Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

AirportIncident

Niamey, Niger: At least 35 people were killed after heavily armed attackers launched a coordinated assault on Niger's main international airport and an adjoining military airbase in the capital Niamey on June 18, 2026, marking the second major attack on the strategic facility this year. According to Niger's Ministry of Defence, the attack left 11 members of the security forces and two civilians dead. Security forces repelled the assault, killing 22 attackers and arresting approximately 20 suspects. Weapons and ammunition were also seized during the operation. The attack targeted Diori Hamani International Airport and the adjacent military installation, a key security hub that hosts Niger's air force assets and serves as the headquarters of the joint military force formed by Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso under the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). Witnesses reported hearing sustained gunfire and explosions beginning around 6:00 a.m. local time. The fighting lasted for more than two hours as security forces battled the attackers around the airport complex. According to sources cited by Al Jazeera and AFP, some of the assailants arrived at a security checkpoint near the airport by taxi before engaging security personnel. Gunfire echoed across the area for hours as troops responded to the assault. Witnesses described scenes of panic around the airport, while soldiers later established checkpoints and conducted searches on roads leading to the facility. Four people were also wounded during the attack, according to preliminary figures released by the Defence Ministry. Despite the violence, Nigerien authorities said the airport remained secure and operational. In a statement broadcast on national television, the Defence Ministry said, "The international airport, which is fully secured, remains open to air traffic." The ministry added that a "large-scale operation" was underway to pursue those involved in the assault. Hours after the attack, Niger's National Civil Aviation Agency confirmed that airport operations had resumed normally. Responsibility for the attack was claimed by Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), an al-Qaeda-linked militant group that operates across the Sahel region. JNIM said it had carried out what it described as a "suicide attack" against Diori Hamani International Airport and a neighboring military base. The claim was published through the group's media outlet, Az-Zallaqa Foundation. The attack underscores the growing threat posed by jihadist groups across the Sahel, where al-Qaeda-linked and Islamic State-affiliated organizations continue to compete for territory and influence. The airport is considered one of Niger's most strategically important facilities. In addition to serving as the country's primary international gateway, the complex houses military aircraft, drones and air force infrastructure. It also serves as a command center for the Alliance of Sahel States, the regional bloc created by Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso following military takeovers in the three countries. The symbolism and military significance of the airport make it an attractive target for extremist groups seeking to challenge state authority. "The symbolism of the airport as headquarters for AES will drive intent by militants to target it," security analyst Beverly Ochieng of Control Risks told the Associated Press. The June 18 attack was the second major assault on the airport complex this year. On January 29, militants linked to Islamic State's Sahel Province launched a large-scale attack on the same facility, targeting military assets and drone infrastructure. Nigerien authorities said that the attack was repelled after fierce fighting. The latest assault reflects an evolving militant strategy in which extremist groups are increasingly expanding operations from remote rural regions into major urban centers. Ibrahim Yahaya Ibrahim, Deputy Project Director at the International Crisis Group, said the attack also reflects competition between rival jihadist factions operating in the region. "JNIM in Niger is trying to mark its territory. This is a message to the government but also to IS (Islamic State)," he said. Niger has faced escalating insecurity since the military seized power in a 2023 coup. Along with neighboring Mali and Burkina Faso, the country remains at the center of one of the world's deadliest jihadist insurgencies. The three military-led governments have shifted away from traditional Western security partnerships and strengthened cooperation with Russia while continuing operations against armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and Islamic State.

35 Killed In Gunmen Attack On Niger’s Main Airport And Military Base In Niamey

Aviation Today News Desk / June 20, 2026

Niamey, Niger: At least 35 people were killed after heavily armed attackers launched a coordinated assault on Niger’s main international […]

New Delhi, India: India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released its preliminary findings into the serious incident involving a Swiss International Air Lines Airbus A330-343 that suffered a left-engine failure during takeoff at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport, forcing the crew to reject takeoff and conduct an emergency evacuation. The incident occurred shortly after 1:27 a.m. local time on April 26, 2026, when Swiss flight LX147 was preparing to depart Delhi for Zurich with 245 people onboard, including 232 passengers and 13 crew members. According to the AAIB report, the aircraft involved was a 2012-built Airbus A330-343, registered HB-JHK, powered by Rolls-Royce Trent 772B-60 engines. The aircraft had arrived in Delhi earlier that day, operating flight LX146 from Zurich. Investigators noted that the inbound Zurich–Delhi flight was uneventful. While seven maintenance complaints were logged after arrival, all were described as routine and unrelated to the aircraft's engines, flight controls, serviceability, or controllability. The reported issues were addressed before the aircraft was cleared for the return flight to Switzerland. No abnormalities were detected during pre-flight inspections before LX147's departure from Delhi. The aircraft, parked at Stand A14, received pushback and startup clearance before taxiing to Runway 28 via taxiway J6. At 01:25:56 IST, air traffic control cleared the flight for takeoff with light winds reported from 210 degrees at one knot. Moments later, during the takeoff roll, the aircraft accelerated to approximately 106 knots. According to cockpit reports cited by investigators, the crew heard a loud bang as the No. 1 engine experienced a failure. Pilots reported seeing a large flame projecting forward from the left engine and observed the aircraft veering left. The crew immediately rejected the takeoff and brought the aircraft to a stop on Runway 28 between taxiways G1 and G2. After stopping, the flight crew informed air traffic controllers of the engine failure and requested emergency services. Communications recorded by investigators show that airport vehicles and crash fire tenders responded rapidly. Initially, responders observed smoke around the aircraft. As emergency personnel continued assessing the situation, reports indicated smoke near the left landing gear and subsequently fire near the right landing gear area. Fire crews began firefighting operations while coordinating with air traffic controllers and the flight crew. At approximately 01:35 IST, a full airport emergency was declared. Following confirmation of smoke and fire indications, both engines were shut down. Emergency evacuation procedures were initiated directly on the runway. Seven of the aircraft's eight evacuation slides were deployed and used to evacuate passengers and crew. All occupants successfully exited the aircraft. Four passengers sustained injuries during the evacuation and were transported for medical treatment. Airport responders reported that the fire had been completely extinguished by approximately 01:50 IST. The aircraft was later towed from the runway and parked at a remote stand. The airport terminated the full emergency status at 04:50 IST. Data obtained from the aircraft's post-flight report showed the first recorded warning was an "ENG 1 Stall" message at 01:27 IST during the takeoff roll. This was followed by multiple system messages including "ENG 1 FAIL," "AIR PACK 1+2 FAULT," "F/CTL RUD TRIM 1 FAULT," and "ENG 1 REV UNLOCKED." An "ENG 1 SHUTDOWN" message was subsequently recorded after the aircraft came to a stop. Investigators conducted an external inspection of the aircraft and found metallic debris near the exhaust section of the left engine along with soot and burn marks on the engine pylon behind the exhaust area. Notably, no damage was observed on the engine fan blades, and investigators reported no significant structural damage to the aircraft apart from minor dents likely caused during emergency slide deployment. A borescope inspection of the failed engine revealed extensive internal damage. Investigators discovered broken bolts and spacers from the high-pressure/intermediate-pressure bearing support assembly within the thrust reverser ducts. High-pressure bleed valves were also partially blocked by debris. Further examination identified significant damage to components within the engine core, including the High Pressure Turbine, Intermediate Pressure Turbine, Low Pressure Turbine, and High Pressure Compressor sections. Both the high-pressure and intermediate-pressure shafts were seized, preventing complete inspection. The AAIB stated that although severe internal engine damage was identified, investigators were unable to determine the precise cause of the engine failure during the initial borescope examination because the engine's rotating assemblies could not be fully inspected. Importantly, investigators found no evidence of an uncontained engine failure. The failed Rolls-Royce Trent 772B-60 engine was manufactured in 2009 and had accumulated more than 75,500 operating hours and 11,369 flight cycles. Records show the engine's last overhaul occurred in May 2016. Since that overhaul, it had accumulated nearly 40,000 additional flight hours before the incident. Both cockpit crew members were appropriately licensed and qualified on the Airbus A330. The captain had more than 18,600 total flight hours, while the first officer had accumulated more than 2,170 hours. AAIB investigators have removed and downloaded data from both the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder. Analysis of the recorded information is ongoing. The bureau said the damaged engine will be removed from the aircraft for a detailed examination aimed at identifying the root cause of the failure. Investigators are also reviewing maintenance records, operational documentation, air traffic control recordings, and witness statements. The investigation includes participation from international authorities and technical experts. France's Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA), Airbus, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Germany's BFU, the United Kingdom's AAIB, and Rolls-Royce representatives are assisting the Indian investigation under the provisions of ICAO Annex 13. The AAIB emphasized that the findings released so far are preliminary and subject to change as the investigation progresses. No interim safety recommendations have been issued at this stage.

AAIB Preliminary Report Finds No Evidence Of Uncontained Failure In Swiss A330 Engine Incident

Aviation Today News Desk / June 1, 2026

New Delhi, India: India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released its preliminary findings into the serious incident involving a

Minneapolis, United States: A United Airlines flight from Chicago to Minneapolis was met by law enforcement after a passenger allegedly attempted to breach the cockpit during the flight, triggering a major security response. The incident occurred on May 29, aboard a United Airlines service traveling from Chicago O'Hare International Airport (ORD) to Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport (MSP). During the flight, a passenger allegedly became disruptive and attempted to move toward the flight deck area, triggering an immediate response from cabin crew and flight personnel. Flight attendants and crew members reportedly intervened to prevent access to the cockpit, while the flight crew coordinated with air traffic control and law enforcement authorities. The aircraft subsequently landed safely, where police and security personnel met the flight upon arrival. Reports indicate that the situation prompted the activation of a heightened security response, with references made to a "Level 4" threat classification. However, U.S. aviation authorities and United Airlines have not publicly issued detailed statements explaining the specific classification or confirming the exact security designation. No injuries were immediately reported among the 147 passengers and six crew members and authorities took the passenger into custody following the aircraft's arrival. Investigations into the incident remain ongoing. A Level 4 threat generally refers to a severe security situation that requires immediate operational response and enhanced coordination among flight crews, airport authorities, law enforcement agencies, and federal security personnel. Such alerts may be associated with potential unlawful interference with flight operations, attempted cockpit intrusion, credible hijacking concerns, or situations that could pose a direct threat to aircraft safety. The exact terminology and classification systems can vary between agencies, airlines, airports, and security organizations. Earlier in May, United Airlines Flight 1837 operating to Newark Liberty International Airport experienced a security incident after a passenger allegedly attacked a flight attendant and attempted to gain access to the flight deck area. The aircraft landed safely and the passenger was detained by authorities. A separate United Airlines flight operating from Newark to Guatemala City was also forced to divert after a passenger allegedly attempted to open a cabin door during flight, prompting an emergency response and law enforcement action upon landing. Authorities have not announced whether federal charges will be filed in connection with the latest Chicago-Minneapolis incident. Investigators are expected to review crew reports, passenger statements, onboard security procedures, and any available cabin surveillance evidence as part of the inquiry. United Airlines has not publicly disclosed additional details regarding the passenger involved or the precise sequence of events leading to the reported cockpit breach attempt.

United Flight Hit By Security Scare After Alleged Cockpit Breach Attempt By A Passenger

Aviation Today News Desk / May 30, 2026

Minneapolis, United States: A United Airlines flight from Chicago to Minneapolis was met by law enforcement after a passenger allegedly

San Francisco, United States: An Air India co-pilot was denied entry into the United States and deported back to India after allegedly being found in possession of marijuana upon arrival in San Francisco, triggering internal and regulatory investigations. The pilot was travelling from Delhi to San Francisco on Tuesday as a “deadheading” crew member, a standard aviation practice where flight crew travel as passengers to position themselves for operational duty. The co-pilot was scheduled to operate a subsequent return flight from San Francisco to India, reportedly to Kolkata, but was unable to do so following the incident. Upon arrival at San Francisco International Airport, US authorities allegedly discovered marijuana in the pilot’s baggage during routine inspection procedures. Following the discovery, the pilot was deemed “inadmissible” under US laws and was not permitted to enter the country. He was subsequently sent back to India on the next available flight without being allowed to leave the airport premises. Air India confirmed the development in an official statement, saying, “One of our crew members travelling from Delhi to San Francisco on April 14, for positioning to operate a subsequent flight, was found to be inadmissible as per local laws and has been sent back to India.” The airline has since derostered the pilot and initiated an internal investigation into the matter. Reiterating its stance, Air India stated that it maintains zero tolerance for legal violations and will take “appropriate strict disciplinary action” in accordance with company policies. The incident has also been reported to India’s aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), which is expected to examine the case under existing safety and conduct regulations. While the full extent of regulatory action remains unclear, the case typically invites scrutiny under strict aviation norms governing substance possession and professional conduct.

Air India Co-Pilot Deported From US Over Alleged Marijuana Case, Probe Underway

Aviation Today News Desk / April 18, 2026

San Francisco, United States: An Air India co-pilot was denied entry into the United States and deported back to India

Melbourne, Australia: A China Airlines Airbus A350-900 has been grounded in Melbourne following a rare ground-handling incident that resulted in significant structural damage to the aircraft’s forward passenger door during post-arrival operations. The aircraft, registered B-18902 and operating flight CI57 from Taipei, had completed its journey and arrived in Melbourne on April 14 when the incident occurred at the gate. The aircraft unexpectedly rolled backward while still connected to the jet bridge, causing the forward left (L1) door to be partially torn from its hinges and inflicting substantial damage to the aerobridge. All passengers and crew had already disembarked at the time, and no injuries were reported. Initial findings indicate that the aircraft’s unintended movement while docked led to stress on the door assembly and surrounding fuselage structure. The force of the movement caused the jet bridge to remain fixed while the aircraft shifted, resulting in the door being pulled out of alignment and damaged at the hinge points. Such damage is considered serious, as passenger doors form part of the aircraft’s pressurized structure and require extensive inspection and certified repairs before returning to service. Australia’s aviation safety authority has launched an investigation into the occurrence, focusing on ground-handling procedures, equipment usage, and potential human factors that may have contributed to the aircraft’s movement. The cause of the accident is yet to be confirmed, although initial reports suggest that the chocks had not been placed correctly in front of and behind the tires of the massive widebody aircraft. It’s believed the aircraft started to roll back with the forward left-hand door still open, causing the door to come into contact with the jetbridge and badly damaging it. The affected aircraft remains out of service in Melbourne pending repairs and safety clearance. The temporary loss of the widebody jet is expected to have a limited but notable impact on China Airlines’ long-haul scheduling, particularly on routes connecting Asia with Australia and beyond. The Airbus A350-900 forms a key part of the airline’s long-haul fleet, supporting premium international routes across Europe, North America, and Oceania.

China Airlines A350 Grounded In Melbourne After Jet Bridge Incident Damages Cabin Door

Aviation Today News Desk / April 15, 2026

Melbourne, Australia: A China Airlines Airbus A350-900 has been grounded in Melbourne following a rare ground-handling incident that resulted in

Air Canada CEO To Step Down After English-Only Video Backlash After New York Collision SEO DES: Over 2,000 complaints filed with Canada’s Official Languages Commissioner, as Quebec’s Assembly demanded his resignation & a parliamentary panel summoned him SOCIAL: Michael Rousseau will step down as CEO of Air Canada after backlash over an English-only condolence video following a fatal runway collision at LaGuardia Airport involving Air Canada Express Flight 8646 that killed two pilots and injured 41 people. The video, lacking French despite Canada’s bilingual requirements under the Official Languages Act, sparked outrage in Quebec, drew criticism from Mark Carney and François Legault, and led to over 2,000 complaints, a Quebec Assembly motion, and a parliamentary summons. Rousseau apologised, admitting the issue overshadowed the tragedy, but the incident along with past criticism over not speaking French ultimately led to his planned exit by late 2026, with Air Canada now prioritising bilingual leadership. Montreal, Canada: Michael Rousseau, President and Chief Executive Officer of Air Canada, will step down later this year following intense backlash over an English-only condolence video issued after a fatal runway collision involving an Air Canada Express flight at LaGuardia Airport. The airline confirmed that Rousseau will retire by the end of the third quarter of 2026, a move widely viewed as directly linked to the controversy despite being officially described as part of a succession plan. The controversy stems from the March 22 accident involving Air Canada Express Flight 8646, which had departed Montreal and collided with an airport fire truck after landing in New York. The crash killed both pilots identified as Antoine Forest and Mackenzie Gunther and left 41 people injured. Investigations are being led by U.S. authorities with support from Canadian agencies, as scrutiny intensifies around runway safety and ground coordination. In the aftermath, Rousseau released a video expressing what he described as his “deepest sorrow for everyone affected.” However, the message was delivered almost entirely in English, with only two French words “bonjour” and “merci” while French subtitles were provided. The response triggered widespread outrage in Quebec and across French-speaking Canada, where language remains a politically and culturally sensitive issue. The fallout quickly escalated into a political issue. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney criticised the message, calling it a lack of “judgment” and “compassion.” Quebec Premier François Legault and other leaders also condemned the video, with calls for Rousseau’s resignation intensifying. Over 2,000 complaints filed with Canada’s Official Languages Commissioner. A unanimous motion in Quebec’s National Assembly demanding his resignation and a parliamentary committee summoning Rousseau to testify in Ottawa. The incident reignited long-standing tensions around bilingualism and corporate responsibility in Canada, particularly in Quebec. Air Canada, despite being a publicly traded company, is subject to Canada’s Official Languages Act, which requires it to communicate in both English and French. The airline’s failure to meet these expectations in a moment of national mourning drew sharp criticism, with observers noting that language in Canada is closely tied to identity and political history. Facing mounting criticism, Rousseau issued a formal apology, stating he was “deeply saddened” that his inability to speak French had diverted attention from the victims and their families. He acknowledged that the controversy overshadowed the tragedy and affected public trust in the airline’s leadership. The incident also revived scrutiny over Rousseau’s past remarks and leadership record. In 2021, shortly after becoming CEO, he drew backlash for delivering speeches in English in Montreal and stating he had lived in the city for years without learning French. These earlier comments contributed to perceptions that the latest controversy reflected a broader pattern rather than an isolated misstep. While Air Canada stated that Rousseau’s departure is part of a planned retirement and succession process, the timing has drawn clear links to the crisis. The airline has confirmed that Rousseau will remain until late 2026 and the search for a successor will prioritise bilingual leadership. The company also faced short-term reputational and market pressure, including a temporary dip in its stock following the announcement.

Air Canada CEO To Step Down After English-Only Video Backlash After New York Collision

Aviation Today News Desk / March 31, 2026

Montreal, Canada: Michael Rousseau, President and Chief Executive Officer of Air Canada, will step down later this year following intense

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube