Latest Aviation News | Updated Global Aviation News

Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

Latest News

Smoke From Vape Device Triggers Emergency Response On Virgin Australia Flight SEO DES: The smoke originated from a vape or e-cigarette device that activated and began emitting smoke inside the cabin shortly before landing in Melbourne SOCIAL: A vape device emitting smoke onboard Virgin Australia Flight VA328 triggered an emergency response at Melbourne Airport. The Boeing 737-8FE operating from Brisbane Airport declared a PAN call during descent after smoke appeared in the cabin. Cabin crew quickly located the overheating vape device and contained it using onboard fire-response procedures. Emergency services and aviation rescue firefighters were positioned on standby as the aircraft approached the airport. The flight landed safely at around 4:25 p.m. local time, after which firefighters boarded the aircraft to remove the device and ensure there was no further fire risk. Image: Bidgee (Wikimedia) Video: Virgin Australia Melbourne, Australia: Emergency services were deployed at Melbourne Airport after smoke from a vape device onboard a Virgin Australia passenger flight prompted an urgent response shortly before landing, authorities confirmed on Sunday. The incident occurred on Virgin Australia Flight VA328, operated by a Boeing 737-8FE, which was flying from Brisbane Airport to Melbourne. Smoke was reported in the aircraft cabin during the aircraft’s descent into Melbourne, prompting the flight crew to declare a “PAN” call, a standard aviation alert indicating an urgent situation that requires priority handling but is less severe than a mayday emergency. According to airport officials, the smoke originated from a vape or e-cigarette device that activated and began emitting smoke inside the cabin shortly before landing. A passenger alerted the cabin crew after noticing vapour and smoke coming from the device. The crew quickly moved to contain the unit in accordance with onboard fire-response procedures. Emergency services were placed on standby at Melbourne Airport as the aircraft approached. Aviation Rescue Firefighters followed the aircraft after landing and boarded the plane as a precaution to remove the device and ensure there was no continuing fire risk. The aircraft landed safely at approximately 4:25 p.m. local time, and all passengers and crew disembarked normally. Authorities confirmed that no injuries were reported during the incident. In a statement, Virgin Australia said the safety of passengers and crew remains its highest priority, and thanked the flight crew for their swift actions in managing the situation and containing the device before it escalated. Vaping devices contain lithium batteries, which can pose a fire hazard if damaged, overheated, or poorly manufactured. When such batteries fail, they can enter a condition known as “thermal runaway,” in which internal reactions rapidly generate heat, smoke, and flames. The batteries used in disposable or low-cost vape devices may be more prone to failure than those used in larger consumer electronics. Some devices also lack safety features designed to prevent accidental activation or overheating. Because of these risks, airlines require electronic smoking devices to be carried only in cabin baggage, allowing crew members to quickly respond if a device overheats or ignites during flight. Airlines typically prohibit these devices from being placed in checked baggage because a fire in the cargo hold can be difficult to detect and extinguish during flight.

Incidents

Smoke From Vape Device Triggers Emergency Response On Virgin Australia Flight

March 16, 2026

Military Aviation

US Confirms Six Airmen Killed After KC-135 Refueling Aircraft Crash In Western Iraq

March 16, 2026

Nearly 12 Years On, New Search Fails to Find Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 Wreckage SEO DES: On 8 March 2014, the Boeing 777-200ER, carrying 239 people, vanished less than an hour after departing Kuala Lumpur for Beijing SOCIAL: Nearly 12 years after Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 disappeared on 8 March 2014, the latest deep-sea search in the southern Indian Ocean has ended without locating the aircraft’s wreckage. The Boeing 777-200ER, carrying 239 people, vanished less than an hour after departing Kuala Lumpur for Beijing, and investigators believe it diverted before crashing in the ocean. Massive multinational searches between 2014 and 2017 and a renewed 2025–2026 mission by Ocean Infinity under a “no find, no fee” agreement failed to find the main wreckage, though some debris washed ashore on Indian Ocean islands. Meanwhile, a Beijing court ordered Malaysia Airlines to pay about 2.9 million yuan in compensation to families of eight victims, while relatives and advocacy group Voice370 continue urging authorities to extend search efforts for the aircraft. Image: Laurent ERRERA (Flickr) Video: Malaysia Airlines Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Nearly 12 years after Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 vanished from radar on 8 March 2014, the latest deep‑sea search has ended without locating the aircraft’s wreckage, leaving one of modern aviation’s greatest mysteries unresolved and families of the missing urging renewed efforts. Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, a Boeing 777‑200ER registered as 9M‑MRO, departed Kuala Lumpur International Airport at 00:41 local time bound for Beijing with 239 people on board including passengers and crew from more than a dozen countries. Less than an hour after takeoff, the flight’s transponder and primary communications stopped transmitting. The aircraft disappeared from radar screens and was never seen again in normal flight tracking. Investigators later concluded from satellite data that MH370 likely diverted from its planned path westwards over the Strait of Malacca, continued for several hours, and ultimately went down in the southern Indian Ocean. In 2014, authorities from Malaysia, Australia and China launched the largest ocean search in aviation history, focusing on an area of the remote southern Indian Ocean based on satellite signal analysis. Aircraft, ships and underwater sonar scanning were deployed for years. Australia led an extensive seabed search that covered over 120,000 square kilometres, but found no main wreckage. That phase officially ended in January 2017. In the meantime, debris confirmed to be from MH370 washed ashore on various Indian Ocean coastlines, including Réunion Island, Mozambique and Madagascar. These pieces provided some confirmation of the aircraft’s fate but not the crash location. A 2018 Malaysian investigative report into the disappearance was inconclusive, failing to determine a definitive cause but leaving open the possibility that the aircraft was deliberately diverted from its flight path. After a long hiatus, the Malaysian government entered into a no find, no fee” agreement with marine exploration company Ocean Infinity meaning the firm would be paid up to US $70 million only if the wreckage was located. On 25 March 2025, Malaysia signed the agreement and identified a new search area of approximately 15,000 square kilometres of the southern Indian Ocean seabed. Search operations under this accord were conducted in two phases from March 25–28, 2025, and later from 31 December 2025 until 23 January 2026 resulting in 28 operational days scanning around 7,571 square kilometres of seabed using autonomous underwater drones and advanced sonar mapping. Despite these efforts, officials confirmed that the mission ended in January 2026 without any confirmed findings that would pinpoint the aircraft’s wreckage or flight recorders. The conclusion of the latest search, announced as the 12th anniversary of the disappearance approached, prompted renewed calls from families of the passengers and crew for continued efforts. The Chaoyang District People’s Court in Beijing ordered Malaysia Airlines and its international affiliate to pay over 2.9 million yuan (about US $410,000) in compensation to each of the families of eight passengers from Flight MH370 who were declared legally deceased. The award covers death compensation, funeral costs and damages for emotional distress, marking the first formal Chinese court decision on compensation for victims of the 2014 disappearance. Of the original 78 lawsuits filed by relatives of missing passengers, 47 were settled and withdrawn earlier, while 23 cases remain pending because some families have not completed the legal procedures to have passengers declared dead. The ruling comes as renewed search efforts for the aircraft resume in the southern Indian Ocean. Advocacy group Voice370 and relatives said they remain determined to pursue further search operations and urged the Malaysian government to extend Ocean Infinity’s contract beyond its planned expiry in mid‑2026. They also suggested considering other exploration firms under similar terms. In open letters, relatives criticised gaps in communication during the recent search and expressed ongoing grief over the lack of closure. With no confirmed discovery after repeated multinational search efforts spanning more than a decade, MH370 remains one of the most enduring mysteries in aviation. The Malaysian government has stated it will continue to keep families informed and assess future search possibilities.

Investigation

Nearly 12 Years On, New Search Fails to Find Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 Wreckage

March 15, 2026

Jeju Air Crash Probe Finds Airport Structure May Have Worsened Deadly 2024 Disaster SEO DES: Investigators say the structure failed international standards requiring frangible supports, suggesting the crash might have been survivable otherwise SOCIAL: Investigations into the December 2024 crash of Jeju Air Flight 2216 at Muan International Airport, South Korea, have linked the disaster to longstanding airport infrastructure safety failures. The Boeing 737-800 belly-landed after a suspected bird strike but overran the runway and struck a rigid concrete embankment supporting a navigation localiser antenna, causing a catastrophic fire that killed 179 of the 181 people on board. Investigators say the structure did not meet international safety standards requiring frangible supports that break on impact, suggesting the crash may have been survivable otherwise. South Korea’s government has acknowledged the safety lapse, launched an independent inquiry, and begun reviewing runway infrastructure nationwide while a final investigation report is expected in 2026. Image: Aero Time Video: TOI Muan, South Korea: Investigations into the 2024 crash of a Jeju Air passenger jet in South Korea have revealed that longstanding airport infrastructure failures likely played a critical role in turning a survivable emergency landing into the country’s deadliest aviation disaster. Jeju Air Flight 2216, a Boeing 737-800 operating from Bangkok to Muan, crashed at Muan International Airport on 29 December 2024, killing 179 of the 181 people on board. Only two cabin crew members survived the accident. Recent findings cited in a government-commissioned report suggest that the aircraft’s occupants may have survived if the plane had not collided with a rigid concrete structure located at the end of the runway. The aircraft had belly-landed during an emergency approach and slid beyond the runway before striking a concrete mound supporting a navigation localiser antenna, triggering a catastrophic fire. The concrete embankment that the aircraft struck has become a central focus of the investigation. Structural simulations conducted after the accident indicated that the impact with the runway overrun itself was survivable and that the aircraft could have come to a halt with far fewer casualties if the structure had been designed to break on impact. Experts and lawmakers have argued that the structure did not meet international aviation safety standards, which typically require runway navigation equipment to be mounted on “frangible” supports designed to collapse during an aircraft collision. South Korea’s transport authorities later acknowledged that the embankment contributed to the severity of the crash and announced plans to remove or redesign similar structures at several airports across the country. Opposition lawmakers have also blamed decades of government negligence, noting that the problematic structure had existed since the late 1990s without corrective action despite safety concerns. Investigators believe the emergency landing was triggered by a bird strike during the aircraft’s final approach. Remains of birds were found in both engines during the preliminary investigation. Evidence later indicated that the pilots may have inadvertently shut down the less-damaged engine after the bird strike, potentially reducing available thrust during the emergency landing attempt. The aircraft ultimately landed without deploying its landing gear and slid along the runway before colliding with the concrete structure at the runway’s end, leading to an explosion and fire that destroyed the aircraft. The disaster has triggered widespread criticism of the investigation process and government oversight of aviation safety. Families of the victims have accused authorities of delaying reports and failing to provide transparency about the causes of the crash. In response to mounting pressure, South Korea’s parliament approved an independent inquiry to examine the accident, including the role of bird strikes, possible mechanical failures, and the runway structure that the aircraft struck. South Korea’s Transport Ministry has also acknowledged that a navigation structure at Muan International Airport failed to meet safety standards, contributing to the deadly crash of a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 in December 2024. Authorities admitted the structure should have been designed to break on impact, in line with international safety guidelines, and its rigid construction likely worsened the disaster. A final report from investigators is expected in 2026, as officials continue to analyze flight data, cockpit recordings and infrastructure safety standards. The tragedy remains the deadliest aviation accident in South Korean history and has prompted a nationwide review of runway safety areas and navigation equipment installations at airports across the country.

Investigation

Jeju Air Crash Probe Finds Airport Structure May Have Worsened Deadly 2024 Disaster

March 14, 2026

IATA: Global Airline Accident Rate Improved In 2025 Despite Higher Fatal Accidents SEO DES: The accident rate improved to 1.32 per million flights in 2025 but eight fatal accidents caused 394 deaths, up from 244 in 2024 despite fewer total accidents SOCIAL: The global airline industry maintained strong overall safety in 2025, despite an increase in fatal accidents and fatalities, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA) annual safety report released on March 9, 2026. The overall accident rate improved to 1.32 accidents per million flights, down from 1.42 in 2024, while airlines conducted 38.7 million flights with 51 accidents recorded. However, eight fatal accidents resulted in 394 deaths, up from 244 in 2024. IATA highlighted that aviation remains one of the safest modes of transport, with safety improvements over the past decade and significant benefits from the IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) program. Regional accident trends varied, with Asia-Pacific and North Asia showing low rates, though runway-related incidents and operational challenges in conflict zones remain concerns. The report emphasized the importance of global safety standards, frangible runway structures, timely accident reporting, and international cooperation. Despite the rise in fatalities, long-term trends confirm continuous improvements in aviation safety worldwide. Geneva, Switzerland: The global airline industry continued to demonstrate a strong safety record in 2025, even as fatalities increased compared with the previous year, according to the latest annual safety report released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA). The report, published on March 9, 2026, provides a comprehensive overview of accident trends, operational risks, and regional safety performance across the global aviation sector. While overall accident rates improved compared with 2024, the number of fatal accidents and fatalities rose, highlighting the continued need for vigilance and industry-wide cooperation to further enhance aviation safety. According to IATA’s analysis, the overall accident rate in 2025 was 1.32 accidents per million flights, equivalent to one accident for every 759,646 flights. This represents an improvement from 1.42 accidents per million flights recorded in 2024, although the figure was slightly worse than the five-year average of 1.27 accidents per million flights for the period 2021–2025. Airlines worldwide conducted 38.7 million flights in 2025, during which 51 accidents were recorded. This marked a modest improvement compared with 54 accidents in 2024, when airlines operated 37.9 million flights, but it remained higher than the five-year average of 44 accidents. Despite the improvement in the overall accident rate, eight fatal accidents occurred in 2025, up from seven fatal accidents in 2024 and above the five-year average of six fatal accidents. IATA reported eight fatal airline accidents in 2025, causing 394 deaths, with Air India Flight 171 (241) and PSA Airlines Flight 5342 (64) accounting for over 77% of the fatalities. As a result, the number of fatalities rose sharply to 394 in 2025, compared with 244 fatalities in 2024 and the five-year average of 198 deaths. Commenting on the report, Willie Walsh, Director General of IATA, emphasized that aviation remains one of the safest modes of transportation globally. “Flying is the safest way to travel long distances. Accidents are extremely rare. But every accident reminds us that we must continue to improve through global standards and data-driven collaboration on safety,” Walsh said. He noted that safety performance has improved significantly over the past decade. Between 2012 and 2016, the industry recorded one fatal accident for every 3.5 million flights. Over the 2021–2025 period, this improved to one fatal accident per 5.6 million flights, reflecting advances in safety management systems, data sharing, and operational standards. Walsh added that the scale of modern aviation means even a single accident can influence annual statistics. “With nearly 40 million flights taking place annually, even one accident can affect global results. Nevertheless, one accident is always one too many. The aviation industry’s goal remains zero accidents and zero fatalities,” he said. The report also highlighted the role of the IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) program in maintaining high safety standards. Airlines listed in the IOSA registry recorded significantly lower accident rates compared with non-IOSA airlines, reinforcing the importance of globally recognized operational safety standards. All IATA member airlines that meet the eligibility requirements must maintain IOSA certification, which requires periodic safety audits and operational assessments. IATA said the results once again demonstrate the value of globally harmonized safety frameworks in reducing operational risk. The report also examined regional accident rates and operational safety performance across major aviation markets. In the Asia-Pacific region, airlines recorded six accidents in 2025, with the overall accident rate improving compared with the previous year. In North Asia, the accident rate remained extremely low at 0.16 accidents per million flights, although the region recorded one fatal accident during the year. IATA noted that accident trends vary widely by region due to differences in infrastructure, operational conditions, and regulatory oversight. Runway-related incidents continued to represent a significant portion of aviation accidents. The report highlighted that solid structures and obstacles located near runways can increase the severity of accidents, particularly during runway overruns or landing incidents. IATA stressed the importance of adopting frangible structures near runways, which are designed to break upon impact and reduce the consequences of aircraft collisions during accidents. Improving runway safety infrastructure remains a key priority for regulators, airport operators, and airlines worldwide. Another emerging challenge identified in the report is the growing number of global conflict zones, which has increased operational complexity for airlines. Military activity and airspace restrictions in certain regions have forced airlines to reroute flights, leading to longer flight paths and more complex operational planning. IATA urged governments and international agencies to ensure airlines receive timely and accurate information on potential security risks, allowing operators to make informed decisions about flight routes and operational safety. The report also reflected gaps in accident investigation and reporting compliance among some countries. Under international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), countries are required to publish accident investigation reports within specific timelines. However, compliance varies widely across regions. According to IATA, the European Union and surrounding region achieved a compliance rate of 82%, while other regions recorded lower levels: North America: 70% Asia-Pacific: 68% North Asia: 67% Middle East and North Africa: 67% Latin America and the Caribbean: 57% Africa: 20% Delayed or incomplete accident reports limit the ability of the aviation industry to learn from incidents and implement preventive measures, the report noted. Despite the increase in fatalities in 2025, IATA stressed that aviation safety continues to improve over the long term through data-driven risk management, international cooperation, and standardized safety frameworks. The organization said maintaining and strengthening global safety standards remains essential as the aviation sector continues to expand and air traffic grows worldwide.

IATA

IATA: Global Airline Accident Rate Improved In 2025 Despite Higher Fatal Accidents

March 14, 2026

Qantas Airways To Pay A$105 Million To Settle COVID Flight Cancellation Lawsuit SEO DES: The lawsuit also alleged the airline engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unlawfully retained customers’ money for extended periods SOCIAL: Qantas Airways has agreed to pay A$105 million (about US$74 million) to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by passengers over COVID-19 flight cancellations, after customers said the airline issued travel credits instead of cash refunds. The case, filed by Echo Law, covers domestic and international flights cancelled between January 2020 and November 2022. Passengers alleged the airline breached contractual obligations and engaged in misleading conduct by failing to promptly refund cancelled tickets. Under the proposed settlement, the airline will make the payment without admitting liability, and the agreement must still receive approval from the Federal Court of Australia. If approved, compensation will be distributed through a court-appointed administrator to hundreds of thousands of affected travelers, with payouts expected to vary depending on ticket values and individual claims. The settlement is expected to help close one of the largest pandemic-era disputes over airline refund policies. Sydney, Australia: Australian flag carrier Qantas Airways has agreed to pay A$105 million (about US$74 million) to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by customers over cancelled flights during the COVID-19 pandemic, bringing an end to a long-running dispute over the airline’s refund practices. The settlement, announced on March 13, 2026, relates to domestic and international flights scheduled between January 1, 2020 and November 1, 2022 that were cancelled as global travel restrictions disrupted aviation worldwide. Instead of issuing cash refunds, the airline had provided passengers with travel credits, prompting legal challenges from affected customers. The case was brought in 2023 by Australian law firm Echo Law on behalf of hundreds of thousands of passengers who claimed the airline breached contractual obligations by failing to promptly refund cancelled tickets. The lawsuit also alleged the airline engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unlawfully retained customers’ money for extended periods. Under the proposed agreement, Qantas will pay the A$105 million settlement without admitting liability. The deal must still receive approval from the Federal Court of Australia, after which eligible customers will be notified about how to claim their compensation. If approved, the funds will be distributed to affected passengers through a court-appointed administrator. Payments could begin once the settlement process is finalized, with compensation amounts varying depending on the cost of the original ticket and how long customers were deprived of their funds. Echo Law partner Andrew Paull said the settlement represents a meaningful outcome for travelers affected by pandemic-era cancellations, noting that the compensation will be shared among hundreds of thousands of passengers. Typical payouts could amount to hundreds of dollars, though exact sums will depend on the number of claims submitted and the value of cancelled bookings. The dispute stemmed from the airline’s decision during the pandemic to issue flight credits rather than immediate cash refunds, a policy that drew widespread criticism from customers and consumer advocates. During the COVID-19 crisis, airlines around the world faced massive cancellations and severe financial pressure, leading many carriers to rely on travel vouchers or credits to manage cash flow. Facing mounting backlash, Qantas later removed the expiry dates on its COVID-era travel credits, allowing passengers to request refunds indefinitely. However, the class action continued, arguing that the airline should have provided refunds earlier under Australian consumer law. The settlement may help the airline draw a line under a series of controversies that have affected its reputation since the pandemic, including legal disputes and regulatory scrutiny over customer service and operational practices.

Airlines

Qantas Airways To Pay A$105 Million To Settle COVID Flight Cancellation Lawsuit

March 13, 2026

IndiGo Tops India In Pilot Numbers But Has Lowest Pilot-To-Aircraft Ratio At 7.6 SEO DES: SpiceJet has the highest pilots per aircraft, followed by Akasa Air, Air India and Air India Express, while IndiGo ranks lowest among major Indian airlines SOCIAL: The government said IndiGo has the lowest pilot-to-aircraft ratio among Indian airlines at 7.6, meaning about eight pilots per aircraft. Other airlines have higher ratios: SpiceJet (9.4), Akasa Air (9.33), Air India (9.1), and Air India Express (8.8). IndiGo employs about 5,200 pilots, including 970 women, the highest among domestic carriers. Other airlines employ 3,123 pilots at Air India, 1,820 at Air India Express, 761 at Akasa Air, and 375 at SpiceJet. The disclosure comes after IndiGo CEO Pieter Elbers resigned on March 10 following flight disruptions in December 2025 that affected about 3 lakh passengers. The DGCA fined the airline ₹22.20 crore over operational lapses. New Delhi, India: India’s largest airline IndiGo has the lowest pilot-to-aircraft ratio among domestic carriers, the government informed Parliament, highlighting staffing disparities across the country’s aviation sector. The data also reveals six major domestic airlines in India together employ 13,989 pilots. Responding to a question in the Lok Sabha, Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol said IndiGo has a pilot-to-aircraft ratio of 7.6, meaning the airline deploys about eight pilots per aircraft on average. Airlines typically assign several pilots to each aircraft because planes operate multiple flights daily and pilots must observe mandatory rest periods under aviation safety regulations. Government data presented to Parliament shows that other Indian carriers maintain higher pilot-to-aircraft ratios than IndiGo: SpiceJet: 9.4 pilots per aircraft Akasa Air: 9.33 pilots per aircraft Air India: 9.1 pilots per aircraft Air India Express: 8.8 pilots per aircraft IndiGo: 7.6 pilots per aircraft The figures place IndiGo at the bottom among India’s major scheduled airlines in terms of pilot availability relative to fleet size. The government also disclosed the total number of pilots employed by major Indian carriers. IndiGo currently employs around 5,200 pilots, including 970 women pilots, the highest number among domestic airlines. Pilot employment across other airlines is as follows: Air India: 3,123 pilots, including 508 women Air India Express: 1,820 pilots, including 234 women Akasa Air: 761 pilots, including 76 women SpiceJet: 375 pilots, including 58 women The data also revealed that Air India Express employs the highest number of foreign (expatriate) pilots at 48, while IndiGo has hired 29 expatriate pilots. The parliamentary disclosure comes days after Pieter Elbers, Chief Executive Officer of IndiGo, resigned on March 10. The leadership change follows a major operational disruption in December 2025, when the airline experienced widespread flight cancellations and delays that affected around 300,000 passengers. Following the incident, India’s aviation regulator Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) imposed a ₹22.20-crore penalty on the airline for operational lapses. This triggered broader scrutiny of workforce planning and operational preparedness at the country’s largest airline as it continues to expand its fleet and network. India’s aviation sector has been expanding rapidly, with airlines adding aircraft and routes to meet rising passenger demand. The government’s data reflects how pilot availability relative to fleet size varies widely among airlines, a factor that can influence scheduling flexibility and operational resilience.

India

IndiGo Tops India In Pilot Numbers But Has Lowest Pilot-To-Aircraft Ratio At 7.6

March 13, 2026

3 Injured After Small Plane Emergency Landing In Union County; FAA & NTSB Probes SEO DES: Eyewitnesses saw the plane descend rapidly and crash in the center of a field, sustaining visible damage to its fuselage and landing gear SOCIAL: Three people were injured Tuesday evening when a single-engine plane made an emergency landing in a field near Union County, South Carolina, after experiencing a mechanical issue in flight. The aircraft attempted to divert to Union County Airport but landed in an open field instead, sustaining visible damage. All occupants, the pilot and two passengers were taken to a nearby hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Union County emergency responders were on site quickly, and both the FAA and NTSB have been notified and are investigating. South Carolina, United States: Three people were injured Tuesday evening when a small aircraft was forced to make an emergency landing in a field near Union County, South Carolina, local authorities confirmed. The incident, which occurred around 7:15 p.m. EDT in the 3100 block of Old Buncombe Road, prompted a rapid response from emergency services. According to the Union County Sheriff’s Office, the single-engine plane experienced a mechanical issue while in flight, forcing the pilot to attempt a diversion to Union County Airport. Unable to safely reach the runway, the aircraft was directed down into an open field near the airport. Eyewitnesses described seeing the plane descend rapidly before touching down roughly in the center of the field, sustaining visible damage to its fuselage and landing gear. “It looked like the pilot did everything possible to bring it down safely,” one local resident told reporters. All three occupants on board the pilot and two passengers were transported by Union County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to a nearby hospital. Authorities have confirmed that their injuries were non-life-threatening. Emergency personnel, including Union County Fire and Rescue and the county’s Emergency Management Department, were on the scene within minutes, providing care, securing the area, and coordinating with law enforcement. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been notified and will lead the investigation into the cause of the forced landing. While initial reports point to a mechanical issue, investigators will also review maintenance records, pilot reports, weather conditions, and other factors that may have contributed to the incident. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has also been requested to assist, as is standard procedure in civil aviation accidents involving injury or significant aircraft damage. At this time, authorities have not disclosed further details about the aircraft, including its make, model, tail number, or flight plan. Officials cautioned the public against speculating about the cause until investigators complete a preliminary assessment.

Incidents

3 Injured After Small Plane Emergency Landing In Union County; FAA & NTSB Probes

March 13, 2026

United States

US Govt Fires NTSB Member J. Todd Inman Over Misconduct Allegations; He Denies Claims

March 12, 2026

Airlines Hike Ticket Prices Worldwide As Middle East Crisis Drives Global Fuel Surge SEO DES: Jet fuel prices jumped from $85–$90 to nearly $150–$200 per barrel, sharply raising airline operating costs, where fuel typically accounts for about 25–40% SOCIAL: Escalating tensions in the Middle East have triggered a sharp surge in aviation fuel prices, forcing airlines worldwide to raise ticket prices and introduce fuel surcharges. Jet fuel costs have climbed from about $85–$90 per barrel to nearly $150–$200, significantly increasing operating expenses, which typically account for 25–40% of airline costs. Carriers including Qantas, Air New Zealand, Scandinavian Airlines, Air India, Air India Express and Hong Kong Airlines have already raised fares or added surcharges, while others such as Thai Airways, Cathay Pacific, Finnair and Vietnam Airlines are adjusting routes and reviewing costs. Disruptions near the Strait of Hormuz through which 20–25% of global oil supply passes have pushed energy prices higher and forced airlines to reroute flights around restricted Middle Eastern airspace, increasing fuel burn and operational expenses across the global aviation industry. Global: Major global carriers are increasing ticket prices and imposing fuel surcharges as escalating conflict in the Middle East drives a sharp surge in aviation fuel costs and disrupts major air routes. The crisis has triggered one of the most significant cost shocks for the aviation sector since the pandemic recovery, forcing carriers across Asia, Europe, and Oceania to revise fares and operational strategies. Jet fuel prices have risen dramatically from around $85–$90 per barrel to between $150 and $200 per barrel in recent days, nearly doubling the cost of one of the airline industry’s largest expenses. Fuel typically accounts for 25–40% of airline operating costs, leaving carriers with little choice but to pass part of the increase on to passengers. The spike follows escalating military tensions involving Iran, the United States and Israel, which have disrupted global energy markets and aviation routes, particularly around the Gulf region. Several international carriers have already announced fare increases or fuel surcharges as they attempt to offset rising operating costs. Qantas: Australia’s Qantas Airways has raised fares on international routes after jet fuel costs surged. The airline said ticket prices will increase by about 5% on some routes, with variations depending on distance and demand. Its low-cost subsidiary Jetstar has also adjusted fares in response to the fuel spike. Air New Zealand: Air New Zealand has increased ticket prices and announced plans to cut around 5% of its flights to roughly 1,100 services through early May 2026, affecting about 44,000 passengers, as rising fuel costs and longer flight routes strain operations. Scandinavian Airlines (SAS): Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) confirmed it has increased fares across several routes due to the rapid rise in jet fuel prices, while also reviewing its financial outlook amid cost pressures. Air India and Air India Express: India’s Air India and Air India Express have introduced a fuel surcharge of ₹399 per domestic ticket starting March 12, with additional adjustments expected on international routes. The airline said the move is necessary after aviation turbine fuel prices surged due to geopolitical tensions in the Gulf region. Hong Kong Airlines: Hong Kong Airlines has raised fuel surcharges by up to 35.2%, with the steepest increases applied to long-haul flights, reflecting the rapid escalation in jet fuel prices. Other Airlines Affected Other carriers responding to the crisis include: Thai Airways – reviewing fares and operating costs. Cathay Pacific – rerouting flights to Europe via alternative corridors. Finnair – adjusting routes and warning of cost pressures. Vietnam Airlines – facing potential fuel shortages if disruptions continue. The fare increases are closely linked to disruptions in global oil supply caused by the conflict around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical energy shipping routes. Roughly 20–25% of global oil supply normally passes through the strait, and attacks on shipping and energy infrastructure have sharply reduced tanker traffic and pushed global energy prices higher. Brent crude oil prices briefly surged above $100 per barrel, while aviation fuel benchmarks climbed sharply, driving airline operating costs upward worldwide. In addition to higher fuel prices, airlines are also dealing with operational disruptions caused by restricted airspace across parts of the Middle East. Several countries in the region temporarily closed their airspace following the escalation of hostilities, forcing airlines to reroute flights on longer paths between Asia, Europe and the Middle East. Longer routes increase fuel burn and operational costs, further pushing airlines toward fare increases. Airlines serving major hubs such as Dubai and Doha have also faced congestion and holding patterns due to the rerouting of flights away from conflict zones.

Global Aviation

Airlines Hike Ticket Prices Worldwide As Middle East Crisis Drives Global Fuel Surge

March 12, 2026

Two UAE Armed Forces Personnel Killed In Helicopter Crash Due To Technical Malfunction SEO DES: The helicopter crashed mid-flight due to a technical fault with no hostile action reported and details on the location or aircraft model yet to be released SOCIAL: On March 9, 2026, a UAE military helicopter crashed due to a technical malfunction, killing Captain Saeed Rashid Hamad Al Balushi and First Lieutenant Ali Saleh Ismail Al Tunaiji while on national duty. No hostile action was involved. The UAE Ministry of Defence described them as having “lost their lives while performing their national duty.” Full military funeral ceremonies were held on March 10 at Zayed Military Hospital, Abu Dhabi, attended by family, senior officials, and leaders. Separate funeral prayers took place in their home regions: Al Tunaiji in Ras Al Khaimah and Al Balushi in Al Ain. Senior Emirati leaders paid tribute and offered condolences to the families. Image: Ministry Of Defence (Representational Image) Video: Ministry Of Defence Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: Two members of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Armed Forces were killed on Monday, March 9, 2026, when a military helicopter crashed due to a technical malfunction while they were carrying out their national duties, the UAE Ministry of Defence has confirmed. According to the Ministry’s official statement, the helicopter went down mid‑flight after a technical fault caused it to crash. No hostile action has been reported in connection with the accident, and authorities have not released further details about the exact location of the incident or the specific aircraft model involved. The fallen crew were identified as Captain Pilot Saeed Rashid Hamad Al Balushi and first Lieutenant Pilot Ali Saleh Ismail Al Tunaiji. Both officers were serving in the UAE Armed Forces and were described by the Ministry as having “lost their lives while performing their national duty.” In a voice message shared publicly, First Lieutenant Al Tunaiji spoke about sacrifice and faith before his final mission, saying: “The great reward comes from the Lord of the worlds. If it is written that we are to be among the martyrs, then we shall be martyrs.” On Tuesday, March 10, 2026, the Ministry of Defence held full military funeral ceremonies for the two officers at Zayed Military Hospital in Abu Dhabi. The events were attended by family members, senior military officials, and leaders from across the UAE. Separate funeral prayers for the martyrs were also held in their respective home regions, a service for First Lieutenant Ali Saleh Ismail Al Tunaiji took place at Abdullah Ali Ibrahim Al Aamash Mosque in Ras Al Khaimah and a gathering for Captain Saeed Rashid Hamad Al Balushi was held at the Al Muatared Al Kabeer Mosque in Al Ain. Senior Emirati leaders, including military commanders and members of the ruling families, offered condolences to the grieving families and paid tribute to the officers’ dedication and service.

Helicopter Crash

Two UAE Armed Forces Personnel Killed In Helicopter Crash Due To Technical Malfunction

March 12, 2026

Air India Express Boeing 737 MAX Suffers Nose Gear Damage After Hard Landing In Phuket SEO DES: India’s aviation regulator said the aircraft made a suspected hard landing with a bounce on runway 9, damaging the nose landing gear during touchdown SOCIAL: An Air India Express Boeing 737 MAX 8 operating flight IX938 from Hyderabad, India to Phuket, Thailand suffered nose landing gear damage after a suspected hard landing at Phuket International Airport on March 11. The aircraft, carrying 133 passengers, stopped on the runway, forcing a temporary suspension of airport operations. All passengers and crew were safely evacuated with no injuries reported. Airport teams later towed the aircraft for technical inspections and runway clearance. Authorities have launched an investigation to determine the cause of the hard landing and landing gear damage. Image: upuknews (X) Video: Saturnworldnews (X) | India Today Phuket, Thailand: An Air India Express flight operating from Hyderabad to Phuket suffered damage to its nose landing gear after a hard landing at Phuket International Airport in Thailand on Wednesday, forcing airport authorities to temporarily suspend runway operations while emergency teams cleared the aircraft. The aircraft involved in the incident carried 133 passengers, all of whom were reported safe after the evacuation The aircraft involved was a Boeing 737 MAX 8 operating flight IX938 from Hyderabad. According to officials, the aircraft experienced a nose-wheel issue during landing, leaving the plane immobilised on the runway and prompting the airport to halt flight movements as a safety precaution. Flight-tracking data indicated that the aircraft departed Rajiv Gandhi International Airport in Hyderabad at 6:42 a.m., slightly later than its scheduled departure of 6:20 a.m., and landed at Phuket at about 11:40 a.m. local time. Shortly after touchdown, the nose landing gear was found to be damaged following what authorities described as a suspected hard landing. Officials from India’s aviation regulator said the aircraft “made a suspected hard landing with a bounce on runway 9,” which led to damage to the forward landing gear. In aviation terms, a hard landing occurs when an aircraft touches down with excessive vertical speed or force. Photographs and videos from the airport showed the damaged nose-wheel section of the aircraft on the runway after landing. Emergency response teams and airport personnel rushed to secure the aircraft and assess the situation. Passengers and crew on board the aircraft were safely evacuated and taken to the terminal building, with no injuries reported, according to airline and airport authorities. The disabled aircraft remained on the runway for several hours while airport teams worked to tow it away and conduct safety inspections. The temporary runway closure caused disruptions to scheduled flight operations at Phuket, one of Thailand’s busiest international tourism gateways. In a statement, Air India Express confirmed the incident, saying the Hyderabad–Phuket flight experienced an issue with the nose wheel after landing and that the crew followed all standard safety procedures. “We confirm that our Hyderabad-Phuket flight on March 11 experienced an issue with the nose wheel at Phuket Airport. The crew followed all standard protocols, and guests were safely deplaned,” the airline said. Authorities are expected to investigate the circumstances surrounding the landing and the damage to the aircraft’s landing gear, in coordination with relevant aviation regulators. https://x.com/i/status/2031674853678620901

Incidents

Air India Express Boeing 737 MAX Suffers Nose Gear Damage After Hard Landing In Phuket

March 11, 2026

« Previous Next »

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Email

Recent News

Atlanta, United States: The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is investigating a serious runway separation incident involving two Delta Air Lines aircraft at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport after the jets came into close proximity during simultaneous arrival and departure operations late on July 27. The incident involved Delta Air Lines Flight DL1568, arriving from Pittsburgh, and Delta Air Lines Flight DL2472, departing for Rochester, New York. According to the FAA and flight-tracking data, Flight 1568 was on final approach when the crew initiated a go-around after the departing aircraft had not cleared the runway environment in time. As the arriving aircraft climbed away from the runway, it came into conflict with the departing Delta jet. Both flight crews received Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) resolution advisories, prompting immediate evasive action. Air traffic controllers instructed the departing aircraft to turn and continue climbing while the arriving aircraft followed its missed-approach procedure. The crews complied with the alerts and ATC instructions, allowing both aircraft to safely regain separation. According to publicly reported flight data, the aircraft came within approximately 1,800 feet horizontally and 600 feet vertically at their closest point before increasing separation. No injuries were reported, and both flights continued safely after the event. Flight 1568 subsequently entered a holding pattern before landing safely in Atlanta, while Flight 2472 continued its scheduled flight to Rochester. Air traffic control audio reviewed by multiple media outlets captured the urgency of the event. Controllers quickly issued revised instructions after recognizing the developing conflict, while one pilot was heard expressing surprise at how close the aircraft had come. The communications indicate that both the controllers and flight crews acted promptly in response to the TCAS warnings, helping prevent a more serious incident. The FAA confirmed it is investigating the occurrence to determine the sequence of events, including runway occupancy, aircraft spacing and air traffic control actions. As of the latest update, the agency has not released preliminary findings or identified a probable cause. No damage to either aircraft has been reported, and no onboard injuries have been disclosed. The airline's operating crews followed established safety procedures, including compliance with TCAS resolution advisories and ATC instructions, allowing both flights to continue safely.

FAA Investigates Close Call Between Two Delta Air Lines Aircraft At Atlanta Airport

July 30, 2026

around 180 passengers came dangerously close to a serious accident while approaching London Heathrow Airport earlier this month, after a reported air data system failure led to a loss of airspeed information during the aircraft's final descent. The incident, which occurred on July 6 aboard Flight BA919 from Düsseldorf, Germany, is now under investigation by the UK's Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB). The aircraft was descending over east London at approximately 4,000 feet near Canary Wharf when one of its air data systems reportedly malfunctioned. Air data systems provide pilots with critical flight information including airspeed, altitude and other performance parameters essential for safely controlling the aircraft, particularly during the approach and landing phases. According to reports first published by The Sun, the loss of air data reportedly resulted in the Airbus A320 entering an aerodynamic stall, a condition in which the wings no longer generate sufficient lift because the aircraft's angle of attack becomes excessive. Unlike an engine failure, a stall does not mean the engines stop operating; instead, the aircraft risks losing altitude rapidly unless immediate corrective action is taken. Reports said the first officer initially attempted to recover the aircraft before the captain intervened directly in the cockpit to regain control. A source described the recovery as particularly challenging because it occurred at low altitude during the final approach, stating that such physical intervention by a captain is highly unusual. Several reports described the event as one of the most serious aviation near misses in the United Kingdom in recent years. According to reports, the occurrence has been recorded as a "loss of control in-flight" and described as "pilot induced." However, the AAIB has not released any preliminary findings, and the cause of the incident, including the sequence of events leading to the reported loss of control, remains under investigation. It is therefore too early to determine whether crew actions, equipment failure, or a combination of factors contributed to the event. In a statement, British Airways confirmed that it is cooperating with the AAIB's investigation into the serious incident. The UK's Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), in line with its standard practice, has declined to comment while the investigation remains ongoing. The AAIB's investigation into Flight BA919 is expected to examine aircraft systems, recorded flight data, cockpit voice recordings, maintenance history, crew actions and operational procedures before determining the cause of the incident and issuing any safety recommendations.

British Airways A320 Investigated Following Reported Loss Of Airspeed Near Heathrow

July 30, 2026

crashed while attempting to land at the Dan Creek airstrip near McCarthy, Alaska, with federal investigators probing the fatal accident. According to the Alaska State Troopers, the crash was reported at approximately 9:30 p.m. on July 27, 2026, after a personal aircraft went down at the Dan Creek airstrip, located roughly 15 to 20 miles east of the remote community of McCarthy in the Wrangell-St. Elias Mountains. Responders reached the site aboard a state aircraft early the following morning and discovered the wreckage shortly after 6 a.m. on July 28, confirming that all three occupants had died. An initial report from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) identified the aircraft as a Piper PA-22-150, a four-seat, single-engine airplane operating as a personal flight. According to the FAA, the aircraft banked left while landing, impacted terrain and caught fire, resulting in a post-crash fire that destroyed the aircraft and killed the pilot and two passengers. The remains of the three occupants were recovered from the wreckage and transported to the Alaska State Medical Examiner's Office for autopsy and formal identification, Alaska State Troopers said. Family members have identified local pilot Jason Lobo and 23-year-old Anadyr Elliott as two of the three people killed in the accident. The identity of the third occupant had not been officially confirmed at the time of reporting. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has opened an investigation into the accident after being notified by Alaska State Troopers. The agency is expected to determine the circumstances and probable cause of the crash. The accident remains under investigation, and authorities have not released any additional information regarding factors that may have contributed to the crash.

Three Killed After Piper PA-22 Crashes During Landing Attempt At Alaska Airstrip

July 30, 2026

San Juan Province, Argentina: All seven people aboard a Bell 412 helicopter were killed after the aircraft crashed in Argentina's San Juan Province on July 29 while en route to support wildfire suppression operations in the neighboring province of La Rioja, authorities confirmed. The helicopter, operated under contract to Argentina's Federal Emergency Agency (AFE), went down during the morning near Ischigualasto Provincial Park, around 1,100 kilometers northwest of Buenos Aires. Officials said the aircraft had been conducting training activities in San Juan before departing to assist firefighters battling a forest fire in La Rioja. According to the AFE, the helicopter's last recorded communication was received at 10:26 a.m. local time. After contact was lost, another aircraft operating in the area located the crash site and alerted authorities, triggering the emergency response. There were seven people on board, and all were killed. No survivors were reported, and authorities did not report any injuries on the ground. Those killed included Carlos Heredia, Director of Civil Protection in San Juan; Germán Videla, Deputy Chief of the San Juan Provincial Police; Rubén Castro and Jorge Carbajal, both senior officers with the provincial Fire Department; pilot Matías Valenzuela; and AFE firefighters Andrés Bosch and Rodrigo Aimetta, who were deployed from other jurisdictions. San Juan Governor Marcelo Orrego confirmed the fatalities in a statement posted on social media, "It is with deep sorrow that we received the news of the helicopter accident that occurred in our province, in which seven people sadly lost their lives." The governor also extended condolences to the victims' families."I want to express my deepest condolences to the families of all the victims at this time of immense grief. We stand with each and every one of their loved ones." In an official statement, the Federal Emergency Agency said the Bell 412 had been assigned to support emergency operations after completing training activities in San Juan. "The causes of the accident are under investigation." AFE added that it remains in contact with the relevant authorities and will release additional official information as it becomes available. Following the tragedy, Governor Orrego declared three days of official mourning across San Juan Province. State celebrations were suspended, and flags at government buildings were ordered to be flown at half-mast in memory of the victims. The cause of the crash has not yet been determined, and the investigation is ongoing

Seven Killed After Bell 412 Helicopter Crashes En Route To Argentina Wildfire Mission

July 30, 2026

New Delhi, India: The investigation into the crash of Air India flight AI-171 has entered its final stages, with the government telling Parliament that an advanced examination of the aircraft’s fuel control switch and its locking mechanism found no abnormality. However, the inspection of the complete thrust control module remains underway at the original equipment manufacturer's facility in Seattle. Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol provided the update during the Monsoon Session of Parliament on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, in response to questions in the Rajya Sabha. According to the Ministry of Civil Aviation's response, the tests were ordered by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) as part of continuing airworthiness checks after the Boeing 787 aircraft type was grounded in February this year. "A detailed examination of the fuel control switch, including the structural integrity of its locking detents, found no abnormality," Mohol said. The government further stated: "Inspection of the complete Thrust Control Module at the OEM's facility is underway." The finding is significant because the movement of the two engine fuel control switches has been a central focus of the investigation into the June 12, 2025 crash, which happened shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad. The aircraft came down in the Meghani Nagar area, killing 260 people, including 241 of the 242 people aboard the aircraft and 19 people on the ground. One passenger survived the crash. The preliminary investigation found that both switches moved from the RUN position to CUT OFF shortly after takeoff, resulting in the loss of thrust from both engines. The preliminary report, however, did not establish why the switches moved or assign responsibility for the movement. The latest examination has so far found no abnormality in the locking mechanism of the fuel control switch. However, the government has not said that the investigation has established the cause of the switches moving to the CUTOFF position. The complete thrust control module is still being examined, and the outcome of that inspection remains awaited. The government also rejected suggestions that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has delayed the final report into the crash. Mohol said investigations into major air accidents do not follow a fixed timeline and that the AI-171 inquiry is progressing in accordance with established investigation procedures. "All probable causes and contributing factors leading to the accident are being investigated," the minister said. The Ministry of Civil Aviation said the final investigation report will contain the findings of the probe and will be made public and uploaded on the AAIB's website once the investigation is completed. The preliminary report also noted that the aircraft had been certified as airworthy before the flight and that its maintenance records did not show a reported defect involving the fuel control switches. It also recorded that the aircraft's throttle control module had previously been replaced, although the replacements were unrelated to reported fuel-switch defects. The investigation subsequently drew international attention because the fuel control switches are part of the Boeing 787's thrust control system and are designed with locking mechanisms intended to prevent unintended movement. The latest government statement indicates that the structural integrity of the locking detents has now been examined and that no abnormality was identified in that specific component. However, the government has not yet released a final conclusion on what caused the switches to move during the AI-171 flight. The continuing inspection of the complete thrust control module is therefore an important remaining part of the technical examination. The AAIB's final report is expected to establish the complete sequence of events, identify the causes and contributing factors, and determine whether any safety recommendations are required. Until the final report is released, the precise cause of the fuel control switches moving to CUTOFF remains unresolved in the publicly available investigation findings. The latest government update therefore clears one specific area of concern: the fuel control switch locking mechanism but does not, by itself, close the wider question of why both switches moved to the CUTOFF position shortly after takeoff. The investigation remains ongoing, with the complete thrust control module examination and the AAIB's final assessment is still pending.

Govt Says Air India AI171 Crash Probe Finds No Fault In Fuel Switch Locking Mechanism

July 29, 2026

Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - PART 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Citywide Networks Must Be Designed Around Real Travel Patterns

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 3

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Part 2- Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 2

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube