Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

Search

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

flight anomaly

Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Cathay Pacific Airways flight CX449, bound for Hong Kong from Kaohsiung International Airport in Taiwan, was forced to return to its departure airport on Sunday morning after an engine system alert indicated a possible technical issue, airline and aviation sources confirmed. The Airbus A321neo, scheduled to depart at 7:45 am local time with about 200 passengers on board, took off as planned but turned back shortly after take-off when cockpit instruments showed an abnormal reading related to one of the engines. The aircraft landed safely back in Kaohsiung at around 8:26 am to 8:49 am under standard safety procedures, according to reports. Preliminary inspections by technical teams at Kaohsiung indicated that a lubricant (engine oil) leak in one engine likely caused the pressure anomaly and triggered the warning that prompted the turn-back. Maintenance crews estimated around two hours would be needed to clear any spilled oil and carry out targeted system checks before deciding on the aircraft’s next steps. Cathay Pacific described the incident only as a “technical issue” in its official comment, without confirming specific engine fault details in its public statement, while emphasising that safety considerations guided the decision to return. Taiwanese media reports also referenced the engine oil leak as the apparent cause. All passengers disembarked normally after the aircraft returned to Kaohsiung. Cathay Pacific ground staff assisted travellers by rebooking them onto alternative flights to Hong Kong later the same day. Ground teams reportedly provided meal vouchers and refreshments and worked to restore schedule stability by deploying aircraft with higher seating capacity where possible. The airline also issued an apology to affected customers and thanked them for their patience while disruptions were managed. The A321neo involved in the flight has been grounded at Kaohsiung while further detailed inspections and any necessary engineering work are carried out. Safety officials and airline engineers are continuing to examine the affected engine to determine the full technical cause of the pressure and oil leak anomaly. Cathay Pacific said the crew followed standard procedures in responding to the alert, underlining the airline’s commitment to operational safety.

Cathay Pacific Flight A321neo Turns Back To Kaohsiung After Suspected Engine Oil Leak

Aviation Today News Desk / February 2, 2026

Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Cathay Pacific Airways flight CX449, bound for Hong Kong from Kaohsiung International Airport in Taiwan, was forced to […]

Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong’s Air Accident Investigation Authority (AAIA) has released its preliminary findings into last month’s fatal runway excursion involving an Emirates SkyCargo Boeing 747-481BDSF, operated by ACT Airlines, which veered off Runway 07L and plunged into the sea at Hong Kong International Airport on 20 October. The newly published report provides the first detailed account of the aircraft’s final moments but stops short of assigning cause, in line with international aviation investigation standards. According to the AAIA, the freighter, operating as flight UAE9788 from Dubai World Central, completed a routine approach to Runway 07L shortly before 4 a.m. local time. The co-pilot had control of the aircraft during the landing, while the captain served as pilot monitoring. Weather conditions at the time were favourable, with visibility exceeding 10 kilometres and all navigation, communication, and surveillance systems functioning normally. No foreign object debris or airfield irregularities were reported prior to the landing. After touchdown, the aircraft began decelerating as expected until an “AUTOBRAKES” alert appeared on the Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System. In response, the captain immediately took control of the aircraft. Within moments, the 747 began an uncommanded drift to the left and subsequently departed the runway surface abeam Taxiway C6. The aircraft broke through the airfield perimeter fence and collided with a stationary airport security vehicle positioned on the service road outside the runway boundary. The force of the impact pushed the patrol vehicle into the sea, killing both security personnel inside. The 747 continued forward and came to rest partially submerged in the waters adjacent to the airport. Its tail section had separated during the violent sequence, and the aircraft was declared destroyed. All four crew members survived without injury. The preliminary report reveals critical details from the flight data recorder that may help explain the aircraft’s sudden loss of directional control. Investigators confirmed that the aircraft had been dispatched under the Minimum Equipment List with the No. 4 engine thrust reverser inoperative, a condition permissible under the operator’s regulatory framework. While engines No. 2 and 3 entered reverse thrust at approximately 95% N1 and engine No. 1 entered idle reverse, engine No. 4 behaved abnormally. Instead of providing reverse or idle thrust, the outboard right engine began accelerating rapidly in the forward direction, reaching 90% N1 shortly after touchdown. Within seconds, it surged even further, climbing to more than 106% N1 before the aircraft left the runway. The strong forward thrust from a single engine created a severe asymmetry during the critical landing roll. When investigators examined the flight deck after the accident, they found the thrust levers for engines 1, 2, and 3 fully closed with their reverse levers deployed to maximum. However, the No. 4 engine thrust lever was discovered in the full forward position, with its reverse lever also fully forward an unusual configuration that will be a major focus of the ongoing inquiry. The speed brake lever was in the flight detent position, and the autobrake selector had disarmed during the landing roll. The AAIA has already completed extensive work, including securing and analysing the wreckage, retrieving the flight recorders, reviewing air traffic control surveillance data, studying foreign object debris detection reports, and interviewing both the flight crew and duty controllers. The investigation is now concentrating on several areas: the technical behaviour of the aircraft’s systems and engines at the time of the accident, the source and implications of the forward movement of the No. 4 thrust lever, the performance of the aircraft’s braking and thrust-reversing systems, and potential human factors. Investigators are also reviewing maintenance records, operational procedures, and the airline’s safety management practices. The AAIA emphasised that the objective of the investigation is to prevent future accidents and not to apportion blame. A final report addressing the causes and contributing factors will be issued once the analysis is complete, a process that could take up to a year.

AAIA Issues Initial Findings On Deadly Emirates 747 Runway Excursion In Hong Kong

Aviation Today News Desk / November 19, 2025

Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong’s Air Accident Investigation Authority (AAIA) has released its preliminary findings into last month’s fatal runway

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

error: Unauthorized copying is not permitted

Search

About Us
News
Pilot Training
Civil Aviation
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube