Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

Search

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

News
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Civil Aviation
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

Aviation Today News Desk

NTSB Cites Runway Safety System Failed To Alert Before Deadly LaGuardia Collision SEO DES: The NTSB said the system missed the fire truck, which lacked a transponder, amid complex runway traffic with two controllers on duty during the incident SOCIAL: A critical runway safety alert system at LaGuardia Airport failed to warn air traffic controllers before an Air Canada Express Flight 8646 collided with a Port Authority fire-rescue vehicle on March 22, killing both pilots and injuring at least 41 others. The NTSB reported the system did not detect the fire truck because it lacked a transponder, preventing a warning. The crash occurred amid complex runway traffic, and two controllers were on duty at the time, consistent with standard procedures. Investigators are reviewing air traffic control workload, emergency procedures, and cockpit communications to determine contributing factors, emphasizing that multiple causes are under examination. New York, United States: A critical runway safety alert system at LaGuardia Airport (LGA) failed to issue a warning before an Air Canada Express jet struck a Port Authority fire‑rescue vehicle on the runway late Sunday night, federal investigators confirmed Tuesday. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said the absence of an alert is a central focus of its ongoing probe into the crash that killed both pilots and injured dozens of passengers and crew. The March 22 collision involved Air Canada Express Flight 8646, a Bombardier CRJ‑900 arriving from Montréal with 76 people aboard. The aircraft was landing when it collided at high speed with an airport rescue‑and‑firefighting vehicle responding to another incident at the busy New York City airport. Two pilots were killed and at least 41 people were hurt in the impact. In a press briefing, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said the runway surveillance system at LGA designed to track ground movements of aircraft and vehicles“did not alert” air traffic controllers before the collision. Homendy explained that the failure stemmed from the fire truck’s lack of a transponder, a device that broadcasts its position to radar and ground detection systems. Without that signal, the alert system was unable to generate a confident track of the vehicle’s movements and therefore did not issue a warning of the imminent danger. NTSB officials noted that the crash occurred amid complex surface movements near the runway, with vehicles merging and un‑merging, which further complicated the system’s ability to create a reliable track. Even though the physical safety system was functioning, its inability to detect the non‑transponder‑equipped truck prevented an alert that might have given controllers and flight crews crucial extra seconds to respond. Homendy also confirmed there were two controllers in the LGA air traffic control tower at the time of the accident the local controller and the controller in charge which she said is consistent with standard operating procedures for the airport’s midnight shift. The NTSB is reviewing whether controller workload, shift changes, and the emergency duties being handled at the time played any role in the decision to authorize the fire truck’s runway crossing just seconds before the jet touched down. Officials are examining cockpit voice recordings and communications to better understand how the sequence unfolded. Homendy stressed that NTSB rarely finds a single cause in accidents of this scale, saying investigators are examining “many, many things” and that any conclusions are preliminary.

NTSB Cites Runway Safety System Failed To Alert Before Deadly LaGuardia Collision

March 26, 2026

Ryanair Flight Aborts Route After Mid-Air Emergency, Returns To Manchester SEO DES: The crew declared an emergency and made a U-turn over the North Sea, with the cause unconfirmed; No injuries were reported among passengers or crew SOCIAL: A Ryanair Boeing 737-800 flight from Manchester to Sandefjord declared a mid-air emergency and returned after a precautionary turnaround over the North Sea on March 24, 2026. The crew issued a 7700 emergency squawk while at cruising altitude, prompting priority handling before safely landing back in Manchester. No injuries were reported, and the exact cause remains unconfirmed, though the return is believed to be precautionary. Manchester, United Kingdom: A Ryanair flight departing Manchester for Sandefjord, Norway, declared a mid-air emergency and returned to its origin airport after executing a precautionary turnaround over the North Sea on March 24, 2026. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800 operated by Ryanair, had reached cruising altitude when the crew issued a general emergency squawk (7700), prompting immediate attention from air traffic control and emergency response protocols. According to multiple reports, the flight had progressed only partway along its route when the pilots identified an issue requiring urgent action. The crew then declared an emergency and initiated a controlled U-turn while flying over the North Sea. A 7700 squawk, universally recognised in aviation as a signal of general emergency, ensured the aircraft received priority handling from air traffic controllers and cleared airspace for a direct return. The aircraft safely landed back at Manchester Airport, where emergency services were placed on standby as a precaution. No injuries were reported among passengers or crew. Authorities and the airline have not confirmed the exact cause of the emergency. However, such declarations are often linked to technical warnings, onboard medical situations, or precautionary system alerts. Ryanair has not released a detailed statement specifying the nature of the issue. Early indications suggest the decision to return was precautionary, consistent with standard aviation safety protocols prioritising risk mitigation.

Ryanair Flight Aborts Route After Mid-Air Emergency, Returns To Manchester

March 25, 2026

Drone Strike Triggers Fire At Kuwait International Airport Amid Escalating Gulf Crisis SEO DES: Kuwait has reported multiple recent attacks, including strikes on radar systems & fuel tanks, reflecting rising threats to critical aviation infrastructure SOCIAL: A drone strike hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport in Kuwait City, Kuwait, triggering a fire that was quickly contained with no casualties and limited damage. The incident is part of a series of recent drone and missile attacks linked to escalating Iran-U.S.-Israel tensions, with authorities continuing investigations as regional security risks intensify. Kuwait has reported multiple similar attacks in recent weeks, including strikes on radar systems and fuel facilities, reflecting growing threats to critical aviation infrastructure. The situation reflects a broader regional escalation, with Gulf nations facing increased aerial threats and rising concerns over aviation safety and fuel supply stability. Kuwait City, Kuwait: A drone strike targeting fuel storage infrastructure at Kuwait International Airport triggered a fire on Wednesday, marking the latest escalation in a widening regional conflict linked to the ongoing Iran-U.S.-Israel tensions. According to Kuwait’s Civil Aviation Authority, the attack struck a fuel tank at the airport, causing a blaze that was swiftly contained by emergency response teams. Authorities confirmed that no casualties or injuries were reported, and initial assessments indicated that the damage was limited to infrastructure. Emergency protocols were immediately activated, with firefighting units responding to the scene and bringing the situation under control within a short period. Officials have not yet disclosed the origin of the drone or the group responsible, and investigations remain ongoing. Agency spokesman Abdullah Al-Rajhi said the impact was “limited,” confirming that firefighters were continuing operations to fully extinguish the blaze. Preliminary assessments indicated that the attack caused only material damage. The incident is not isolated. Kuwait has faced repeated drone and missile attacks in recent weeks, as regional tensions intensified following coordinated military actions involving Iran, the United States, and Israel. Wednesday’s strike is the latest in a string of attacks targeting Kuwait’s main airport since the conflict intensified on February 28. Earlier incidents include a March 14 drone strike on radar systems and a March 8 attack that damaged fuel storage facilities. A separate strike on a passenger terminal had left several people with minor injuries. Kuwait’s military has repeatedly reported “waves of hostile drones” entering its airspace, with air defense systems actively intercepting incoming threats. The attack comes amid a broader escalation in the Middle East, where Iran has launched drone and missile strikes targeting the U.S.-linked assets and allied countries across the Gulf, including Kuwait, Bahrain, and Jordan. Kuwait, which hosts U.S. military installations, has increasingly found itself exposed to retaliatory strikes as the conflict expands beyond its initial theaters. In recent weeks, the country has also reported casualties among security personnel and damage to infrastructure linked to ongoing aerial attacks, reflecting the persistent threat environment. Globally, the conflict has begun to impact aviation operations and fuel supply chains, with rising jet fuel prices and early signs of disruptions to flight networks in parts of Asia and beyond. Kuwaiti authorities continue to assess the full extent of the damage and are working to determine the source and intent behind the attack. No group has officially claimed responsibility so far.

Drone Strike Triggers Fire At Kuwait International Airport Amid Escalating Gulf Crisis

March 25, 2026

Instructor & Student Killed In Florida Helicopter Crash After Mid-Air Engine Trouble SEO DES: Robinson R44 from Palm Beach Helicopters was on a training flight; ATC audio revealed that the pilot attempted emergency landing moments before losing contact SOCIAL: A training flight in Boynton Beach, United States ended in tragedy after a helicopter suffered engine trouble mid-air and crashed into a warehouse, killing a 28-year-old instructor and a 52-year-old student. Air traffic control audio revealed the pilot attempted an emergency landing moments before losing contact. The aircraft, a Robinson R44 operated by Palm Beach Helicopters, went down around 12:30 p.m. Authorities, including the National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administration, are investigating, with early indications pointing to a possible engine malfunction. Boynton Beach, United States: A fatal helicopter crash in Boynton Beach, Florida, has claimed the lives of a flight instructor and a student pilot after the aircraft experienced engine trouble mid-flight, according to authorities and newly obtained air traffic control recordings. Investigators confirmed that the victims were 28-year-old instructor Alejandro Carrasco of West Palm Beach and 52-year-old student Bryan Menna of Michigan, who were on board a training flight at the time of the accident. According to air traffic control audio reviewed by investigators, the pilot reported a developing issue shortly before the crash. In the transmission, the pilot indicated that the helicopter was experiencing a problem and that an emergency landing in a nearby field was being attempted. "We're going to land here, in one of these fields; we have a problem with the helicopter," a person on board said in the 43-second radio call obtained this Tuesday. Apparently, someone who was listening didn't hear what was said, and another person can be heard explaining the situation. "He said he's going to land in one of the fields; there's a problem with the engine," the other person says. The communication lasted less than a minute before contact was lost. The helicopter subsequently crashed into the roof of a warehouse near South Congress Avenue at approximately 12:30 p.m., as confirmed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Aerial footage from the scene showed parts of the helicopter lodged in the building’s structure, showcasing the force of the impact. Witnesses reported seeing fluid leaking from the wreckage, though no post-crash explosion occurred. Emergency responders quickly secured the area, and access to nearby facilities remained restricted as authorities began their investigation. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has taken the lead in determining the cause of the crash, with assistance from the FAA. Early indications point toward a possible engine malfunction, though officials have not yet confirmed a definitive cause. The aircraft involved was identified as a Robinson R44 helicopter, a commonly used model for training flights. FAA records showed that the helicopter belongs to Palm Beach Helicopters, a flight school in Lantana. Authorities said investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board are expected to provide more details about the cause in coming weeks.

Instructor & Student Killed In Florida Helicopter Crash After Mid-Air Engine Trouble

March 25, 2026

Air India Flight Makes Precautionary Diversion To Jeddah After Technical Issue SEO DES: The Issue detected after 6+ hours in cruise prompted diversion; Air India said it was a precaution, with the aircraft undergoing detailed technical checks SOCIAL: An Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner operating flight AI133 from Bengaluru to London diverted to Jeddah on March 23 after a suspected technical issue developed en route. The issue was detected after over six hours of flight during the cruise phase, prompting a precautionary diversion. Air India said the move was taken out of an abundance of caution, with the aircraft now undergoing detailed technical checks. Image: Aeroprints (Flickr) Video: Air India Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: An Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner operating flight AI133 from Bengaluru to London Heathrow was forced to make a precautionary diversion to Jeddah on March 23 after a suspected technical issue arose mid-flight, the airline confirmed. The aircraft, registered VT-ANI, had been airborne for over six hours when the flight crew identified a potential technical concern and opted to divert in line with standard safety procedures. According to airline and flight tracking data, the long-haul flight departed from Bengaluru and was well into its cruise phase before the issue was detected. The crew initiated a precautionary en-route diversion to King Abdulaziz International Airport in Jeddah. The aircraft landed safely at approximately 19:58 IST, with no injuries reported among passengers or crew. While the exact nature of the technical fault has not been disclosed, sources indicated that the decision to divert was taken as a preventive safety measure rather than an emergency response. In an official statement, Air India said, “Flight AI133,made a precautionary en route diversion to Jeddah following a suspected technical issue. The aircraft landed safely and all passengers and crew are confirmed safe.” The airline emphasized that the diversion was carried out “out of an abundance of caution” and in strict adherence to safety protocols. It further added, “The aircraft is currently undergoing comprehensive technical inspections in accordance with established safety protocols.” Passengers were provided assistance, including onward travel support and necessary arrangements.

Air India Flight Makes Precautionary Diversion To Jeddah After Technical Issue

March 25, 2026

American Eagle Flight Returns To Raleigh-Durham Airport After Smoke Alert Mid-Air SEO DES: Passengers evacuated with no injuries, American Airlines cited a “reported odor”; aircraft grounded for inspection, cause still under investigation SOCIAL: An American Eagle CRJ-900 flight returned to Raleigh-Durham International Airport shortly after takeoff due to reported smoke and a burning odor in the cabin. The aircraft landed safely within 23 minutes, with emergency services on standby. Passengers were evacuated and no injuries were reported. American Airlines said the diversion was due to a “reported odor,” and the aircraft was taken out of service for inspection, with the exact cause yet to be determined. Image: Quintin Soloviev (Wikimedia) Video: American Airlines Morrisville, United States: An American Eagle regional flight was forced to return to Raleigh-Durham International Airport shortly after takeoff on Monday night after pilots reported smoke and a burning odor inside the aircraft cabin, prompting an emergency response. American Eagle Flight 5201, operated by a Bombardier CRJ-900, departed Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) at approximately 8:13 p.m. en route to Philadelphia. Within minutes of departure, the flight crew detected what was described as smoke accompanied by a burning smell inside the cabin, triggering standard emergency procedures. Following the detection, pilots elected to discontinue the climb and remain in the vicinity of the airport while preparing for a safe return. Flight tracking and local reports indicate the aircraft maneuvered over northern Wake County, executing turns over Falls Lake and later looping near Jordan Lake to align for landing. The aircraft landed safely at RDU approximately 23 minutes after departure under emergency conditions. Emergency services, including fire crews and EMS units, were positioned on standby as the aircraft touched down. Visuals from the airport showed the aircraft surrounded by emergency vehicles shortly after landing. Passengers were evacuated onto the tarmac and transported to the terminal by buses. No injuries were reported among passengers or crew. American Airlines confirmed that the flight returned to RDU due to a “reported odor” onboard, a term commonly used in aviation when the exact source of smoke or fumes has not yet been identified. The aircraft was subsequently taken out of service for a detailed inspection by maintenance teams. “All passengers made it safely to the terminal, and we are working to assist them with their travel plans,” the airline said, apologizing for the disruption and commending the crew’s handling of the situation. As of now, no confirmed cause of the smoke or odor has been officially released.

American Eagle Flight Returns To Raleigh-Durham Airport After Smoke Alert Mid-Air

March 24, 2026

Aeroflot Moscow To Baku Flight Turns Back After Bird Strike, Lands Safely In Moscow SEO DES: Crew followed safety protocols, landed safely with emergency teams on standby; no injuries. Passengers were assisted, while the aircraft was inspected SOCIAL: An Aeroflot flight (SU1854) from Moscow to Baku returned shortly after takeoff from Sheremetyevo International Airport due to a confirmed bird strike. Initial reports suggested a technical issue, but the airline clarified the cause. The crew followed safety protocols, landed safely with emergency services on standby, and no injuries were reported. Passengers were assisted and later rebooked, while the aircraft underwent inspection. The incident shows standard aviation precautionary procedures during takeoff-related events. Authorities and airline teams continue routine checks to ensure full airworthiness before returning the aircraft to service. Moscow, Russia: An Aeroflot passenger flight bound for Baku was forced to return shortly after takeoff from Sheremetyevo International Airport on March 22, 2026 following a bird strike, prompting a precautionary landing in Moscow. The flight, SU1854, had departed as scheduled but discontinued its climb within minutes, turning back toward the airport in line with standard safety procedures. Early reports from regional media suggested a possible engine malfunction or technical fault, creating initial uncertainty around the cause of the diversion. However, subsequent clarification from the airline and supporting aviation incident data confirmed that the aircraft had encountered birds shortly after departure. The crew, following established safety protocols for such events, elected to return to the departure airport for inspection despite no immediate indication of engine failure. According to available flight data, the aircraft had climbed to a relatively low altitude before reversing course. Bird strikes during this phase of flight are treated with heightened caution due to the potential risk of engine ingestion or hidden structural damage, even when systems appear to be functioning normally. Aviation safety guidance requires crews to prioritize landing at the nearest suitable airport to allow for thorough technical checks. The aircraft landed safely at Sheremetyevo with emergency services on standby as a precaution. The landing was reported to be uneventful, and the aircraft was able to taxi to the stand without assistance. No injuries were reported among passengers or crew. Following the incident, passengers were disembarked and provided assistance by the airline, with arrangements made for an alternative aircraft to continue the journey to Baku. Maintenance teams initiated detailed inspections to assess the extent of any damage resulting from the bird strike.

Aeroflot Moscow To Baku Flight Turns Back After Bird Strike, Lands Safely In Moscow

March 24, 2026

Govt Removes Fare Caps As Airlines Oppose 60% Seats Free Of Selection Charges SEO DES: Authorities want fair fares, but airlines warn lost add-on revenue may push base prices up, raising concerns over pricing freedom and financial strain SOCIAL: The government’s move to mandate 60% free seat selection and scrap fare caps has drawn strong opposition from airlines, which warn it could lead to higher ticket prices. While authorities have asked carriers to keep fares reasonable and transparent, airlines argue the loss of ancillary revenue may force them to raise base fares, raising concerns over pricing freedom, financial strain, and market impact. The earlier fare caps, which set limits based on distance, have now been withdrawn from March 23, 2026, restoring pricing flexibility to airlines. However, the move signals a shift toward self-regulation, with the government expecting airlines to balance affordability with market-driven pricing. New Delhi, India: A policy push by the government to strengthen passenger rights and enforce fare transparency has triggered sharp resistance from India’s leading airlines, setting the stage for a broader debate over pricing freedom and regulatory oversight in the aviation sector. The Ministry of Civil Aviation, through the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), has directed carriers to ensure that at least 60% of seats on every flight are available for free selection, a move aimed at reducing ancillary charges and allowing passengers, particularly families booked under a single PNR, to be seated together without paying extra. The directive comes alongside a broader advisory asking airlines to maintain fares that are “reasonable, transparent and commensurate with market conditions,” even as the government transitions away from direct fare controls. Major carriers including Air India, IndiGo and SpiceJet have opposed the 60% free seat selection mandate, arguing that it interferes with their commercial pricing models and could have unintended financial consequences. Represented by the Federation of Indian Airlines (FIA), these carriers have formally approached the government, stating that seat selection fees form a critical component of ancillary revenues in an industry already operating on thin margins. Airlines contend that such non-ticket income helps offset high operating costs, including fuel, maintenance, and airport charges, and that restricting it would disrupt their financial balance. The government’s latest stance also marks a significant shift in its fare regulation approach. In its December 6 order, the ministry had imposed fare caps on economy class tickets, limiting prices to ₹7,500 for routes up to 500 km, ₹12,000 for distances between 500 and 1,000 km, ₹15,000 for sectors ranging from 1,000 to 1,500 km, and ₹18,000 for routes beyond 1,500 km, excluding taxes and additional fees. However, with operations now stabilised, the ministry has announced that these caps “shall stand withdrawn with effect from March 23, 2026,” effectively restoring pricing flexibility to airlines while simultaneously cautioning them against excessive or opaque fare structures. Airlines have warned that the combination of removing ancillary revenue streams through mandatory free seat allocation and expecting fare restraint could create financial strain. Industry executives argue that instead of lowering travel costs, the policy may inadvertently push up base fares as carriers attempt to recover lost income. This, they say, could neutralise the intended benefit for passengers and lead to a redistribution of costs rather than an actual reduction in overall ticket prices. The industry has also raised concerns about regulatory overreach, maintaining that fare determination in a competitive market should remain dynamic and driven by demand-supply factors. The market response has reflected these concerns, with airline stocks reacting negatively following the announcement, highlighting investor apprehension over potential revenue impacts. The ancillary revenues, including seat selection, baggage fees, and onboard services, have become an increasingly important part of airline business models globally, and any disruption to this stream could have wider financial implications. For passengers, the new framework promises immediate relief in terms of fewer add-on charges and improved seating convenience, particularly for families and groups. At the same time, the removal of fare caps theoretically allows for more competitive pricing, but also raises the risk of price volatility if not closely monitored. The government’s approach indicates a shift toward a hybrid model, where airlines are given pricing freedom but are expected to exercise self-regulation under regulatory scrutiny.

Govt Removes Fare Caps As Airlines Oppose 60% Seats Free Of Selection Charges

March 24, 2026

Colombian Air Force C-130 Crash Kills 66 After Takeoff In Amazon Region, Dozens Injured SEO DES: Aircraft with 125 onboard, including 114 troops and 11 crew, reportedly lost altitude after takeoff and crashed, catching fire a few km from the runway SOCIAL: A Colombian Air Force C-130 Hercules crashed shortly after takeoff from Caucayá Airport in Puerto Leguízamo, Putumayo, on March 23, 2026, while en route to Puerto Asís on a military transport mission. The aircraft was carrying 125 people, including 114 troops and 11 crew members, and reportedly lost altitude during climb-out before crashing and catching fire a few kilometers from the runway. At least 66 people were killed and dozens injured, while rescue operations continue in difficult Amazon terrain with survivors being airlifted to nearby hospitals. Authorities said the cause is still under investigation, with no evidence of hostile action. President Gustavo Petro called it a “horrific accident” and expressed condolences to the victims’ families. Puerto Leguízamo, Colombia: A Colombian Air Force Lockheed Martin C-130 Hercules transport aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff in the remote Putumayo region on March 23, 2026, killing at least 66 people and injuring dozens more, according to military and government officials. Rescue operations are still underway as authorities continue searching for survivors in difficult Amazon terrain. The aircraft departed from Caucayá Airport in Puerto Leguízamo, a remote town in southern Colombia near the borders with Peru and Ecuador, and was headed to Puerto Asís on a routine military transport mission. According to preliminary reports, the aircraft lost altitude during its initial climb phase shortly after takeoff and went down a few kilometers from the runway before bursting into flames. Authorities confirmed that there were 125 people on board, including 114 military personnel and 11 crew members from the Colombian Air Force. The aircraft was reportedly transporting soldiers for operational duties in the region. Military officials have confirmed that at least 66 people have died in the crash, while dozens have been injured. Earlier rescue efforts indicated that around 48 survivors were pulled from the wreckage, many of them with critical injuries, with figures varying as emergency operations continued. The number of casualties continues to be updated as search and recovery operations progress in the forested crash site. Rescue teams from the Colombian Armed Forces, local emergency services, and air units were immediately deployed to the scene. However, access to the crash site has been severely complicated by dense jungle terrain and post-crash fire damage. Several injured personnel were airlifted to hospitals in Puerto Leguízamo and Bogotá, where medical facilities were quickly strained. The aircraft was destroyed on impact and caught fire, further complicating recovery operations. Officials have not confirmed any technical malfunction or external interference, and no evidence of hostile action has been found at this stage. Colombian Defence Minister Pedro Sánchez stated that the aircraft was considered airworthy before departure and that the crew was properly trained and qualified. He added that a full investigation has been launched to determine the cause of the accident. President Gustavo Petro expressed condolences to the families of the victims and described the incident as a “horrific accident.” He also pointed to broader concerns regarding the modernization of Colombia’s military aviation fleet, while cautioning that conclusions should await the outcome of the investigation.

Colombian Air Force C-130 Crash Kills 66 After Takeoff In Amazon Region, Dozens Injured

March 24, 2026

Safarilink Aircraft Veers Off Runway At Wilson Airport, All 39 Onboard Escape Unharmed SEO DES: Wet runway & low visibility caused loss of directional control during rollout, Aircraft sustained nose, landing gear & propeller damage; AAID probe underway SOCIAL: A Safarilink Aviation aircraft veered off the runway while landing at Wilson Airport on Friday night, carrying 39 people, including 34 passengers and five crew. All occupants escaped unharmed. The Flight 090 aircraft from Kisumu to Nairobi reportedly skidded off a wet runway and came to rest on a grassy area. The Kenya Airports Authority confirmed there were no injuries. The aircraft sustained damage to its nose, landing gear, and propeller. Adverse weather conditions are suspected as a contributing factor, while Kenya’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Department has launched a probe. Image: FL360aero Video: FL360aero Nairobi, Kenya: A Safarilink Aviation passenger aircraft veered off the runway while landing at Wilson Airport on Friday night, triggering fresh scrutiny over safety, infrastructure, and emergency preparedness at one of East Africa’s busiest domestic aviation hubs. The aircraft, operating as Flight 090 from Kisumu to Nairobi, was carrying 39 people onboard, including 34 passengers and five crew members, when the incident occurred at approximately 8:55 PM (2055 hrs). All occupants escaped without injury, authorities confirmed. According to airline and airport statements, the aircraft, a De Havilland DHC-8-100 (Dash 8) operated by ALS Limited on behalf of Safarilink skidded off the runway during landing and came to a stop on a grassy section near a runway intersection. The Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) confirmed the runway excursion in an official statement, “An aircraft with thirty nine passengers on board… veered off the runway, all passengers and crew are safe, with no injuries reported.” The aircraft sustained visible damage, including to its nose section, landing gear, and propeller, though no fire or fatalities occurred. Initial details point to adverse runway conditions as a contributing factor. The runway was reported to be wet due to rain, with reduced visibility at the time of landing The aircraft lost directional control during rollout, leading to the excursion Passengers described a sudden and forceful deviation from the runway, turning what should have been a routine landing into a high-risk situation. Among those onboard was Vihiga Senator Godfrey Osotsi, who described the incident as a “crash-landing” and credited the flight crew for preventing a catastrophe. “I commend the pilot… for controlling the aircraft and steering it off the runway, causing it to stall an action that averted what could have been a catastrophic fire,” he said. The manoeuvre likely prevented the aircraft from continuing at speed along the runway, reducing the risk of fire or structural breakup. Osotsi, speaking as a survivor, said all onboard escaped safely but highlighted the severity of the situation: “I came out safely from an aircraft accident… I was among the 39 passengers on board.” Passengers experienced a sudden loss of control during landing, followed by an abrupt stop after the aircraft exited the runway. No serious injuries were reported, and all occupants were safely evacuated. Despite the safe outcome, the incident has sparked serious concerns over airport safety systems. Osotsi alleged critical failures in emergency response, stating: No ambulance was present No immediate rescue or emergency team responded Passengers were initially left without assistance “There was no ambulance on site and no emergency response team came to our aid,” he said. Kenya’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Department (AAID) has launched a formal probe into the incident.

Safarilink Aircraft Veers Off Runway At Wilson Airport, All 39 Onboard Escape Unharmed

March 23, 2026

« Previous Page1 … Page5 Page6 Page7 Page8 Page9 … Page95 Next »

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
News
Pilot Training
Civil Aviation
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training
Services
More
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube