Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

aviation litigation

Mexico City, Mexico: In a landmark ruling that reshapes the narrative of one of Cuba’s deadliest aviation disasters, a Mexican court has held charter airline Aerolíneas Damojh (Global Air) responsible for the 2018 crash of a Boeing 737 in Havana, concluding that the aircraft suffered from severe maintenance failures and “should never have flown.” The decision, based on court documents dated March 31 and reviewed by multiple international outlets, marks a significant legal departure from earlier findings that attributed the accident primarily to pilot error. An independent expert assessment presented during proceedings determined that the crash of Cubana de Aviación Flight 0972 was an “institutional accident” caused by systemic maintenance negligence. The report emphasized that the pilots were merely the “final line of defense” and were unable to prevent the catastrophe once critical failures had already developed. The judge accepted these findings and ruled that the aircraft’s operator, Global Air, bore responsibility for placing an unfit aircraft into service. The court ordered Global Air to pay USD 1.5 million in compensation to each of the families of the four Mexican crew members who initiated the lawsuit. Notably, the airline failed to appear in court and was tried in absentia, while the aircraft’s insurer also named in the case was ultimately cleared of financial liability. Legal representatives for the plaintiffs described the ruling as “groundbreaking”, arguing that it validates long-standing concerns about the airline’s maintenance practices and operational standards. The accident occurred on May 18, 2018, when a Boeing 737-200 (registration XA-UHZ) crashed shortly after takeoff from José Martí International Airport in Havana while operating a domestic flight to Holguín. Of the 113 people onboard, 112 were killed, making it one of the deadliest aviation disasters in Cuba in decades. Only one passenger survived. The aircraft was owned and operated by Global Air, a Mexican charter airline, and was leased to Cuba’s state carrier Cubana de Aviación under a wet lease agreement. The Mexican ruling directly contradicts Cuba’s 2019 official investigation, which attributed the crash primarily to pilot error and weight miscalculation, citing deficiencies in crew performance and operational procedures. In contrast, the Mexican court concluded that chronic maintenance deficiencies and systemic oversight failures were the root cause, reframing the accident as a broader organizational failure rather than an isolated human error. Global Air had faced prior operational scrutiny in Mexico, including temporary suspension following the crash as authorities examined its compliance with safety regulations. Reports cited during the case highlighted a history of technical issues and complaints, raising questions about the aircraft’s airworthiness long before the accident occurred. Beyond the initial lawsuit, broader legal proceedings are underway. Lawyers representing victims confirmed that: A class-action civil lawsuit covering all victims is in progress A criminal complaint for homicide has been filed against the airline and responsible parties However, the criminal investigation in Mexico has reportedly stalled due to limited cooperation from Cuban authorities. Samuel González, counsel for the victims’ families, described the judgment as a hard-fought and “groundbreaking” decision for Mexico. He said the ruling reinforces early admissions made in Havana by the airline’s own head of maintenance, who acknowledged to relatives that the aircraft should not have been cleared for operation. “That aircraft operated for nearly a decade without proper maintenance,” González said. “The crash occurred in Cuba, but the risk was universal.” Efforts to reach representatives of the airline for comment were unsuccessful. González also indicated that the carrier may be moving toward bankruptcy proceedings, warning that any attempt to misuse the process would be legally challenged.

Mexican Court Rejects Pilot Error, Blames Maintenance In 2018 Cuba Crash That Killed 112

Aviation Today News Desk / April 13, 2026

Mexico City, Mexico: In a landmark ruling that reshapes the narrative of one of Cuba’s deadliest aviation disasters, a Mexican […]

Washington, United States: A fatal incident lawsuit has been filed against Korean Air following the death of a 33-year-old U.S. Department of Defense employee during a long-haul international flight, with court filings alleging a series of critical failures by cabin crew in responding to an in-flight medical emergency. The incident occurred on March 29, 2024, aboard Korean Air Flight KE94, operating from Washington Dulles International Airport to Incheon International Airport. Approximately 12 hours into the 15-hour journey, passenger Porscha Tynisha Brown, 33, reportedly began experiencing severe distress after returning from the lavatory, prompting a call for medical assistance over the aircraft’s public address system. According to the lawsuit and multiple witness accounts cited in filings, Brown collapsed in the aisle and complained of difficulty breathing, repeatedly stating that she could not breathe. Fellow passengers, including those with medical training, responded to assist as cabin crew attempted to manage the situation using onboard emergency equipment. The complaint alleges that although crew members provided an oxygen mask, it was not connected to a functioning oxygen supply, effectively rendering it useless during a critical period of respiratory distress. The lawsuit further claims that an automated external defibrillator (AED) was brought to the scene but was not properly operated, and passengers assisting Brown were not given clear instructions on how to use the device. Despite indications that a shock may have been required, none was delivered. Attorneys representing the victim’s estate argue that the cabin crew failed to take command of the situation, did not effectively coordinate the emergency response, and delayed communication with the flight deck, which in turn slowed the decision to divert the aircraft. While some emergency medical interventions, including the administration of epinephrine, were reportedly attempted by passengers, Brown’s condition continued to deteriorate. The aircraft eventually diverted to Osaka, where emergency services met the flight upon landing. Brown was transported to a local medical facility and was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. The reported cause of death was acute cardiac failure. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, invokes provisions of the Montreal Convention, which governs airline liability in international travel. It alleges negligence, failure to adhere to established safety and emergency protocols, and inadequate training or execution by the airline’s crew. The filing asserts that Brown “likely would have survived” had proper procedures been followed and describes the incident as a “cascade of preventable failures.” Brown, a Maryland resident, worked as a civilian safety specialist with the U.S. Department of Defense at Fort Belvoir. Colleagues and family members describe her as a highly accomplished professional who had recently received an award of excellence and was planning to pursue further academic advancement. Her death has prompted calls for closer scrutiny of in-flight medical response standards and crew preparedness on long-haul international routes. In a statement, Korean Air acknowledged the lawsuit and said it would cooperate with legal proceedings but declined to comment further, citing the ongoing nature of the case.

Korean Air Sued Over Alleged In-Flight Medical Lapses After U.S. Defense Employee Death

Aviation Today News Desk / April 6, 2026

Washington, United States: A fatal incident lawsuit has been filed against Korean Air following the death of a 33-year-old U.S.

Beijing, China: A Beijing court has delivered a significant legal ruling in one of the longest-running civil matters connected to the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, ordering the airline to pay compensation to the families of eight passengers more than 11 years after the aircraft vanished. On 8 March 2014, Flight MH370, a Boeing 777 operating from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, disappeared from radar just under an hour after take-off with 239 people on board. Despite extensive international search efforts in the southern Indian Ocean and intermittent private expeditions, the main wreckage of the aircraft has never been found and the cause of its disappearance remains unresolved. The Chaoyang District People’s Court in Beijing ruled that Malaysia Airlines must pay 2.9 million yuan (approximately US$410,000) to each of the eight families whose relatives were aboard the flight and have now been legally declared dead. The compensation is intended to cover funeral expenses, emotional distress, and other financial losses, according to the court statement. This judgment represents the first formal Chinese court decision awarding damages in MH370-related litigation. A spokesman for the court said that 47 other cases were withdrawn after the families reached out-of-court settlements with Malaysia Airlines and its international arm, while 23 cases remain pending in the Chinese legal system. Most of the passengers on MH370 were Chinese nationals, giving Chinese courts jurisdiction over compensation claims under international air law and domestic regulations. Under the Montreal Convention, airlines are liable for proven damages in international air transport, with additional court proceedings often required to quantify emotional and non-economic damage. Malaysia Airlines has not publicly commented on the ruling at the time of publication. The compensation ruling comes as renewed interest and activity surrounds the ongoing search for MH370’s wreckage. Malaysian authorities have announced plans to restart a seabed search operation at the end of December 2025, focusing on a designated area of the Indian Ocean informed by the latest data and analysis from marine robotics firm Ocean Infinity operating under a “no-find, no-fee” contract. This new search phase underscores the enduring quest for answers from families and aviation experts nearly a decade and a half after the disappearance of the flight, one of the most enduring mysteries in modern aviation history.

Beijing Court Orders Malaysia Airlines To Pay 2.9M Yuan To Families Of MH370 Victims

Aviation Today News Desk / December 16, 2025

Beijing, China: A Beijing court has delivered a significant legal ruling in one of the longest-running civil matters connected to

Virginia, United States: A North Carolina mother has filed a $5 million lawsuit against Qatar Airways, alleging that the airline’s negligence caused her 3-year-old daughter to suffer a life-threatening allergic reaction during a transcontinental flight earlier this year. According to court filings the incident occurred on April 9 aboard Qatar Airways Flight QR710 from Washington Dulles International Airport to Doha, Qatar. The child and her mother, Swetha Neerukonda, were en route to India when the episode unfolded mid-air. Neerukonda, who stated that her daughter has severe allergies to both dairy and nuts, informed the airline crew about the medical condition multiple times prior to and during boarding. Despite these warnings, the lawsuit alleges that a flight attendant handed the child a Kit Kat bar, a chocolate snack containing both allergens, while Neerukonda was briefly away in the lavatory. When she returned and realized what had happened, Neerukonda claims she confronted the crew but was “mocked and dismissed” instead of receiving assistance. Within minutes, her daughter began experiencing symptoms of severe anaphylaxis, including difficulty breathing and facial swelling. Neerukonda administered an EpiPen on board as the crew reportedly failed to respond adequately to the emergency. Upon arrival in India, the child was hospitalized in intensive care and remained under medical supervision for two days. Doctors later confirmed she had suffered a “biphasic reaction,” a secondary wave of anaphylaxis that can occur hours after the initial episode. The federal lawsuit, filed on October 31 in the Eastern District of Virginia, seeks $5 million in damages for negligence, emotional distress, and violation of basic duty of care. Neerukonda’s legal team argues that Qatar Airways failed to provide reasonable accommodation for a known medical condition and did not follow proper emergency medical protocols during the incident. “Airlines have an obligation to ensure the safety of passengers with food allergies, particularly when they have been clearly notified in advance,” the complaint states, adding that the flight attendant’s alleged mockery compounded the distress of an already critical medical situation. Qatar Airways has not yet issued an official statement regarding the allegations.

Mother Sues Qatar Airways For $5M Over Alleged Negligence In Child’s Allergy Case

Aviation Today News Desk / November 13, 2025

Virginia, United States: A North Carolina mother has filed a $5 million lawsuit against Qatar Airways, alleging that the airline’s

Washington, United States: The family of a passenger killed in January’s midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport has filed the first federal lawsuit over the disaster, naming American Airlines, its regional affiliate PSA Airlines, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the U.S. Army as defendants. The complaint, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court, comes from Rachel Crafton, whose husband, Casey Crafton, was among the 67 people killed when American Eagle Flight 5342 collided with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter on January 29. The crash, which occurred at low altitude just half a mile from the runway, killed all 64 people aboard the Embraer E175 regional jet and all three Army crew members on the helicopter. Crafton’s lawsuit accuses the defendants of negligence and wrongful death, arguing that the tragedy was both predictable and preventable. The 115-page filing cites more than 30 documented near misses in the crowded D.C. airspace that, according to the suit, were ignored by regulators and operators. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) preliminary findings indicate insufficient vertical separation, estimated at just 75 feet, and highlight a history of over 15,000 near-misses between aircraft and helicopters in the area from 2021 to 2024, many occurring at night or above designated altitudes. The NTSB has recommended that the FAA restrict helicopter operations near DCA during active runway use and designate safer routes to prevent future collisions. The full investigation is ongoing, with a final report expected in 2026. “The defendants utterly failed in their responsibilities to protect passengers, crew, and the public,” the complaint alleges. It further faults American and PSA for inadequate pilot training, the FAA for failing to redesign or better monitor congested flight paths into Reagan National, and the Army for not preventing its aircraft from entering civilian approach corridors. The suit also highlights alleged air traffic control failures, including the absence of timely safety alerts that could have helped avoid the collision. This federal filing follows earlier Federal Tort Claims Act notices submitted by Crafton in February, seeking $250 million in damages from the FAA and the Army. Those claims are a legal prerequisite to suing the U.S. government, which typically enjoys sovereign immunity unless exceptions apply. The FAA responded with a statement of condolences, noting that it had “acted decisively” since the crash to improve safety over the capital region and pledged full cooperation with the ongoing National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation. The Army declined to comment, citing the active investigation, but said it remains focused on supporting victims’ families. American Airlines and PSA signaled they would defend themselves in court, pointing to their overall safety record. The Crafton case is expected to be a bellwether lawsuit, with other families of victims likely to join or file their own claims in the coming months. The NTSB’s final accident report, expected in 2026, will likely shape the scope of liability across all parties.

Widow of Passenger Sues American Airlines, FAA, Army Over Deadly D.C. Collision

Aviation Today News Desk / September 25, 2025

Washington, United States: The family of a passenger killed in January’s midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport has

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube