Denver, United States: United Airlines is facing a major federal lawsuit filed by a former flight attendant who accuses the carrier of failing to protect her from years of harassment and exploitation after one of its pilots allegedly distributed her private, intimate images online.
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado on October 28, alleges that United neglected to act despite being alerted that a company pilot had engaged in criminal behavior involving the non-consensual sharing of explicit photos and videos of his ex-girlfriend, a United flight attendant.
According to court filings, the plaintiff identified as Lisa Denson began working for United in 2015 and met Andrew Hill, a first officer at the airline, the following year. The lawsuit claims Hill coerced her into sending explicit photos and videos during their relationship and secretly recorded her on multiple occasions, including in uniform and during layovers. After their breakup, Hill allegedly uploaded those images to pornographic websites and shared them across social media platforms without her consent.
Hill later pleaded guilty in 2024 to multiple felony counts, including distribution of intimate images, stalking, and online impersonation. Despite an active police investigation and a search warrant served to United in April 2024, the airline did not suspend or terminate Hill until his arrest three months later, the complaint alleges.
“The company’s inaction enabled continued harm to Ms. Denson, despite clear evidence of ongoing criminal conduct by a uniformed employee,” the lawsuit states.
Denson’s attorneys argue that United failed to implement or enforce adequate safeguards and training programs to prevent sexual harassment and digital misconduct among its workforce. The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as a court order requiring the airline to overhaul its harassment prevention policies.
United Airlines has not yet filed a formal response to the new complaint. The lawsuit, filed under case number 1:25-cv-03403, could have far-reaching implications for airline liability in cases involving off-duty misconduct by flight crew members.
