Latest Aviation News | Updated Global Aviation News

Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

Latest News

New Delhi, India: The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has intensified its challenge to the emerging narrative surrounding the Air India Flight 171 crash investigation, arguing that critical technical questions remain unanswered and urging investigators to conduct additional simulator testing before issuing a final report. Addressing a press conference on June 20, FIP President Captain C. S. Randhawa disputed suggestions that the Boeing 787's fuel control switches were deliberately moved by the flight crew, stating that “the pilots have actually not moved the switches.” The remarks come amid growing scrutiny of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary findings into the June 12, 2025 crash of Air India Flight 171, which killed 260 people shortly after departure from Ahmedabad. The AAIB's preliminary report concluded that both engine fuel control switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF shortly after takeoff, resulting in the loss of fuel supply to both engines. Cockpit voice recordings reportedly captured one pilot asking the other why the fuel had been cut off, with the second pilot denying responsibility. However, FIP argues that the preliminary findings leave several critical issues unresolved. According to Randhawa, the report failed to include cockpit warning sequences that would normally accompany a significant electrical malfunction. The federation contends that if an electrical disturbance occurred before the engines lost power, the cockpit voice recorder should contain caution messages, warning alerts and associated audio warnings that were not discussed in the preliminary findings. Randhawa also questioned why investigators allegedly did not give sufficient weight to the testimony of the crash's sole survivor, Vishwash Kumar Ramesh. According to Randhawa, Ramesh reported seeing lights flickering inside the cabin shortly after the aircraft became airborne. The FIP president argued that this observation could be a significant clue pointing toward a possible electrical malfunction, noting that cabin lights are normally configured for takeoff and should not have been flickering under normal conditions. He said the survivor's account, when considered alongside technical material submitted by the federation regarding electrical-system anomalies and transmitted fault codes, warranted a deeper examination of a potential electrical-failure scenario rather than an exclusive focus on pilot actions. Randhawa maintained that the survivor's statement could represent an important piece of evidence in understanding the chain of events that led to the crash. FIP further highlighted Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) maintenance messages transmitted around the time of departure. The federation has requested that Air India provide the original ACARS records and that Boeing assist investigators in decoding the data to determine whether any technical abnormalities were present before the accident. Another area of concern involves the Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC) system. FIP has urged investigators to examine whether a malfunction or protective system response within the engine-control architecture could have contributed to the simultaneous loss of power. The federation has additionally questioned the condition of the flight data recorder recovered from the aircraft, arguing that the extent of recorder damage appears inconsistent with reports that much of the tail section remained relatively intact. Randhawa also questioned why Captain Sandhu, who he described as an experienced Boeing 787 pilot, had not been involved in the investigation. FIP has formally written to the Prime Minister's Office, the Ministry of Civil Aviation, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation and the AAIB, requesting fresh simulator testing and a broader technical review before publication of the final accident report. The pilots' organization maintains that technical explanations have not been fully exhausted and warns against attributing blame to the flight crew while several lines of inquiry remain open. The final report into the crash has not yet been released, with investigators continuing engine analysis and other technical examinations. Aviation authorities have repeatedly urged caution against speculation, emphasizing that the investigation remains ongoing.

India

Indian Pilot’s Body: AI171 Pilots Did Not Move Fuel Switches, Calls For Simulator Tests

June 21, 2026

Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh Airport resumed operations on Saturday after a major security incident forced the evacuation of the terminal, the closure of surrounding roads, and widespread disruption to flights and ground transport services. The incident began at approximately 6:50 p.m. local time on Friday, June 19, when authorities received reports of a potentially suspicious package at the airport. Police Scotland immediately launched a security response, ordering the evacuation of the terminal building while specialist Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) teams were deployed to assess the item. A security cordon was established around the airport, and several access roads were closed as bomb disposal experts conducted their investigation. Hundreds of passengers were evacuated from the terminal and directed away from the airport while emergency personnel secured the area. According to Police Scotland, the evacuation was implemented as a precautionary measure following the report of the suspicious package. Officers urged travelers to contact their airlines for updates and warned of significant disruption while enquiries were ongoing. Airport operator Edinburgh Airport confirmed that specialist teams were investigating the item and advised passengers to check directly with their airlines before travelling to the airport. Flight operations were significantly affected throughout the evening. Multiple arriving aircraft were diverted to alternative airports, including Glasgow Airport, while numerous departures were delayed or suspended. Several flights reportedly entered holding patterns or altered their routes as the security operation unfolded. Ground transportation services were also disrupted. Coach operator Citylink announced that its airport services were unable to access the terminal because of the ongoing incident. Temporary pickup and drop-off arrangements were established at nearby locations, including the Moxy Hotel and Hilton Hotel bus stops. The airport remained largely shut down for several hours while EOD specialists examined the package. Operations began returning to normal during the early hours of Saturday after authorities completed their assessment and lifted restrictions. The prolonged closure created knock-on effects across airline schedules, with passengers warned to expect delays and operational disruptions as carriers worked to reposition aircraft and recover their networks. As of Saturday morning, airport operations had resumed, although airlines continued to advise travelers to verify the status of their flights before heading to the airport. Police Scotland has not announced any arrests in connection with the incident, and investigations into the circumstances surrounding the discovery remain ongoing.

Airports

Edinburgh Airport Reopens After Overnight Evacuation Over Suspicious Package Alert

June 20, 2026

Niamey, Niger: At least 35 people were killed after heavily armed attackers launched a coordinated assault on Niger's main international airport and an adjoining military airbase in the capital Niamey on June 18, 2026, marking the second major attack on the strategic facility this year. According to Niger's Ministry of Defence, the attack left 11 members of the security forces and two civilians dead. Security forces repelled the assault, killing 22 attackers and arresting approximately 20 suspects. Weapons and ammunition were also seized during the operation. The attack targeted Diori Hamani International Airport and the adjacent military installation, a key security hub that hosts Niger's air force assets and serves as the headquarters of the joint military force formed by Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso under the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). Witnesses reported hearing sustained gunfire and explosions beginning around 6:00 a.m. local time. The fighting lasted for more than two hours as security forces battled the attackers around the airport complex. According to sources cited by Al Jazeera and AFP, some of the assailants arrived at a security checkpoint near the airport by taxi before engaging security personnel. Gunfire echoed across the area for hours as troops responded to the assault. Witnesses described scenes of panic around the airport, while soldiers later established checkpoints and conducted searches on roads leading to the facility. Four people were also wounded during the attack, according to preliminary figures released by the Defence Ministry. Despite the violence, Nigerien authorities said the airport remained secure and operational. In a statement broadcast on national television, the Defence Ministry said, "The international airport, which is fully secured, remains open to air traffic." The ministry added that a "large-scale operation" was underway to pursue those involved in the assault. Hours after the attack, Niger's National Civil Aviation Agency confirmed that airport operations had resumed normally. Responsibility for the attack was claimed by Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), an al-Qaeda-linked militant group that operates across the Sahel region. JNIM said it had carried out what it described as a "suicide attack" against Diori Hamani International Airport and a neighboring military base. The claim was published through the group's media outlet, Az-Zallaqa Foundation. The attack underscores the growing threat posed by jihadist groups across the Sahel, where al-Qaeda-linked and Islamic State-affiliated organizations continue to compete for territory and influence. The airport is considered one of Niger's most strategically important facilities. In addition to serving as the country's primary international gateway, the complex houses military aircraft, drones and air force infrastructure. It also serves as a command center for the Alliance of Sahel States, the regional bloc created by Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso following military takeovers in the three countries. The symbolism and military significance of the airport make it an attractive target for extremist groups seeking to challenge state authority. "The symbolism of the airport as headquarters for AES will drive intent by militants to target it," security analyst Beverly Ochieng of Control Risks told the Associated Press. The June 18 attack was the second major assault on the airport complex this year. On January 29, militants linked to Islamic State's Sahel Province launched a large-scale attack on the same facility, targeting military assets and drone infrastructure. Nigerien authorities said that the attack was repelled after fierce fighting. The latest assault reflects an evolving militant strategy in which extremist groups are increasingly expanding operations from remote rural regions into major urban centers. Ibrahim Yahaya Ibrahim, Deputy Project Director at the International Crisis Group, said the attack also reflects competition between rival jihadist factions operating in the region. "JNIM in Niger is trying to mark its territory. This is a message to the government but also to IS (Islamic State)," he said. Niger has faced escalating insecurity since the military seized power in a 2023 coup. Along with neighboring Mali and Burkina Faso, the country remains at the center of one of the world's deadliest jihadist insurgencies. The three military-led governments have shifted away from traditional Western security partnerships and strengthened cooperation with Russia while continuing operations against armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and Islamic State.

Airports

35 Killed In Gunmen Attack On Niger’s Main Airport And Military Base In Niamey

June 20, 2026

Amsterdam, Netherlands: A KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Boeing 777-300ER operating a scheduled service from Amsterdam to São Paulo made a precautionary return to Amsterdam Schiphol Airport on Friday after the flight crew declared an emergency while over western Europe. The aircraft, operating as Flight KL791, departed Amsterdam for São Paulo/Guarulhos International Airport before turning back toward the Netherlands several hours into the journey. Flight-tracking data showed the aircraft reversing course near the French coast and proceeding back toward Amsterdam, where it later landed safely. The aircraft involved was identified as Boeing 777-300ER registration PH-BVS. Fleet records indicate the widebody jet entered service with KLM in February 2017 and is one of 16 Boeing 777-300ERs operated by the Dutch flag carrier. The emergency declaration was linked to a suspected oil leak. However, neither KLM nor airport authorities had publicly confirmed the exact nature of the technical issue. As the aircraft returned to Schiphol, emergency services were placed on standby as a precaution. The aircraft conducted fuel-dumping procedures before landing, a common measure used by long-haul aircraft returning shortly after departure to reduce landing weight. Flight-tracking updates showed KL791 commencing its descent toward Amsterdam before approaching the Dutch coastline. The aircraft continued normally through the final stages of the approach and landed safely on Runway 27 at Schiphol Airport at approximately 1444 UK time (1544 local time in the Netherlands). Following touchdown, the Boeing 777 vacated the runway without difficulty and taxied under its own power to the terminal area. Reports indicated the aircraft subsequently parked at Gate F3, bringing the emergency response to a close without further incident. No injuries were reported, and no evacuation was required. As of publication, KLM had not released details regarding the number of passengers and crew onboard, nor had the airline provided further information regarding the suspected technical malfunction. The incident remains under review, and additional details are expected once KLM completes its technical inspection of the aircraft.

Incidents

KLM Boeing 777 Returns To Amsterdam After Declaring Emergency Over Suspected Oil Leak

June 20, 2026

New Mexico, United States: The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has released its preliminary findings into the fatal crash of a medevac Beechcraft King Air C90 in New Mexico, revealing that the crew experienced a loss of GPS navigation capability while military GPS jamming operations were active in the region. The accident occurred shortly after midnight on May 14, 2026, near Lincoln, New Mexico. The aircraft, registration N249CP, was operating as an air ambulance flight under Part 135 regulations. The flight was being conducted by Generations Jets on behalf of Trans Aero Medical Services. All four people aboard the aircraft, two pilots and two flight nurses were killed. The aircraft was destroyed by impact forces and a post-crash fire. According to the NTSB, the flight departed Roswell Air Center at approximately 11:52 p.m. local time on May 13 and was headed to Sierra Blanca Regional Airport in Ruidoso to pick up a patient for transport to Albuquerque. Investigators found that military GPS jamming activities were underway during the flight and encompassed the route being flown. Shortly after departure, the crew informed Albuquerque Air Route Traffic Control Center that the aircraft had lost GPS capability and requested heading guidance from controllers. The crew initially planned to fly the RNAV (GPS) approach into Ruidoso but later requested the ILS Runway 24 approach after losing satellite-based navigation. During the same period, several other aircraft in the region also reported GPS disruptions, with one pilot requiring additional assistance to identify a ground-based navigation aid. Air traffic controllers contacted military authorities and requested that GPS jamming be suspended. Controllers subsequently provided radar vectors toward the airport. At approximately 12:08 a.m., while about 31 miles northeast of Ruidoso, the flight crew reported that they had the airport area in sight and could proceed visually. Controllers cleared the aircraft for a visual approach and advised that the crew could cancel IFR once established. No further communications were received from the aircraft. Flight tracking data showed the aircraft turning southwest toward Sierra Blanca Regional Airport and beginning its descent. The route crossed the Capitan Mountains, a rugged terrain area with peaks exceeding 10,000 feet. The aircraft descended to roughly 9,400 feet before initiating a slight climb. The final recorded position placed the airplane at about 9,823 feet and traveling approximately 150 knots. Seconds later, the aircraft struck terrain at an elevation of about 9,950 feet near the Capitan Mountains Summit Radio Facility. The impact occurred only a few hundred feet from the aircraft's final recorded position and triggered a post-crash fire that later spread into a forest fire. The preliminary report also revealed that pilots had been provided notices warning of GPS interference before departure. The flight briefing package contained a NOTAM advising that GPS, WAAS, GBAS and ADS-B services could be unavailable across a large area of New Mexico due to military operations. Additional notices indicated that Sierra Blanca Regional Airport's automated weather observation system was out of service. Investigators noted that no METAR or TAF weather reports were available for the airport at the time of the accident. The NTSB emphasized that the report is preliminary and that no probable cause has yet been determined. Investigators continue to examine the role of GPS interference, flight crew actions, navigation challenges, terrain clearance and other operational factors. A final report establishing the probable cause of the accident is expected following completion of the investigation.

Investigation

NTSB Preliminary Report Details GPS Interference Before Fatal New Mexico Medevac Crash

June 19, 2026

Tokyo, Japan: A British Airways flight preparing to depart Tokyo Haneda Airport for London Heathrow was forced to return to its parking stand on Thursday, June 18, after a passenger's smartphone caught fire while the aircraft was taxiing for takeoff. According to Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), smoke was reported from the cabin at approximately 1:10 p.m. local time. The aircraft was operating a scheduled British Airways service from Tokyo Haneda Airport (HND) to London Heathrow Airport (LHR). Japanese transport officials said the smartphone is believed to have belonged to a passenger. Cabin crew responded immediately and extinguished the fire using onboard firefighting equipment before airport emergency personnel became involved. The aircraft returned to its stand where firefighters and airline personnel carried out safety inspections. No injuries were reported among the 211 passengers and crew members on board. Authorities said the incident occurred while the aircraft was taxiing for departure and had not yet taken off. Following inspections and confirmation that the situation was under control, the flight later departed after a delay of approximately one hour. The event marks the second British Airways lithium-battery-related cabin fire incident reported within days. On June 15, British Airways Flight BA271 from London Heathrow to Las Vegas experienced a cellphone fire while crossing the Atlantic. Air traffic control recordings captured the crew reporting that the device had "scorched the inside of the cabin," although the fire was quickly contained. The Boeing 787-9 landed safely at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas and no injuries were reported. Airlines and regulators have increasingly strengthened guidance on the carriage and handling of lithium battery-powered devices following a growing number of onboard battery-related incidents in recent years. Japanese authorities have not released additional details regarding the smartphone involved, including its manufacturer or model, and no investigation findings have yet been announced.

Incidents

Passenger Smartphone Fire Forces British Airways Flight Back To Parking Stand In Tokyo

June 19, 2026

Paringa, New Zealand: A loose maintenance bolt that detached during flight caused an Airbus AS350BA helicopter to become increasingly difficult to control before it crashed near the Paringa River mouth on New Zealand's West Coast, according to final findings released by the Transport Accident Investigation Commission (TAIC). The accident occurred on July 20, 2024, while an Amuri Helicopters Airbus AS350BA, registration ZK-HJM, was being flown from Queenstown to Franz Josef following maintenance work performed at Queenstown Aerodrome. The helicopter was carrying a pilot and one passenger. Both occupants sustained minor injuries and were transported to hospital, while the aircraft suffered substantial damage. According to the investigation, engineers from Salus Aviation had swapped the helicopter's left and right hydraulic servo actuators during scheduled maintenance. However, a critical securing bolt on the lower attachment point of the left-hand hydraulic servo actuator was not properly secured before the aircraft was returned to service. Investigators determined that the associated nut had not been tightened to the required torque and that a locking pin was either missing or incorrectly installed. Although the work was subject to a mandatory duplicate inspection by a second engineer, the defect went undetected. Approximately 52 minutes into the flight, the pilot felt a sudden jolt and observed abnormal main rotor blade tracking. Seven minutes later, concerned by the abnormal indications, the pilot initiated a precautionary landing. During the descent, cyclic control forces increased significantly, particularly when attempting left control inputs. As the helicopter descended to between three and seven metres above the ground, it rolled and collided with terrain before coming to rest on its left side. TAIC found that the securing bolt eventually detached completely during the flight, significantly limiting the pilot's control of the helicopter. The investigation identified several human-factor issues that contributed to the maintenance error. The engineer responsible for the task was reportedly distracted by both a customer interaction and a hydraulic fluid spill while performing the work. Investigators also found the engineer was working under time pressure ahead of a planned holiday and did not sufficiently verify the maintenance task before completion. The second engineer responsible for the duplicate safety inspection also failed to identify the improperly secured hardware. The engineer told investigators they could not explain why the defect was missed but acknowledged experiencing broken sleep at the time, which may have affected performance. Following the accident, Salus Aviation conducted an internal investigation and implemented a series of corrective actions. The company temporarily removed the involved engineers from release-to-service inspection duties, introduced additional training, strengthened inspection and documentation procedures, implemented independent post-maintenance inspections, and established regular assurance audits. Measures aimed at reducing workplace distractions and improving engineering oversight were also introduced. TAIC concluded that the maintenance provider had adequately addressed the safety deficiencies identified during the investigation. As a result, the Commission did not issue any formal safety recommendations.

Investigation

Loose Bolt Left Undetected During Inspection Caused New Zealand Airbus AS350 Crash

June 19, 2026

Garden Grove, United States: More than 30 lawsuits have been filed against GKN Aerospace following a chemical tank emergency at the company's Garden Grove, California, facility that forced the evacuation of approximately 50,000 residents and triggered multiple state and federal investigations. The legal actions stem from an incident that began on May 21, when a storage tank containing between 6,000 and 7,000 gallons of methyl methacrylate (MMA), a highly flammable chemical used in acrylic plastics and aerospace manufacturing, began overheating at GKN Aerospace's Transparency Systems facility in Orange County. Authorities feared the tank could rupture, ignite, or trigger a catastrophic explosion capable of endangering surrounding communities and nearby chemical storage tanks. The emergency prompted widespread evacuation orders across portions of Garden Grove and neighboring communities, including Anaheim, Cypress, Stanton, Westminster and Buena Park, during the Memorial Day holiday period. According to emergency officials, the tank's internal temperature rose steadily as responders worked around the clock to cool and stabilize the vessel. Initial attempts to neutralize the chemical reaction were complicated by damage to tank valves. At one point, officials warned that a rupture could release thousands of gallons of hazardous material. The threat eased after responders identified what was described as a crack or fissure in the tank that appeared to relieve internal pressure. Air monitoring conducted throughout the emergency did not detect hazardous levels of contaminants outside the facility, and authorities ultimately reported that no explosion occurred and no significant chemical release was detected. Despite the absence of a confirmed release, the incident disrupted the lives of tens of thousands of residents for several days. Evacuation orders remained in place until officials determined the immediate danger had passed. The growing wave of litigation includes residents, workers, business owners, families and property owners who allege negligence in the maintenance, inspection and operation of the facility. At least 10 of the lawsuits have been filed as class-action cases in federal court, while numerous additional cases have been filed in California state courts. Among the plaintiffs are residents who claim they experienced headaches, nausea, respiratory symptoms and other health effects during the emergency. Some families reported being forced to leave hospitals, hotels or temporary shelters as evacuation zones expanded. Business owners have also alleged significant financial losses after being forced to close during one of the busiest holiday weekends of the year. Several lawsuits seek compensation for evacuation expenses, lost income, emotional distress, medical monitoring, diminished property values and other damages. Attorneys representing plaintiffs have argued that the company failed to adequately inspect, maintain and monitor the MMA storage system and failed to implement sufficient safeguards to prevent the incident.The legal scrutiny has been accompanied by an escalating federal investigation. On June 10, agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency executed a federal search warrant at the Garden Grove facility. Investigators collected documents, electronic records, maintenance files, inspection records and chemical samples as part of an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the tank failure. Federal officials said investigators are examining whether any federal environmental or industrial safety laws were violated. The warrant authorized the seizure of records related to the storage, handling, temperature control, maintenance, use and disposal of methyl methacrylate, as well as communications among company personnel regarding the chemical and storage systems. Federal authorities also brought EPA scientists and chemists to the site to collect evidence, conduct testing and assist investigators. Officials have indicated that the inquiry remains active and could take months to complete. In parallel, the Orange County District Attorney's Office has launched a separate criminal investigation into the incident. The emergency also renewed scrutiny of regulatory oversight surrounding the facility. Reports have highlighted previous regulatory actions involving the site, including workplace safety citations and a 2025 air-quality settlement with the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Community leaders and residents have questioned whether hazardous chemical storage should continue in close proximity to densely populated residential neighborhoods. During public meetings held after the evacuation orders were lifted, residents urged GKN Aerospace to relocate its chemical storage operations or implement stronger safety protections. Local officials have also criticized the company's initial financial assistance package. GKN Aerospace announced community assistance totaling several million dollars to help offset emergency costs incurred by local governments and residents. However, some elected officials described the contribution as insufficient given the scale of the disruption and emergency response. GKN Aerospace has repeatedly stated that it is cooperating fully with investigators and regulators. Company representatives have apologized to residents affected by the emergency and pledged to support ongoing recovery efforts. The Garden Grove facility employs more than 500 workers and serves as a key supplier to major aerospace manufacturers. The plant produces aircraft transparencies, cockpit windows, passenger windows, windshields and canopies used on commercial and military aircraft, including Boeing 737 MAX airliners, Airbus A350 aircraft and Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jets. Following a temporary shutdown, GKN Aerospace recently announced plans to begin a phased restart of operations in portions of the facility unaffected by the MMA storage incident. Aerospace manufacturers have indicated that immediate impacts on production programs remain limited, although they continue to monitor developments closely.

Aerospace

30+ Lawsuits Target GKN Aerospace After Chemical Tank Incident Forced 50,000 Evacuations

June 19, 2026

New York, United States: A Delta Air Lines Airbus A321neo landed safely at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) on June 16 after reports of a possible nose-wheel tire issue prompted a large-scale emergency response from airport and city authorities. Delta Flight 1966 was operating a scheduled service from San Juan, Puerto Rico, to New York-JFK when concerns emerged regarding the aircraft’s nose landing gear during its approach into the airport. Initial reports received by emergency responders indicated that the inbound aircraft may have been experiencing issues involving its front tires, leading authorities to prepare for a potential emergency landing. According to the New York City Fire Department (FDNY), a call was received at approximately 4:45 p.m. local time reporting that the aircraft had "two flat front tires." In response, the department initiated a precautionary second-alarm standby deployment, dispatching 46 units and 141 fire and emergency medical personnel to JFK Airport. The aircraft, an Airbus A321neo operated by Delta Air Lines, was carrying 170 passengers along with six crew members, consisting of two pilots and four flight attendants. Flight tracking data shows the aircraft landed safely at JFK at approximately 5:31 p.m. local time. Emergency vehicles were positioned alongside the runway as a precaution while the aircraft completed its landing. Following touchdown, the aircraft remained under observation before being cleared to continue taxiing to the terminal. The aircraft was subsequently escorted to Terminal 4, where it arrived without incident. No injuries were reported among passengers or crew. Following the landing, Delta Air Lines clarified that the situation was less severe than initially reported. The airline stated that maintenance inspections identified damage and tread wear to one tire rather than multiple flat or blown tires. "There was some damage to one tire, but not a major situation given the maintenance team determined the aircraft was suitable to continue taxiing over to the gate for the tire replacement rather than having to do so on the taxiway," Delta said in a statement. The airline added that the aircraft was able to taxi under its own power and that the emergency response proved largely precautionary. Video footage captured by local news helicopters after the landing appeared to show the aircraft’s nose-wheel tires still inflated, further supporting Delta’s assessment that the tire had sustained damage rather than a complete failure. No evacuation was required, and passengers disembarked normally after arrival. Delta has not indicated any further operational impact resulting from the incident. The circumstances surrounding the tire damage have not been publicly disclosed, and there has been no indication of any broader safety issue involving the aircraft.

Incidents

Delta Lands Safely At JFK After Tire Damage Report Triggers Major Emergency Response

June 18, 2026

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has highlighted Brazil’s significant potential to become a global leader in Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) production, positioning the country as a key contributor to aviation’s decarbonisation efforts while strengthening energy security and driving economic growth. The assessment was presented during IATA’s 82nd Annual General Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, where the association outlined Brazil’s strategic advantages in supporting the aviation industry's transition toward net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. According to IATA, airlines worldwide will require approximately 500 million tonnes (Mt) of SAF annually by 2050 to meet the sector’s net-zero commitment. Brazil is well positioned to support this demand due to its extensive biomass resources and established biofuels industry. IATA estimates that Brazil possesses one of the world's largest biomass feedstock potentials, capable of reaching around 180 million tonnes by 2050, which could support the production of approximately 60 million tonnes of SAF. In the near term, sustainably sourced sugarcane ethanol along with virgin and waste oil feedstocks could provide around 18 million tonnes of feedstock by 2030, translating into approximately 12 million tonnes of SAF production potential. IATA noted that this volume would be roughly five times greater than the estimated global SAF production of 2.4 million tonnes expected in 2026. Brazil currently has around 15 SAF development projects underway. If all projects proceed as planned, they could collectively bring approximately 2 million tonnes of SAF production capacity online. “Brazil has all the ingredients to be a global SAF powerhouse. It has one of the cleanest electricity mixes in the world as well as abundant feedstock. Moreover, as the second largest producer of liquid biofuels in the world, the country benefits from deep expertise and developed infrastructure. Brazil has a real opportunity to be a global leader in aviation’s decarbonisation. Embracing this opportunity will create jobs, reduce dependence on foreign fossil fuels, build new energy and agriculture industries, and grow the economy. With the right policies implemented in the right order, Brazil is ready to jump-start the market,” said Willie Walsh, IATA Director General. Beyond feedstock availability, IATA emphasized that Brazil’s extensive experience in ethanol production and its established refining infrastructure provide substantial competitive advantages for SAF development. These strengths create a solid foundation for scaling production through Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) pathways and other advanced SAF technologies, particularly ethanol-to-jet fuel processes. The association believes this could eventually position Brazil as a net exporter of sustainable aviation fuel. IATA further noted that large-scale SAF production could generate substantial economic benefits across the entire value chain, including agriculture, feedstock cultivation, logistics, infrastructure development, refining, advanced fuel manufacturing and export activities. The association said such growth would support job creation, enhance energy independence and security, improve soil quality, strengthen natural capital and deliver benefits to local communities. Despite the country's significant potential, IATA acknowledged that SAF production in Brazil remains at an early stage and that achieving industrial-scale output will require several critical enablers. Among the priorities identified are investments in conversion technologies, expanded infrastructure and improved logistics networks to efficiently connect feedstock suppliers with fuel production facilities. IATA also called for targeted policy incentives designed to stimulate production, strengthen financing mechanisms and ensure alignment with internationally recognized sustainability standards. Another important element highlighted by the association is the implementation of a book-and-claim system based on tradable SAF certificates. IATA welcomed plans for Brazil’s Fuel of the Future framework (ProBioQAV) to incorporate such mechanisms alongside requirements for airline SAF usage. According to IATA, the approach would facilitate integration with international programs such as the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) while helping create a functioning SAF market. The association stressed that policy sequencing will be crucial, arguing that adequate SAF supply must be established before usage mandates take effect. “Brazil has many advantages both in terms of natural resources and vast experience that should give the country a world-leading role in SAF markets. The scale of Brazil’s potential is such that the economic rewards could be transformative. Applying tried and tested policies in the right order of sequence is necessary to achieve scale and the price reductions that come with it, but leapfrogging the building of supply chains and going straight for mandates will not. Aligning policies with global standards and programs such as CORSIA will allow Brazil to make the most of its great potential,” said Marie Owens Thomsen, IATA Senior Vice President Sustainability and Chief Economist. IATA's assessment underscores Brazil’s emerging role in the global sustainable aviation fuel sector, with the organization arguing that coordinated investment, supportive policy frameworks and industry collaboration could enable the country to become one of the world's most important SAF producers while supporting aviation's long-term decarbonisation goals.

IATA

IATA Says Brazil Has Potential To Become A Global Sustainable Aviation Fuel Leader

June 18, 2026

London, United Kingdom: The UK government has unveiled a new £219 million Low Carbon Fuels Fund (LCFF) aimed at accelerating domestic sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production, supporting economic growth, creating thousands of skilled jobs and strengthening the country's position as a global hub for low-carbon aviation fuels. Announced on June 16 by the Department for Transport, the funding programme will provide targeted support to companies developing low-carbon fuels, with £93 million set to be made available during the next two years. Applications are scheduled to open in mid-July 2026, with priority given to projects closest to commercial-scale production. The government said the initiative forms part of its wider strategy to decarbonise aviation while enabling continued sector growth. The new fund builds on £198 million already invested through the Advanced Fuels Fund (AFF) since 2022 to support cleaner aviation technologies. According to government estimates, domestic low-carbon fuel production could contribute up to £5 billion to the UK economy by 2050 while supporting approximately 15,000 jobs nationwide. Officials believe the investment will help attract private capital into new fuel production facilities and establish a stronger domestic SAF supply chain. Announcing the programme, Aviation, Maritime and Decarbonisation Minister Keir Mather said: "This £219 million is the next chapter in Britain's green aviation revolution. We're backing brilliant British innovation, creating thousands of high-skilled jobs and making sure the UK leads the world in the fuels that will power the future of flight. "This kind of investment is exactly how we kickstart economic growth, open up exciting new opportunities for young people and make our holidays greener and cleaner." The government described sustainable aviation fuel as one of the aviation sector's most important decarbonisation technologies. SAF can be used as an alternative to conventional fossil-based jet fuel and is estimated to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 70% on a lifecycle basis. Officials said expanding domestic production will provide confidence for investors considering new SAF plants across the country while generating employment opportunities in engineering, manufacturing, science, construction and fuel production. The announcement also highlights the government's objective of ensuring that aviation growth remains compatible with the UK's net-zero commitments. SAF is expected to play a central role in enabling future aviation expansion while reducing the industry's environmental impact. Alongside the funding announcement, the Department for Transport launched a Call for Evidence on the UK's Sustainable Aviation Fuel Mandate. The mandate requires an increasing proportion of jet fuel supplied in the UK to come from sustainable sources, beginning at 2% in 2025, rising to 10% by 2030 and reaching 22% by 2040. The government said the consultation will examine global supply projections for different sustainable fuel pathways and assess their implications for achieving future SAF mandate targets. Officials stressed that overall SAF mandate targets are not being considered for reduction. Instead, the review is intended to help ensure the policy remains effective and responsive as the global sustainable fuel market develops. Industry representatives welcomed the latest funding package. British Sugar, which previously received support through the Advanced Fuels Fund, said the company is exploring the development of a demonstration SAF production facility through its British BioJet project at the Wissington site. In a statement, the company said, "We are very pleased to see the launch of the DfT's low carbon fuels fund and the clear commitment to further development of homegrown sustainable aviation fuel in the UK. At British Sugar, following a grant from the advanced fuels fund, the British BioJet project at our Wissington site is exploring the development of a sizable demonstration plant. "It will utilise our existing waste feedstocks with ethanol-to-jet technology to produce 1,500 tonnes of SAF supporting the growth in cleaner, greener jobs and investment. We welcome this next phase of funding to develop SAF, and look forward to making an application so that we can continue supporting the government's ambition for net-zero aviation." The new Low Carbon Fuels Fund is expected to launch later this summer, with government officials positioning the initiative as a key component of the UK's long-term aviation decarbonisation strategy and industrial growth agenda.

United Kingdom

UK Launches £219 Million Fund To Boost Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production Growth

June 18, 2026

Tennessee, United States: Two brothers were killed when a small aircraft crashed in Warren County, Tennessee, on June 17, prompting a federal investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). According to Warren County Sheriff Jackie Matheny Jr., the aircraft departed from a private airstrip in the Viola community before crashing in a cornfield near Morrison Industrial Park, west of McMinnville. The crash site was located near Doyle Frazier Road in Morrison. Preliminary information released by the sheriff's office indicates investigators believe the aircraft may have struck a tree shortly after takeoff. Despite the apparent impact, the airplane continued flying for a short period before ultimately crashing while likely en route to Warren County Memorial Airport. Sheriff Matheny said the aircraft appeared to have entered a nose-down descent before impact, leaving behind a large debris field across the crash site. Family members confirmed that the victims were brothers from the Viola community. The aircraft involved was a Cessna 177RG Cardinal. Authorities confirmed that both occupants died in the accident. Emergency crews responded to the scene shortly after the crash was reported at approximately 12:19 p.m. local time. The accident occurred in a rural area near Morrison Industrial Park, and no injuries on the ground were reported. Federal investigators have now assumed responsibility for determining the cause of the accident. The NTSB is leading the investigation with assistance from the FAA. Investigators are expected to examine the wreckage, aircraft records, pilot information, weather conditions, and other factors as part of the inquiry. As of the latest reports, officials have not publicly released the names of the victims. Authorities have also not disclosed the aircraft's registration number or ownership information. The NTSB is expected to release a preliminary report in the coming weeks, while a final determination of probable cause could take considerably longer.

Aircraft Crashes

Two Brothers Killed In Tennessee Plane Crash After Aircraft Struck Tree

June 18, 2026

« Previous Next »

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Email

Recent News

New Delhi, India: The investigation into the crash of Air India flight AI-171 has entered its final stages, with the government telling Parliament that an advanced examination of the aircraft’s fuel control switch and its locking mechanism found no abnormality. However, the inspection of the complete thrust control module remains underway at the original equipment manufacturer's facility in Seattle. Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol provided the update during the Monsoon Session of Parliament on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, in response to questions in the Rajya Sabha. According to the Ministry of Civil Aviation's response, the tests were ordered by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) as part of continuing airworthiness checks after the Boeing 787 aircraft type was grounded in February this year. "A detailed examination of the fuel control switch, including the structural integrity of its locking detents, found no abnormality," Mohol said. The government further stated: "Inspection of the complete Thrust Control Module at the OEM's facility is underway." The finding is significant because the movement of the two engine fuel control switches has been a central focus of the investigation into the June 12, 2025 crash, which happened shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad. The aircraft came down in the Meghani Nagar area, killing 260 people, including 241 of the 242 people aboard the aircraft and 19 people on the ground. One passenger survived the crash. The preliminary investigation found that both switches moved from the RUN position to CUT OFF shortly after takeoff, resulting in the loss of thrust from both engines. The preliminary report, however, did not establish why the switches moved or assign responsibility for the movement. The latest examination has so far found no abnormality in the locking mechanism of the fuel control switch. However, the government has not said that the investigation has established the cause of the switches moving to the CUTOFF position. The complete thrust control module is still being examined, and the outcome of that inspection remains awaited. The government also rejected suggestions that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has delayed the final report into the crash. Mohol said investigations into major air accidents do not follow a fixed timeline and that the AI-171 inquiry is progressing in accordance with established investigation procedures. "All probable causes and contributing factors leading to the accident are being investigated," the minister said. The Ministry of Civil Aviation said the final investigation report will contain the findings of the probe and will be made public and uploaded on the AAIB's website once the investigation is completed. The preliminary report also noted that the aircraft had been certified as airworthy before the flight and that its maintenance records did not show a reported defect involving the fuel control switches. It also recorded that the aircraft's throttle control module had previously been replaced, although the replacements were unrelated to reported fuel-switch defects. The investigation subsequently drew international attention because the fuel control switches are part of the Boeing 787's thrust control system and are designed with locking mechanisms intended to prevent unintended movement. The latest government statement indicates that the structural integrity of the locking detents has now been examined and that no abnormality was identified in that specific component. However, the government has not yet released a final conclusion on what caused the switches to move during the AI-171 flight. The continuing inspection of the complete thrust control module is therefore an important remaining part of the technical examination. The AAIB's final report is expected to establish the complete sequence of events, identify the causes and contributing factors, and determine whether any safety recommendations are required. Until the final report is released, the precise cause of the fuel control switches moving to CUTOFF remains unresolved in the publicly available investigation findings. The latest government update therefore clears one specific area of concern: the fuel control switch locking mechanism but does not, by itself, close the wider question of why both switches moved to the CUTOFF position shortly after takeoff. The investigation remains ongoing, with the complete thrust control module examination and the AAIB's final assessment is still pending.

Govt Says Air India AI171 Crash Probe Finds No Fault In Fuel Switch Locking Mechanism

July 29, 2026

DAE Completes $9B Macquarie AirFinance Deal, Becomes World's 3rd-Largest Aircraft Lessor

DAE Completes $9B Macquarie AirFinance Deal, Becomes World’s 3rd-Largest Aircraft Lessor

July 29, 2026

Airbus Completes Longest-Ever A350-1000 ULR Development Flight Ahead Of Project Sunrise SEO DES: Airbus' A350-1000 ULR test aircraft completed a record 24-hour, 24-minute nonstop development flight covering 12,460 nautical miles from Melbourne to Toulouse SOCIAL: Airbus’ A350-1000 ULR test aircraft MSN707 completed a record 24-hour-24-minute nonstop development flight from Melbourne, Australia, to Toulouse, France, covering 12,460 nautical miles. The flight was part of Airbus’ two-part development programme supporting Qantas’ Project Sunrise ultra-long-haul operations. The test evaluated the aircraft’s fuel-management systems, rear centre tank, cabin comfort, air-conditioning and new twin Flight Crew Rest Compartment. Pilots also followed specialised fatigue-management procedures, while Qantas pilots gained experience flying the A350-1000 ULR variant. The flight involved Airbus and Qantas pilots and flight-test engineers, with the aircraft following a route across the Pacific, North America and the Atlantic. The mission is expected to help validate the A350-1000 ULR for future nonstop commercial services connecting Australia with Europe and North America. Toulouse, France: Airbus has completed the longest flight ever flown by its A350-1000 ULR flight-test aircraft MSN707, with the specially instrumented MSN707 flying nonstop from Melbourne, Australia, to Toulouse, France, for 24 hours and 24 minutes. The aircraft covered 12,460 nautical miles (23,075 km or 14,338 miles) before landing in Toulouse on the morning of July 28, 2026. The flight was part of a two-part development flight-test programme. On July 23, MSN707 departed Toulouse on its longest point-to-point flight to Melbourne. A few days later, the aircraft began its return journey to Toulouse, carrying two Qantas guest pilots alongside the Airbus test crew. Airbus said the return flight was technically classified as a development test rather than a certification flight. The programme is designed to demonstrate the A350-1000ULR's ability to complete a 23-hour block-time mission. Block time runs from the release of the parking brake at departure until the aircraft reaches its arrival stand and is intended to provide sufficient operational margin around the planned 21-hour-40-minute flight time for Qantas' forthcoming Project Sunrise routes, including time for holding, diversion and taxiing. The aircraft is powered by two Rolls-Royce Trent XWB-97 engines and features an additional rear centre tank (RCT) with a 20,900-litre fuel capacity. The tank is designed to support ultra-long-range operations covering almost 10,000 nautical miles. During the flight, Airbus used the fully fueled RCT to validate remaining test points and assess fuel-management systems, while also evaluating cabin comfort and air-conditioning performance. Airbus Test Pilot Xavier Pepin, who served as captain on the record-setting return leg, said the first, approximately 20-hour leg was used to stabilise various cabin air-temperature settings for accurate measurements. The return flight then allowed the team to address backup test points that could not be completed during the first leg. The flight also evaluated the A350-1000ULR's new twin Flight Crew Rest Compartment. The specially designed facility has two separate sections with individual entrances, allowing pilots to access their respective rest areas without disturbing one another during airline operations. However, because the compartments were occupied by ventilation-measurement equipment during the test, the crew instead used the aircraft's eight-berth rear cabin-crew rest compartment for sleeping. The return flight from Melbourne followed a route across the Pacific toward Los Angeles, over the United States and Canada, and across the Atlantic south of Greenland before passing over the UK and continuing to southern France. Airbus selected a more northerly Atlantic routing to avoid potential air-traffic-control issues that could arise if published airline tracks were not updated before departure, potentially resulting in mismatched flight plans. Fatigue management was another key element of the ultra-long-range test. Airbus said pilots worked four-hour shifts but rotated every two hours, creating a two-hour overlap between the incoming and outgoing pilots. The arrangement was intended to support detailed handovers and maintain situational awareness throughout the 20- to 23-hour missions. On the return flight, at least one Airbus test pilot remained in a pilot seat whenever a Qantas pilot occupied the other seat, as Airbus retained operational responsibility for the mission. The schedule also allowed the Qantas pilots to take the controls at designated times. Both were already qualified on the A350 but were experiencing the A350-1000 ULR variant for the first time. The return flight was commanded by Airbus Test Pilot Xavier Pepin. Two Qantas pilots, Captain Andrew Coull and Captain David Summergreene, joined the mission, while one Airbus pilot from the outbound crew disembarked. Five pilots were therefore aboard for the return leg: three Airbus pilots and the two Qantas pilots. The two Test-Flight Engineers, Laurent Rossignol and Nicolas Granier, and three Flight-Test Engineers, Tuan Do, Alexia Plummet and Jaime Angoloti, remained on board for the return flight. The outbound leg had been led by Airbus Test Pilot Vincent Sibelle, who served as captain and was responsible for the overall mission organisation. The other Airbus pilots were Xavier Pepin, Josef Bayoud and Chetan Takalkar. The two Test-Flight Engineers monitored aircraft systems from the cockpit, while the three Flight-Test Engineers worked from stations in the main cabin, coordinating tests including cabin-comfort and fuel monitoring. The MSN707 test aircraft first flew on June 2, 2026, and is equipped with specialised instrumentation for the development programme. The latest flight is intended to help validate the aircraft's capabilities and systems ahead of its planned use for Qantas' Project Sunrise ultra-long-haul operations. The flight also attracted significant public attention. Reuters reported that more than 3.6 million people tracked the aircraft online, making it the second-most-followed flight ever on Flightradar24. The test demonstrated the potential of the A350-1000 ULR to support nonstop commercial services linking Australia's east coast with destinations in Europe and North America. The Melbourne-Toulouse development flight marks a major milestone in the testing of an aircraft designed to make some of the world's longest commercial passenger flights possible. Airbus' latest test programme is focused not only on endurance and fuel management but also on cabin conditions, crew-rest arrangements and operational procedures required for missions lasting more than 20 hours.

Airbus Completes Longest-Ever A350-1000 ULR Development Flight Ahead Of Project Sunrise

July 29, 2026

American Eagle Flight 5816 Diverts To Norfolk After Reported Smoke In Cabin

July 29, 2026

Washington, United States: The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on July 27, 2026, proposed inspections of passenger seat assemblies on 453 U.S.-registered Boeing 737 MAX aircraft after receiving a report that some seats may not have been correctly installed in their floor tracks. The proposed Airworthiness Directive (AD) applies to certain Boeing 737-8, 737-9 and 737-8200 aircraft. According to the FAA, the issue involves track-mounted passenger seat assemblies whose aft fitting shear plungers may not have been correctly lowered and engaged in the seat tracks. The regulator said an incorrectly installed seat assembly could disengage from the seat tracks under increased loads, during turbulence or in an emergency landing. The FAA warned that, if the condition is not corrected, it could result in injuries to passengers or crew during an emergency landing or block an aisle and slow an evacuation. The FAA said the proposed directive would require operators to conduct a detailed inspection of the seat-track fittings on each left- and right-side track-mounted passenger seat assembly to verify that they are correctly installed. Any required corrective action would also have to be carried out. "There could be up to 69 track-mounted passenger seat assemblies on each 737 MAX plane," according to details cited in the FAA proposal. The agency estimates one work-hour for the required action per affected seat assembly, with the inspection and corrective work expected to cost operators about $85 per seat assembly. The FAA estimates the total inspection cost for U.S. operators at up to $2.66 million, while Boeing has indicated that some or all costs associated with the proposed AD may be covered under warranty. The FAA's proposed rule was prompted by Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1927 RB, dated December 10, 2025. Boeing had previously provided guidance to operators on the issue, and the FAA is now proposing to make the required inspections and corrective actions mandatory. The agency said it had determined that the unsafe condition identified in the report is likely to exist or develop on other aircraft of the same type design. The proposal does not currently indicate that all 453 aircraft have incorrectly installed seats. Instead, the FAA is proposing inspections to determine whether the seat assemblies are correctly secured and to require corrective action where necessary. The FAA has set September 10, 2026, as the deadline for public comments on the proposed directive. The agency will consider comments before deciding whether to issue a final Airworthiness Directive. The FAA proposal itself does not identify a specific accident or injury linked to the seat installation issue. Rather, the regulator is acting on the potential safety risk posed by a seat assembly becoming disengaged from its track during high-load conditions. The development comes as the FAA continues heightened oversight of Boeing's production and quality-control processes. On July 17, 2026, the agency announced that Boeing would be allowed to resume issuing airworthiness certificates for all newly produced 737 MAX and 787 aircraft from July 20, following months of FAA review of production quality data. The latest seat-track proposal is therefore another regulatory action focused on ensuring that aircraft meet approved design and safety requirements, but it does not amount to a grounding order or an immediate suspension of 737 MAX operations.

FAA Proposes Seat Inspections For 453 Boeing 737 MAX Jets Over Installation Issue

July 28, 2026

Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - PART 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Citywide Networks Must Be Designed Around Real Travel Patterns

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 3

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Part 2- Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 2

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube