacing the 7.7% growth in travel sales over the same period, when sales rose from $977 billion to $1.05 trillion. IATA said the average payment cost amounted to $5 per passenger, exceeding its forecast net profit of $4.50 per passenger for the airline industry in 2026. The association warned that the growing cost of processing transactions is adding pressure to an industry characterised by intense competition, high capital requirements and narrow profit margins. “The airline industry is hyper competitive, capital intensive and famously low margin. In such an environment every cost item needs to be looked at carefully. The fact that payment transaction costs are increasing faster than industry revenues is unsustainable and, despite significant technological advances, highlights the critical need for greater cost efficiency,” said Sandrine Le Borgne, IATA’s Interim Director General and Chief Financial Officer. IATA’s analysis of the $24.5 billion payment bill identified three principal cost categories: direct transaction fees, airline operating expenses associated with payment processing, and losses from fraud or uncollected sales. Direct payment fees accounted for $20.7 billion, representing 84.5% of the total. These expenses cover the direct costs of completing transactions. A further $2.9 billion, or 11.8%, was attributed to airline operating costs, including payment systems, delayed cash flow, staffing and compliance. The remaining $0.9 billion, equivalent to 3.7%, was lost through fraud or sales that airlines could not collect. Card payments were the most expensive payment option identified in the release, with average payment fees of 2.53%. This was higher than the estimated overall average payment fee of 1.97%. By comparison, the lowest-cost payment options carried fees of 0.01%, highlighting the potential for airlines to reduce expenses by expanding the use of more economical payment methods. IATA is encouraging airlines to introduce alternative, lower-cost payment methods as passenger preferences evolve. Its 2025 Global Passenger Survey found that 29% of passengers preferred digital wallets, while 8% favoured local instant payment solutions. To support this shift, IATA highlighted two existing services: IATA Pay and the IATA Financial Gateway (IFG). IATA Pay allows passengers to purchase travel using local instant payment solutions. The service has been rolled out in 34 countries and covers 38 payment schemes. The IATA Financial Gateway enables airlines and travel suppliers to manage, optimize and control payments across multiple sales channels in more than 170 countries, using over 300 payment methods. The association said these services can help airlines respond to changing payment preferences while improving efficiency in managing transactions. Another area of focus is the cost of agency cards. IATA’s Transparency In Payments solution enables airlines to establish their payment policies and frameworks within the IATA Billing & Settlement Plan (BSP). The system is intended to help airlines make informed decisions about whether to accept agency cards instead of customer cards or choose other cost-effective alternatives available through the BSP, including IATA EASY PAY. IATA said improving transparency around these costs would help airlines evaluate the financial implications of different payment methods and make decisions that better support their commercial priorities. IATA is also working with airlines and corporate customers to develop a new approach to corporate travel payments as the industry moves towards the Offers & Orders model. The initiative is designed to improve payment efficiency, simplify reconciliation and provide richer transaction data. It is also intended to give airlines and corporate customers greater choice in how payments are managed. In addition, IATA has developed the Airline Payment Framework – Management Foundation. The framework is intended to help airlines align their commercial, financial and operational priorities when evaluating payment options, ensuring that payment systems support both customer experience and financial performance. Beyond reducing costs, IATA said offering passengers more payment options could help airlines recover revenue lost when transactions fail. “In addition to cost-efficiency, IATA research shows that providing passengers with alternative payment methods could also have a revenue-generating impact. About one in five ancillary purchase attempts are not completed because the initial payment attempt was refused and no other method was offered. Enabling more payment options has the potential to help airlines realize some of this lost revenue,” said Le Borgne. Ancillary purchases include additional products and services sold alongside air travel. IATA’s finding indicates that when an initial payment is declined and no alternative is available, airlines may lose sales that could otherwise have been completed. The association’s proposed measures therefore address both sides of the issue: reducing the cost of processing payments and providing passengers with more opportunities to complete purchases. IATA, the International Air Transport Association, represents more than 370 airlines that account for approximately 85% of global air traffic, according to the note for editors accompanying its 27 October 2026 release.

Global Airlines Paid $24.5 Billion In Transaction Costs On $1.05 Trillion Sales: IATA

October 28, 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

JetBlue’s Q3 Loss Widens To $257 Million As Fuel Costs Surge 61% In 2026

October 27, 2026

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

Virgin Australia Cabin Crew To Vote On Protected Action Over Pay And Rostering

October 27, 2026

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Email

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Email

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Coming Soon!

Explore

Subscribe

First Name

Last Name

Phone/Mobile

Email

Topic

Your Message

Attach Document

Choose File

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube