Latest Aviation News | Updated Global Aviation News

Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

Latest News

Govt Removes Fare Caps As Airlines Oppose 60% Seats Free Of Selection Charges SEO DES: Authorities want fair fares, but airlines warn lost add-on revenue may push base prices up, raising concerns over pricing freedom and financial strain SOCIAL: The government’s move to mandate 60% free seat selection and scrap fare caps has drawn strong opposition from airlines, which warn it could lead to higher ticket prices. While authorities have asked carriers to keep fares reasonable and transparent, airlines argue the loss of ancillary revenue may force them to raise base fares, raising concerns over pricing freedom, financial strain, and market impact. The earlier fare caps, which set limits based on distance, have now been withdrawn from March 23, 2026, restoring pricing flexibility to airlines. However, the move signals a shift toward self-regulation, with the government expecting airlines to balance affordability with market-driven pricing. New Delhi, India: A policy push by the government to strengthen passenger rights and enforce fare transparency has triggered sharp resistance from India’s leading airlines, setting the stage for a broader debate over pricing freedom and regulatory oversight in the aviation sector. The Ministry of Civil Aviation, through the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), has directed carriers to ensure that at least 60% of seats on every flight are available for free selection, a move aimed at reducing ancillary charges and allowing passengers, particularly families booked under a single PNR, to be seated together without paying extra. The directive comes alongside a broader advisory asking airlines to maintain fares that are “reasonable, transparent and commensurate with market conditions,” even as the government transitions away from direct fare controls. Major carriers including Air India, IndiGo and SpiceJet have opposed the 60% free seat selection mandate, arguing that it interferes with their commercial pricing models and could have unintended financial consequences. Represented by the Federation of Indian Airlines (FIA), these carriers have formally approached the government, stating that seat selection fees form a critical component of ancillary revenues in an industry already operating on thin margins. Airlines contend that such non-ticket income helps offset high operating costs, including fuel, maintenance, and airport charges, and that restricting it would disrupt their financial balance. The government’s latest stance also marks a significant shift in its fare regulation approach. In its December 6 order, the ministry had imposed fare caps on economy class tickets, limiting prices to ₹7,500 for routes up to 500 km, ₹12,000 for distances between 500 and 1,000 km, ₹15,000 for sectors ranging from 1,000 to 1,500 km, and ₹18,000 for routes beyond 1,500 km, excluding taxes and additional fees. However, with operations now stabilised, the ministry has announced that these caps “shall stand withdrawn with effect from March 23, 2026,” effectively restoring pricing flexibility to airlines while simultaneously cautioning them against excessive or opaque fare structures. Airlines have warned that the combination of removing ancillary revenue streams through mandatory free seat allocation and expecting fare restraint could create financial strain. Industry executives argue that instead of lowering travel costs, the policy may inadvertently push up base fares as carriers attempt to recover lost income. This, they say, could neutralise the intended benefit for passengers and lead to a redistribution of costs rather than an actual reduction in overall ticket prices. The industry has also raised concerns about regulatory overreach, maintaining that fare determination in a competitive market should remain dynamic and driven by demand-supply factors. The market response has reflected these concerns, with airline stocks reacting negatively following the announcement, highlighting investor apprehension over potential revenue impacts. The ancillary revenues, including seat selection, baggage fees, and onboard services, have become an increasingly important part of airline business models globally, and any disruption to this stream could have wider financial implications. For passengers, the new framework promises immediate relief in terms of fewer add-on charges and improved seating convenience, particularly for families and groups. At the same time, the removal of fare caps theoretically allows for more competitive pricing, but also raises the risk of price volatility if not closely monitored. The government’s approach indicates a shift toward a hybrid model, where airlines are given pricing freedom but are expected to exercise self-regulation under regulatory scrutiny.

India

Govt Removes Fare Caps As Airlines Oppose 60% Seats Free Of Selection Charges

March 24, 2026

Colombian Air Force C-130 Crash Kills 66 After Takeoff In Amazon Region, Dozens Injured SEO DES: Aircraft with 125 onboard, including 114 troops and 11 crew, reportedly lost altitude after takeoff and crashed, catching fire a few km from the runway SOCIAL: A Colombian Air Force C-130 Hercules crashed shortly after takeoff from Caucayá Airport in Puerto Leguízamo, Putumayo, on March 23, 2026, while en route to Puerto Asís on a military transport mission. The aircraft was carrying 125 people, including 114 troops and 11 crew members, and reportedly lost altitude during climb-out before crashing and catching fire a few kilometers from the runway. At least 66 people were killed and dozens injured, while rescue operations continue in difficult Amazon terrain with survivors being airlifted to nearby hospitals. Authorities said the cause is still under investigation, with no evidence of hostile action. President Gustavo Petro called it a “horrific accident” and expressed condolences to the victims’ families. Puerto Leguízamo, Colombia: A Colombian Air Force Lockheed Martin C-130 Hercules transport aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff in the remote Putumayo region on March 23, 2026, killing at least 66 people and injuring dozens more, according to military and government officials. Rescue operations are still underway as authorities continue searching for survivors in difficult Amazon terrain. The aircraft departed from Caucayá Airport in Puerto Leguízamo, a remote town in southern Colombia near the borders with Peru and Ecuador, and was headed to Puerto Asís on a routine military transport mission. According to preliminary reports, the aircraft lost altitude during its initial climb phase shortly after takeoff and went down a few kilometers from the runway before bursting into flames. Authorities confirmed that there were 125 people on board, including 114 military personnel and 11 crew members from the Colombian Air Force. The aircraft was reportedly transporting soldiers for operational duties in the region. Military officials have confirmed that at least 66 people have died in the crash, while dozens have been injured. Earlier rescue efforts indicated that around 48 survivors were pulled from the wreckage, many of them with critical injuries, with figures varying as emergency operations continued. The number of casualties continues to be updated as search and recovery operations progress in the forested crash site. Rescue teams from the Colombian Armed Forces, local emergency services, and air units were immediately deployed to the scene. However, access to the crash site has been severely complicated by dense jungle terrain and post-crash fire damage. Several injured personnel were airlifted to hospitals in Puerto Leguízamo and Bogotá, where medical facilities were quickly strained. The aircraft was destroyed on impact and caught fire, further complicating recovery operations. Officials have not confirmed any technical malfunction or external interference, and no evidence of hostile action has been found at this stage. Colombian Defence Minister Pedro Sánchez stated that the aircraft was considered airworthy before departure and that the crew was properly trained and qualified. He added that a full investigation has been launched to determine the cause of the accident. President Gustavo Petro expressed condolences to the families of the victims and described the incident as a “horrific accident.” He also pointed to broader concerns regarding the modernization of Colombia’s military aviation fleet, while cautioning that conclusions should await the outcome of the investigation.

Aircraft Crashes

Colombian Air Force C-130 Crash Kills 66 After Takeoff In Amazon Region, Dozens Injured

March 24, 2026

Safarilink Aircraft Veers Off Runway At Wilson Airport, All 39 Onboard Escape Unharmed SEO DES: Wet runway & low visibility caused loss of directional control during rollout, Aircraft sustained nose, landing gear & propeller damage; AAID probe underway SOCIAL: A Safarilink Aviation aircraft veered off the runway while landing at Wilson Airport on Friday night, carrying 39 people, including 34 passengers and five crew. All occupants escaped unharmed. The Flight 090 aircraft from Kisumu to Nairobi reportedly skidded off a wet runway and came to rest on a grassy area. The Kenya Airports Authority confirmed there were no injuries. The aircraft sustained damage to its nose, landing gear, and propeller. Adverse weather conditions are suspected as a contributing factor, while Kenya’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Department has launched a probe. Image: FL360aero Video: FL360aero Nairobi, Kenya: A Safarilink Aviation passenger aircraft veered off the runway while landing at Wilson Airport on Friday night, triggering fresh scrutiny over safety, infrastructure, and emergency preparedness at one of East Africa’s busiest domestic aviation hubs. The aircraft, operating as Flight 090 from Kisumu to Nairobi, was carrying 39 people onboard, including 34 passengers and five crew members, when the incident occurred at approximately 8:55 PM (2055 hrs). All occupants escaped without injury, authorities confirmed. According to airline and airport statements, the aircraft, a De Havilland DHC-8-100 (Dash 8) operated by ALS Limited on behalf of Safarilink skidded off the runway during landing and came to a stop on a grassy section near a runway intersection. The Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) confirmed the runway excursion in an official statement, “An aircraft with thirty nine passengers on board… veered off the runway, all passengers and crew are safe, with no injuries reported.” The aircraft sustained visible damage, including to its nose section, landing gear, and propeller, though no fire or fatalities occurred. Initial details point to adverse runway conditions as a contributing factor. The runway was reported to be wet due to rain, with reduced visibility at the time of landing The aircraft lost directional control during rollout, leading to the excursion Passengers described a sudden and forceful deviation from the runway, turning what should have been a routine landing into a high-risk situation. Among those onboard was Vihiga Senator Godfrey Osotsi, who described the incident as a “crash-landing” and credited the flight crew for preventing a catastrophe. “I commend the pilot… for controlling the aircraft and steering it off the runway, causing it to stall an action that averted what could have been a catastrophic fire,” he said. The manoeuvre likely prevented the aircraft from continuing at speed along the runway, reducing the risk of fire or structural breakup. Osotsi, speaking as a survivor, said all onboard escaped safely but highlighted the severity of the situation: “I came out safely from an aircraft accident… I was among the 39 passengers on board.” Passengers experienced a sudden loss of control during landing, followed by an abrupt stop after the aircraft exited the runway. No serious injuries were reported, and all occupants were safely evacuated. Despite the safe outcome, the incident has sparked serious concerns over airport safety systems. Osotsi alleged critical failures in emergency response, stating: No ambulance was present No immediate rescue or emergency team responded Passengers were initially left without assistance “There was no ambulance on site and no emergency response team came to our aid,” he said. Kenya’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Department (AAID) has launched a formal probe into the incident.

Incidents

Safarilink Aircraft Veers Off Runway At Wilson Airport, All 39 Onboard Escape Unharmed

March 23, 2026

Air Canada Express Flight Hits Fire Truck At LaGuardia, 2 Pilots Killed And 41 Injured SEO DES: Aircraft with 76 onboard reportedly hit an ARFF vehicle on Runway 4 despite ATC warnings, overturning the truck and heavily damaging the nose SOCIAL: A tragic runway collision at New York’s LaGuardia Airport killed two pilots and injured 41 people after an Air Canada Express CRJ-900 (Jazz Aviation) struck a fire truck during landing. The aircraft, arriving from Montréal with 76 people onboard, hit the ARFF vehicle on Runway 4 despite last-minute air traffic control warnings. The impact overturned the fire truck and heavily damaged the aircraft’s nose section. Authorities said 32 injured were discharged and 9 remain hospitalized, while the fire crew sustained non-life-threatening injuries. The FAA closed the airport and the NTSB has launched an investigation into runway coordination and communication failures. New York, United States: A tragic runway collision at New York’s LaGuardia Airport killed two pilots and injured 41 people after an Air Canada Express regional jet struck a firefighting vehicle during landing late Sunday night, authorities said. The aircraft, a Bombardier CRJ-900LR operated by Jazz Aviation under Air Canada Express Flight 8646, was arriving from Montréal Trudeau International Airport with 72 passengers and 4 crew members on board, according to airport officials and preliminary aviation data. The Air Canada Express CRJ-900 plane, operated by its regional partner Jazz Aviation, was carrying 76 onboard from Montreal, Canada, said Kathryn Garcia, the executive director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Jazz is owned by Chorus Aviation. Garcia said 32 of the 41 injured had been released, while nine remained in hospital with "serious injuries." Those injured included passengers, crew members and the two officers aboard the fire ⁠truck; both officers remained hospitalised with non-life-threatening injuries The incident occurred at approximately 11:37–11:40 p.m. ET on March 22, when the aircraft was in its landing rollout on Runway 4. At the same time, a Port Authority Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) truck entered the active runway while responding to a separate emergency involving another aircraft on the ground. According to preliminary air traffic control information, the fire truck had been cleared to cross the runway, but controllers issued urgent stop instructions moments before the collision. Despite the warning, the aircraft struck the vehicle at an estimated speed of about 39 km/h (24 mph). The impact caused severe destruction to the aircraft’s nose section and cockpit, resulting in the immediate deaths of both the captain and first officer. The fire truck overturned following the collision, with two firefighters on board sustaining injuries. Passengers were evacuated using emergency slides and ground assistance as emergency crews rushed to the scene. LaGuardia Airport was immediately shut down following the accident, with the Federal Aviation Administration imposing a full ground stop. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has opened a formal investigation, focusing on runway incursion procedures, coordination between air traffic control and ground vehicles, and timing of emergency clearance instructions. The FAA and Port Authority of New York and New Jersey are also assisting in the probe. Preliminary reports indicate that the firefighting vehicle was responding to a separate incident involving a United Airlines aircraft reporting a technical issue on the ground. The complexity of simultaneous runway operations is now a key focus of investigators.

Accidents

Air Canada Express Flight Hits Fire Truck At LaGuardia, 2 Pilots Killed And 41 Injured

March 23, 2026

China Southern A330 Jet Hit By A Bird Strike, Loses Nose Radome After Shanghai Takeoff SEO DES: Impact hit the radome, tearing it off; images show exposed radar dish with nose parts missing or hanging loose, showing the severity of the strike SOCIAL: A China Southern A330 suffered a severe bird strike after takeoff from Shanghai on March 21, 2026, losing its nose radome and forcing an emergency return. The crew declared an emergency, held at low altitude, and landed safely with no injuries. Passengers were rebooked as the aircraft was withdrawn for inspection, causing temporary disruption. The impact likely involved a large bird or flock during the critical climb phase, causing extensive nose damage. The incident highlights the risks of bird strikes despite established aviation safety measures. Image: Jules Meulemans (Wikimedia) Shanghai, China: A China Southern Airlines Airbus A330 was forced to make an emergency return shortly after departure from Shanghai following a dramatic bird strike that caused extensive damage to the aircraft’s nose section. The incident occurred on March 21, 2026, involving flight CZ3554, which had departed from Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport bound for Shenzhen. The widebody aircraft, identified as an Airbus A330-343 (registration B-1062), encountered a bird strike during its initial climb, leading to the near-total loss of its nose and radome, the protective structure housing the aircraft’s weather radar. According to flight data and multiple reports, the aircraft struck either a large bird or a flock shortly after takeoff, at a relatively low altitude during a critical phase of flight. The impact was concentrated on the radome, a composite component designed to be lightweight and radar-transparent, which was severely compromised and largely torn away. Images circulating online showed the aircraft on the ground with its radar dish fully exposed and sections of the radome missing or hanging loose, showcasing the intensity of the impact. Following the strike, the flight crew halted the climb and initiated standard emergency procedures. The pilots declared an emergency with air traffic control and executed an air turn-back, opting to return to Shanghai rather than continue the flight to Shenzhen. Flight tracking data indicates the aircraft maintained a relatively low altitude before entering a holding pattern near the departure airport. It subsequently landed safely at Shanghai Hongqiao at approximately 10:45 AM local time, with no reported injuries among passengers or crew. All passengers and crew disembarked safely after landing. China Southern Airlines activated its emergency response procedures, arranging alternative travel for affected passengers, including a replacement aircraft to continue the journey to Shenzhen later the same day. The incident caused temporary disruption at Shanghai Hongqiao Airport, requiring operational adjustments as the damaged aircraft was removed from service for inspection and repairs.

Incidents

China Southern A330 Jet Hit By A Bird Strike, Loses Nose Radome After Shanghai Takeoff

March 23, 2026

7 Joint Qatar–Turkey Personnel Killed In Helicopter Crash Due To Technical Malfunction SEO DES: The deceased included 4 Qatari personnel, 1 Turkish officer, & 2 ASELSAN technicians, No hostile cause found, probe into technical failure is underway SOCIAL: A Qatar Armed Forces helicopter crashed into territorial waters on March 21 during a routine joint Qatar–Turkey mission, killing all seven onboard due to a technical malfunction. Initially reported as six dead with one missing, all victims were later recovered. The deceased included four Qatari personnel, one Turkish officer, and two ASELSAN technicians. Authorities confirmed no hostile involvement, and an investigation into the technical failure is underway. The Ministry of Interior concluded search operations after recovering the final victim and extended condolences to the families. The crash occurred during a training sortie under the Qatar–Turkey Combined Joint Force Command, highlighting ongoing military cooperation between the two nations. Doha, Qatar: A military helicopter operated by the Qatari Armed Forces crashed into the country’s territorial waters during a routine mission, killing all seven people on board, authorities confirmed. Technical malfunction caused the crash according to official statements. The incident occurred on March 21, Saturday evening during a training and routine duty flight conducted under the Qatar–Turkey Combined Joint Force Command, within the framework of close defence cooperation between the two nations Qatar’s Ministry of Defence stated that the helicopter went down at sea after experiencing a technical fault mid-flight, with no indication of external or hostile involvement. Early reports confirmed six fatalities with one individual missing, prompting an extensive search and rescue operation led by the Ministry of Interior. In a later update posted on its official X (Twitter) account, the Interior Ministry confirmed that the seventh and final missing victim had been recovered, bringing the total death toll to seven and formally concluding the search operation. The ministry expressed its “deepest condolences and sincere sympathies to the families of the martyrs,” adding that all those onboard had been accounted for. Victims Identified by Qatari Defence Ministry The Qatari Ministry of Defence publicly released the names of all victims, confirming a mix of Qatari military personnel and Turkish nationals involved in joint operations: Qatar Armed Forces Captain (Pilot) Mubarak Salem Daway Al-Marri Sergeant Fahad Hadi Ghanem Al-Khayarin Corporal Mohammed Maher Mohammed Captain Saeed Nasser Samekh Qatar–Turkey Joint Forces Major Sinan Taştekin (Turkish military officer) Turkish Civilian Technicians (ASELSAN) Süleyman Cemre Kahraman İsmail Anas Can Qatar’s Defence Ministry reiterated that the crash occurred during a “routine duty” flight and confirmed that investigations are underway to determine the precise technical failure. Turkey’s Ministry of National Defence also confirmed the deaths of its personnel and ASELSAN technicians, stating that the aircraft crashed during training activities due to a technical issue. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan expressed deep sorrow, offering condolences to both the Turkish and Qatari families affected by the tragedy. Officials confirmed the helicopter was engaged in a joint training sortie under bilateral military cooperation frameworks.The crash took place in Qatar’s territorial waters, indicating a maritime operational environment, which also contributed to the complexity of recovery efforts. Authorities have not disclosed the type of helicopter involved, nor specific technical details regarding the malfunction. Despite the crash occurring amid heightened geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, including recent drone and missile activity in the region, officials from both Qatar and Turkey confirmed there is no indication of a missile strike, attack, or external interference. The incident is currently being treated strictly as an aviation accident pending technical investigation findings.

Military Aviation

7 Joint Qatar–Turkey Personnel Killed In Helicopter Crash Due To Technical Malfunction

March 23, 2026

Alaska Airline, FedEx Jet Nearly Collide During Landing At Newark, Probe Underway SEO DES: Aircrafts came within 300–325 ft on intersecting approaches; ATC ordered Alaska jet to abort landing and climb moments before touchdown, avoiding collision SOCIAL: A near-collision between an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 and a FedEx Boeing 777 occurred on March 17, 2026, at Newark Liberty International Airport, when the aircraft came within 300–325 feet during intersecting runway approaches. Air traffic control instructed the Alaska flight to abort landing and climb moments before touchdown, avoiding a collision. All 177 people onboard were safe with no injuries reported. The Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board are investigating the serious safety incident. Newark, United States: A serious aviation safety incident is under investigation in the United States after an Alaska Airlines passenger jet and a FedEx cargo aircraft came within a few hundred feet of each other while attempting to land at Newark Liberty International Airport. The incident occurred on the evening of March 17, 2026, at approximately 8:17 p.m. local time, when both aircraft were approaching intersecting runways, according to federal authorities and radar data. Alaska Airlines Flight 294, a Boeing 737 arriving from Portland, Oregon, had been cleared to land when air traffic control instructed the pilots to abort the landing and execute a go-around. At the same time, FedEx Flight 721, a Boeing 777 cargo aircraft arriving from Memphis, Tennessee, had been cleared for final approach on a crossing runway. Preliminary flight tracking data indicates the two aircraft passed within 300 to 325 feet of each other, highlighting the severity of the close call. Audio and radar information show the Alaska Airlines jet was just moments from touchdown flying at roughly 150 feet when controllers issued the last-minute instruction to climb, allowing it to safely pass over the FedEx aircraft, which continued its landing. There were 171 passengers and six crew members onboard the Alaska Airlines flight. Both airlines confirmed their crews followed air traffic control instructions, and no injuries were reported. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) have launched investigations into the incident. Preliminary assessments suggest the situation may have stemmed from the operational complexity of managing intersecting runways, where precise timing between arriving aircraft is critical. Investigations are ongoing, and authorities are expected to release further findings on operational factors, controller actions, and procedural compliance in the coming weeks.

Incidents

Alaska Airline, FedEx Jet Nearly Collide During Landing At Newark, Probe Underway

March 22, 2026

Delta Flight Hit By Severe Turbulence Near Sydney, Multiple Crew Injured SEO DES: The Airbus A350 with 245 passengers and 15 crew landed safely in Sydney; three were hospitalised, while others were treated on site for minor injuries SOCIAL: A Delta Air Lines flight from Los Angeles to Sydney encountered severe turbulence during descent, injuring four crew members, while five individuals were medically assessed after landing. The Airbus A350 carrying 245 passengers and 15 crew landed safely at Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport, with three people taken to Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for non-life-threatening injuries. The turbulence, described as sudden and strong, occurred during final approach amid windy conditions, though authorities found no link to Tropical Cyclone Narelle, and normal airport operations continued afterward. Image: N509FZ (Wikimedia) Video: Delta Air Lines Sydney, Australia: A Delta Air Lines long-haul flight from Los Angeles to Sydney encountered severe turbulence during its descent on Friday morning, injuring multiple crew members and prompting an emergency medical response upon landing. Delta Flight DL41, operated by an Airbus A350, was carrying 245 passengers and 15 crew members when it experienced what the airline described as a “brief but strong” turbulence event shortly before arrival. The aircraft landed safely at Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport between approximately 6:40 am and 6:48 am local time, with emergency services already on standby. Paramedics assessed five individuals on arrival. Those patients included a woman in her 60s and a man in his 70s, both of whom had back pain, a woman in her 30s with a headache and back pain, a woman in her 70s with knee pain and another person of unspecified age and gender with eye pain. Three members were transported to Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for further treatment, with all injuries reported as non-life-threatening. The airline said that the injuries were limited to crew members, 4 crew faced minor injuries. Witness accounts and local reports suggested the turbulence was sudden and forceful, with cabin crew reportedly thrown into the air during the incident. The turbulence occurred during the aircraft’s final approach phase, a critical stage of flight when seatbelt compliance is essential. Weather conditions in the Sydney region at the time included strong onshore winds, although authorities stated there was no direct link to Tropical Cyclone Narelle, which was affecting parts of Australia. Flight tracking data indicated the aircraft adjusted its approach path, entering from the northwest approximately 50 km off the New South Wales coast before landing. Delta Air Lines said its priority remains the safety and well-being of passengers and crew, adding that it is supporting the injured staff following the incident. The aircraft itself was not reported to have sustained any damage, and operations at the airport continued normally after the landing.

Incidents

Delta Flight Hit By Severe Turbulence Near Sydney, Multiple Crew Injured

March 21, 2026

Investigation

TSB Links Mechanical And Human Factors To Fort Smith Crash That Killed 6, Injured 1

March 21, 2026

India Aviation Sector Losses Cross ₹24,000 Crore In 3 Years; ₹10,000 Crore More Likely SEO DES: Govt said post-1994 deregulation, airlines independently manage operations and finances based on market conditions without direct government control SOCIAL: India’s aviation sector reported ₹24,819 crore in losses over FY2022–23 to FY2024–25, the government informed Parliament. Losses were ₹18,606.78 crore in FY2022–23, ₹924.39 crore in FY2023–24, and ₹5,289.73 crore in FY2024–25 (provisional). The Ministry of Civil Aviation said the data was based on airline submissions. It also noted industry estimates of ₹9,500–₹10,500 crore additional losses in FY2025–26. The government reiterated that the sector is deregulated, with airlines independently managing operations and pricing, which depends on factors like fuel cost, demand, and capacity. New Delhi, India: India’s aviation sector has incurred cumulative losses of ₹24,819 crore over a three-year period from FY2022–23 to FY2024–25, the government informed the Rajya Sabha, reflecting continued financial strain across the industry. Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol, in a written reply, said the loss figures were based on data submitted by scheduled airline operators. According to the government, airlines reported losses of ₹18,606.78 crore in FY2022–23, which sharply narrowed to ₹924.39 crore in FY2023–24, before rising again to ₹5,289.73 crore (provisional) in FY2024–25, taking the total losses over the three financial years to ₹24,819 crore. The information was provided in response to a parliamentary query seeking details on the financial performance of the aviation sector, including loss trends and future outlook. The query also cited industry estimates suggesting that airlines could incur further losses in the range of ₹9,500 crore to ₹10,500 crore in FY2025–26, indicating that financial pressures may persist despite fluctuations in yearly performance. The government reiterated that the aviation sector operates in a deregulated environment following the repeal of the Air Corporations Act in March 1994, allowing airlines to independently take financial and operational decisions based on market conditions. It noted that aspects such as resource mobilisation, capacity planning and restructuring are managed by airlines on commercial considerations without direct government control. On airfare pricing, the minister said ticket rates are not regulated and are determined by airlines depending on several factors, including seat occupancy, fuel costs, aircraft capacity and seasonal demand. This dynamic pricing mechanism enables carriers to adjust fares in response to changing market conditions. Addressing cost structures, the government stated that the price of Aviation Turbine Fuel has been market-determined since April 1, 2001. ATF currently attracts 11 per cent central excise duty, while a reduced rate of 2 per cent applies to flights operating under the Regional Connectivity Scheme. In addition, state governments and Union Territories levy Value Added Tax on ATF at varying rates. Despite the deregulated framework, airlines continue to operate under regulatory oversight and are required to comply with provisions laid down under the Aircraft Rules, 1937, as well as civil aviation requirements issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation.

India

India Aviation Sector Losses Cross ₹24,000 Crore In 3 Years; ₹10,000 Crore More Likely

March 20, 2026

US F-35 Jet Makes Emergency Landing After Suspected Iranian Fire; Cause Under Probe SEO DES: If confirmed this may be the first known instance of an F-35 hit by Iranian air defences with major operational and strategic implications globally wide SOCIAL: A U.S. F-35 stealth fighter made an emergency landing at a military base in the Middle East after a combat mission over Iran. The pilot landed safely and is reported to be in stable condition. Initial reports suggest the aircraft may have been hit by suspected Iranian fire, but U.S. officials have not confirmed this. Authorities say the exact cause of the incident remains under investigation. The episode comes amid escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, with ongoing military operations in the region and rising risks for aerial missions. Iran: A U.S. fifth-generation F-35 stealth fighter jet was forced to make an emergency landing at a military base on Thursday in the Middle East following a combat mission over Iran, with U.S. officials confirming the incident but withholding final conclusions on its cause as investigations continue. According to the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), the aircraft “landed safely” after the mission and the pilot is in stable condition. Officials said the jet had been flying an operational sortie over Iranian territory when the emergency occurred, but stopped short of confirming whether hostile fire was responsible. Iran’s IRGC has claimed it struck the aircraft, but the claim remains unverified as U.S. officials continue to investigate the incident. Multiple U.S. media outlets, citing defence sources familiar with the matter, reported that the aircraft may have been struck by suspected Iranian surface-to-air fire. However, these assessments remain preliminary and have not been officially validated by the Pentagon. If confirmed, the incident could mark the first known case of an F-35 being successfully hit by Iranian air defences during the ongoing conflict, a development that could carry significant operational and strategic implications. The F-35 is widely regarded as one of the most advanced stealth combat aircraft in the world, designed to evade radar detection and operate in heavily defended airspace. Any confirmed damage caused by enemy fire would raise questions about evolving air defence capabilities in the region. The emergency landing comes amid intensifying hostilities between the United States and Iran since the launch of military operations on February 28. The conflict has already seen multiple aircraft losses, including drone shootdowns, a mid-air tanker crash, and friendly-fire incidents involving U.S. fighter jets. According to available data, at least 13 U.S. service members have been killed and around 200 injured since the start of operations, reflecting the high-risk environment in which air missions are being conducted. CENTCOM has stated that a formal investigation is underway to determine the exact sequence of events, including whether mechanical failure, operational factors, or hostile engagement led to the emergency landing. Until the probe concludes, officials continue to describe the cause as “suspected” rather than confirmed, even as competing narratives from U.S. and Iranian sources continue to emerge.

Military Aviation

US F-35 Jet Makes Emergency Landing After Suspected Iranian Fire; Cause Under Probe

March 20, 2026

Small Aircraft Carrying 7 Crash-Lands Into Crocodile Infested Waters In Australia SEO DES: All 7 onboard survived, one injured was taken to hospital while others were treated at the scene. Rescue teams acted fast despite crocodile risk in the area SOCIAL: A small Cessna 441 carrying seven people made a forced landing into crocodile-infested waters near Broome, Western Australia, on March 19, 2026, shortly after takeoff due to suspected engine failure. The aircraft came down in shallow tidal waters at Roebuck Bay. All seven onboard survived, with one passenger injured and taken to hospital while others were treated at the scene. Emergency services conducted a swift rescue despite crocodile risks in the area. The ATSB has launched an investigation into the incident, examining technical issues, maintenance records, and flight data. Image: Tomas Del Coro (Flickr) Video: 10News Broome, Australia: A small twin-engine aircraft carrying seven people made a forced landing into crocodile-infested waters in Roebuck Bay near Broome in Western Australia on Thursday morning, prompting a major emergency response and an ongoing investigation by aviation authorities. The aircraft, identified as a Cessna 441 Conquest, departed from Broome Airport and experienced a problem shortly after takeoff on March 19, 2026. According to preliminary information reported by multiple outlets, the flight was in its initial climb phase when the crew reportedly encountered a loss of engine power. The aircraft then descended rapidly before coming down in shallow tidal waters close to Fisherman Bend, an area known for mangroves and saltwater crocodile activity. There were seven people on board at the time of the incident, including two pilots and five passengers. Authorities confirmed that all occupants survived the crash. One passenger sustained non-life-threatening head injuries and was taken to Broome Hospital for treatment, while the remaining six were assessed at the scene and did not require hospitalisation. Witnesses in the area reported seeing the aircraft flying at a low altitude and in an unusual attitude before it disappeared from view behind mangroves. Emergency services were alerted immediately, and a coordinated rescue operation was launched involving police, marine rescue units, and paramedics. Responders faced challenging conditions due to the remote location and the presence of saltwater crocodiles in the surrounding waters, which are known to inhabit the Roebuck Bay ecosystem. Despite the environmental risks, rescue teams were able to reach the occupants and safely evacuate all seven individuals from the aircraft. Authorities have credited the rapid response of emergency services for preventing a potentially more serious outcome. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has commenced a formal investigation into the incident. Investigators are examining the aircraft’s maintenance history, operational records, and possible technical failure, with early indications pointing towards a loss of engine power shortly after departure. Officials are also reviewing weather conditions, radar data, and any available witness or video footage to reconstruct the sequence of events leading up to the crash. Authorities have appealed for members of the public who may have captured footage of the aircraft’s final moments to assist with the investigation. A full report will be released once the ATSB completes its analysis. At this stage, officials have confirmed there were no fatalities, and the incident is being treated as a survivable crash landing in water. The investigation remains ongoing.

Aircraft Crashes

Small Aircraft Carrying 7 Crash-Lands Into Crocodile Infested Waters In Australia

March 20, 2026

« Previous Next »

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Email

Recent News

Naha, Japan: A Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) F-15J fighter jet suffered a landing-gear malfunction while landing at Naha Airport in Okinawa on August 18, forcing the closure of the airport’s second runway for about four hours and delaying dozens of civilian flights. The pilot escaped without injury. The aircraft was identified as a Mitsubishi F-15J Eagle, registration 22-8809. The single-seat fighter was operating from JASDF Naha Air Base and was returning from a scramble mission conducted as part of Japan’s response to a possible airspace intrusion. The incident occurred at around 12:55 p.m. local time as the F-15J landed on Runway 36L, also known as Naha Airport’s B Runway. According to Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) officials, the aircraft developed a problem involving its landing gear during the landing sequence. The jet subsequently became tilted and stopped on the runway. The precise mechanical cause remains under investigation. Images and video from the scene showed the aircraft resting at an angle, with its left side lowered toward the runway. The occurrence was a possible failure of the left main landing gear. Other reports said the fighter slid along the runway after the gear collapsed, with the aircraft rotating roughly 180 degrees before coming to rest facing in the opposite direction. A JASDF spokesman told Stars and Stripes that the landing gear apparently failed as the aircraft touched down shortly before 1 p.m. and that the fighter’s left wing contacted the runway before it came to a stop. The spokesman said the pilot was not injured and that the extent of damage to the aircraft was still being assessed. The aircraft was eventually removed from the runway using recovery equipment, including a crane. Naha Airport officials said the runway remained closed for approximately four hours while the fighter was removed, the area was cleaned and safety inspections were completed. Runway operations subsequently resumed. The closure had a significant effect on civilian operations because Naha Airport is a dual-use facility, serving both commercial aviation and the JASDF. With the B Runway unavailable, civilian aircraft were required to use the other runway. Airport officials said 40 commercial flights were delayed, with some delays exceeding 30 minutes. The incident also drew a response from Okinawa Governor Denny Tamaki, who described the situation as deeply regrettable and called for the cause of the incident to be investigated. The governor’s office has sought information on the circumstances surrounding the fighter’s landing and measures to prevent a recurrence. The F-15J’s condition and the precise reason for the landing-gear failure remain subject to investigation. At this stage, available official data does not establish whether the malfunction resulted from a particular component failure, maintenance issue or other technical factor.

JASDF F-15J Suffers Landing Gear Failure At Naha Airport, Delaying Dozens Of Flights

August 20, 2026

Malaysia Airlines MH89 Aborts Takeoff At Narita Over Engine Issue, No Injuries Reported

Malaysia Airlines MH89 Aborts Takeoff At Narita Over Engine Issue, No Injuries Reported

August 20, 2026

Carlisle, United States: A Cessna 150 collided with a Pennsylvania State Police Bell 407 helicopter at Carlisle Regional Airport in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday evening, August 19, killing the Cessna pilot and injuring two state police troopers aboard the helicopter. The collision occurred near a runway at the airport, about 110 miles northwest of Philadelphia. The FAA identified the aircraft involved as a Cessna 150 and a Bell 407. The Cessna pilot, believed to have been the aircraft's only occupant, died in the crash. Authorities had not released the pilot's identity pending notification of next of kin. The Bell 407 was operated by the Pennsylvania State Police and was carrying two members of the department's aviation unit, Cpl. Bryce Corman and Tpr. Jason Mills. The helicopter was conducting a routine training exercise at Carlisle after operating from its Harrisburg base. According to Acting Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Lt. Col. George Bivens, the helicopter was positioned several feet above a grassy area next to a runway when the Cessna approached from behind. The aircraft came down along the runway before veering sharply to the right at the last moment and striking the helicopter from the rear. “As that Cessna came down along that runway for an unknown reason, it veered hard to the right. At the last moment, it struck the helicopter from the rear,” Bivens said. The Cessna struck the helicopter's rear section, involving the tail rotor and then the main rotor, sending both aircraft into a violent crash. The Cessna broke into multiple pieces, while the Bell 407 lost its rotor blades and tail boom before rolling over and coming to rest on its side, partially on its roof. The two troopers were initially trapped inside the helicopter. Corman was able to push out a window and help Mills escape through the opening. Mills was believed to have suffered more serious injuries and significant bleeding, according to Bivens. Both troopers were taken to Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Dr. Ashley Ludwig, the hospital's trauma medical director, said they arrived as Level 1 trauma patients but had only minor injuries and were in stable condition. One was expected to be discharged Wednesday night, while the other was admitted for further observation. Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Col. Christopher Paris said the helicopter crew was conducting routine training when the collision occurred. He said the helicopter pilots would not have been able to see the Cessna approaching from behind. “The pilots would not have been able to even see that airplane approaching them,” Paris said. Governor Josh Shapiro visited the medical center and praised the emergency response and medical teams involved in treating the injured troopers. “Tonight could have been much worse,” Shapiro said, adding that the response was “an example of Pennsylvania at its finest.” Emergency personnel responded to the airport following the crash, and the coroner was called to the scene. Local residents Patrick Brown and Lloyd Slusser also reportedly crossed a fence and ran toward the wreckage to assist after witnessing the crash. The Cessna was reportedly from the local area, but authorities have not disclosed its departure point, destination or the purpose of its flight. The aircraft's pilot was believed to be its sole occupant. The exact cause of the collision remains undetermined. Officials said the Cessna's sudden right turn was made for an unknown reason, and investigators will examine why the aircraft veered from its approach path, the helicopter's position, airport operations and communications. Carlisle Regional Airport does not have an air traffic control tower. Pilots operating there use a common traffic radio frequency, and investigators are expected to examine those communications as part of the inquiry. State police also secured photographs and video that could assist investigators in reconstructing the collision. The FAA and National Transportation Safety Board are leading the investigation, with Pennsylvania State Police assisting. The NTSB said the wreckage would be documented and moved to a secure facility for further examination. Although the FAA and NTSB described the incident as a midair collision, Pennsylvania State Police later said the helicopter was on the ground at the time of the impact. Officials have not yet established whether the Cessna was airborne at the exact moment of contact. The distinction, along with the reason for the Cessna's sudden deviation, remains part of the investigation. No final cause has been determined, and authorities have not attributed the crash to pilot error, mechanical failure, communications issues or any other specific factor.

Pilot Killed After Cessna 150 Collides With Pennsylvania State Police Helicopter

August 20, 2026

Seven Killed In Helicopter Crash In Kenya’s Samburu County During Safari Charter Flight

August 20, 2026

Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Airways said on Wednesday, August 19, 2026, that its fuel costs increased 72% during the first half of 2026, with the airline attributing the sharp rise to the ongoing Middle East conflict. The announcement, reported from Nairobi, also highlighted wider operational disruption, including delays in receiving aircraft spare parts and carrying out maintenance. Kenya Airways’ Acting Group Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Capt. George Kamal, said the conflict and resulting cost pressures were affecting the carrier’s operations as it works to contain expenses. The latest fuel-cost increase comes as Kenya Airways faces a significantly higher operating burden. Kamal has previously said fuel represents a substantial share of airline operating expenses in Africa, with the figure now exceeding 50% under current market conditions. In June, he said fuel could account for between 50% and 60% of operating costs depending on taxation and regulatory pressures. The airline is also responding to the higher cost environment by tightening spending. Recent reporting said Kenya Airways is reviewing its contracts as part of a fresh cost-cutting drive, while aircraft availability remains a challenge because of difficulties obtaining parts and completing maintenance. The pressure on fuel prices follows the sharp disruption to energy markets caused by the conflict. Earlier in the crisis, Kamal said the price of Jet A-1 had more than doubled and that fuel accounted for about 40% of Kenya Airways’ total operational costs at the time. The airline had also built fuel reserves sufficient for roughly 50 days and explored additional supplies from India. At the same time, the conflict has produced an unusual benefit for Kenya Airways by diverting passengers away from disrupted Middle Eastern transit hubs. In March, Kamal said some routes had recorded load factors of more than 90%, compared with roughly 70% during the normal low season, as travellers looked for alternatives through Nairobi. The airline is therefore facing a mixed impact from the crisis: stronger demand on some international routes, but substantially higher fuel and operational costs and difficulties obtaining aircraft parts. Kenya Airways’ latest August 19 announcement places the 72% first-half fuel-cost increase at the centre of those pressures as the carrier continues efforts to control costs and maintain fleet availability.

Kenya Airways Fuel Costs Surge 72% As Middle East Conflict Drives Up Operating Pressure

August 19, 2026

Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - PART 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Citywide Networks Must Be Designed Around Real Travel Patterns

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 3

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Part 2- Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 2

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube