News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

AirSafety

Pennsylvania, United States: A former New Jersey flight instructor who continued teaching students despite losing his FAA pilot certification has been sentenced to more than six years in federal prison following a fatal 2022 training flight crash that killed one of his students and exposed a broader fraud scheme involving a Pennsylvania flight school named ProFlite Aero Services. On June 11, 2026, Philip Everton McPherson II was sentenced to 78 months in federal prison for his role in the September 28, 2022 crash of a Piper PA-28-140 near Allentown, Pennsylvania, which claimed the life of a student pilot identified in court documents only as K.K. The sentence followed McPherson's guilty plea in October 2025 to involuntary manslaughter, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, obstruction of an administrative proceeding, and 40 counts of serving as an airman without a valid certificate. According to federal prosecutors, the accident occurred when McPherson departed Queen City Airport in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as pilot-in-command of a Piper PA-28-140 with student pilot K.K. on board. Shortly after takeoff, the aircraft crashed, killing the student pilot. McPherson survived the accident but suffered serious injuries. The crash later became the focus of a federal criminal investigation after authorities discovered that McPherson was not legally qualified to act as pilot-in-command at the time of the flight. Court filings stated that McPherson knew he lacked the competence and legal authority required to safely operate the aircraft. Federal investigators alleged that McPherson had been involved in two prior aircraft accidents and nearly a third incident. He failed an FAA re-examination, commonly known as a "709 ride," on September 29, 2021 due to a lack of demonstrated competence. He voluntarily surrendered his pilot certificate on October 7, 2021. He allowed his Temporary Airman Certificate to expire on November 8, 2021. Despite those circumstances, he continued operating aircraft and instructing students. Prosecutors argued that these actions demonstrated gross negligence and formed the basis for the involuntary manslaughter charge. The investigation found that McPherson continued flying even after surrendering his certification. Federal authorities charged him with 40 counts of serving as an airman without a certificate, alleging that he acted as pilot-in-command on dozens of flights carrying passengers between October 12, 2021 and September 20, 2022 without possessing a valid FAA pilot certificate. Initially, prosecutors said the charges carried a theoretical maximum penalty of 128 years in prison and more than $10 million in fines. As investigators dug deeper into the case, attention turned to ProFlite Aero Services, a Pennsylvania-based flight school where McPherson worked as an instructor. Federal prosecutors alleged that McPherson and flight school owner Nouman Saleem knowingly concealed the fact that McPherson no longer held a valid FAA certificate. According to the superseding indictment, the two men exchanged text messages discussing how to hide McPherson's failed FAA re-examination from students. Investigators alleged that students continued paying for flight instruction despite the instructor lacking the credentials legally required to provide training. Court records state that students paid approximately $101,000 to ProFlite Aero Services for instruction conducted by McPherson. Authorities said those flight hours were effectively invalid because McPherson did not possess a valid FAA pilot certificate during that period. Federal authorities further alleged that McPherson and Saleem attempted to obstruct an FAA administrative proceeding. According to prosecutors, both men submitted false affidavits claiming that FAA personnel had informed them McPherson could continue providing flight instruction despite his certification status. Investigators later concluded those statements were false. The investigation eventually led to criminal charges against ProFlite Aero Services owner Nouman Saleem. In February 2025, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment charging both McPherson and Saleem in connection with the fatal crash and the alleged fraud scheme. Saleem faced charges including, conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and obstruction of an administrative proceeding. On May 21, 2025, Saleem pleaded guilty to all three charges. As part of his plea agreement, he agreed to pay $101,528 in restitution to victims affected by the scheme. On October 14, 2025, McPherson pleaded guilty before the U.S. District Judge John M. Gallagher in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The guilty plea covered. one count of involuntary manslaughter, one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, one count of obstruction of an administrative proceeding and forty counts of serving as an airman without a certificate. The plea effectively ended the criminal case that began with the fatal 2022 crash. On June 11, 2026, McPherson was sentenced to 78 months (6.5 years) in federal prison, three years of supervised release, a $5,000 fine, $19,530 in restitution and a $4,300 special assessment. The case was investigated by the U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General with substantial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration. The prosecution was handled by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case stands out as one of the rare instances in which a fatal flight-training accident resulted not only in aviation-related charges but also in involuntary manslaughter, fraud, and obstruction convictions tied to a broader scheme involving unlicensed flight instruction and deception of paying students.

Aircraft Crashes

Former Flight Instructor Sentenced After Student Pilot Dies In Training Crash

Aviation Today News Desk / June 12, 2026

Pennsylvania, United States: A former New Jersey flight instructor who continued teaching students despite losing his FAA pilot certification has […]

New Delhi, India: India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released its preliminary findings into the serious incident involving a Swiss International Air Lines Airbus A330-343 that suffered a left-engine failure during takeoff at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport, forcing the crew to reject takeoff and conduct an emergency evacuation. The incident occurred shortly after 1:27 a.m. local time on April 26, 2026, when Swiss flight LX147 was preparing to depart Delhi for Zurich with 245 people onboard, including 232 passengers and 13 crew members. According to the AAIB report, the aircraft involved was a 2012-built Airbus A330-343, registered HB-JHK, powered by Rolls-Royce Trent 772B-60 engines. The aircraft had arrived in Delhi earlier that day, operating flight LX146 from Zurich. Investigators noted that the inbound Zurich–Delhi flight was uneventful. While seven maintenance complaints were logged after arrival, all were described as routine and unrelated to the aircraft's engines, flight controls, serviceability, or controllability. The reported issues were addressed before the aircraft was cleared for the return flight to Switzerland. No abnormalities were detected during pre-flight inspections before LX147's departure from Delhi. The aircraft, parked at Stand A14, received pushback and startup clearance before taxiing to Runway 28 via taxiway J6. At 01:25:56 IST, air traffic control cleared the flight for takeoff with light winds reported from 210 degrees at one knot. Moments later, during the takeoff roll, the aircraft accelerated to approximately 106 knots. According to cockpit reports cited by investigators, the crew heard a loud bang as the No. 1 engine experienced a failure. Pilots reported seeing a large flame projecting forward from the left engine and observed the aircraft veering left. The crew immediately rejected the takeoff and brought the aircraft to a stop on Runway 28 between taxiways G1 and G2. After stopping, the flight crew informed air traffic controllers of the engine failure and requested emergency services. Communications recorded by investigators show that airport vehicles and crash fire tenders responded rapidly. Initially, responders observed smoke around the aircraft. As emergency personnel continued assessing the situation, reports indicated smoke near the left landing gear and subsequently fire near the right landing gear area. Fire crews began firefighting operations while coordinating with air traffic controllers and the flight crew. At approximately 01:35 IST, a full airport emergency was declared. Following confirmation of smoke and fire indications, both engines were shut down. Emergency evacuation procedures were initiated directly on the runway. Seven of the aircraft's eight evacuation slides were deployed and used to evacuate passengers and crew. All occupants successfully exited the aircraft. Four passengers sustained injuries during the evacuation and were transported for medical treatment. Airport responders reported that the fire had been completely extinguished by approximately 01:50 IST. The aircraft was later towed from the runway and parked at a remote stand. The airport terminated the full emergency status at 04:50 IST. Data obtained from the aircraft's post-flight report showed the first recorded warning was an "ENG 1 Stall" message at 01:27 IST during the takeoff roll. This was followed by multiple system messages including "ENG 1 FAIL," "AIR PACK 1+2 FAULT," "F/CTL RUD TRIM 1 FAULT," and "ENG 1 REV UNLOCKED." An "ENG 1 SHUTDOWN" message was subsequently recorded after the aircraft came to a stop. Investigators conducted an external inspection of the aircraft and found metallic debris near the exhaust section of the left engine along with soot and burn marks on the engine pylon behind the exhaust area. Notably, no damage was observed on the engine fan blades, and investigators reported no significant structural damage to the aircraft apart from minor dents likely caused during emergency slide deployment. A borescope inspection of the failed engine revealed extensive internal damage. Investigators discovered broken bolts and spacers from the high-pressure/intermediate-pressure bearing support assembly within the thrust reverser ducts. High-pressure bleed valves were also partially blocked by debris. Further examination identified significant damage to components within the engine core, including the High Pressure Turbine, Intermediate Pressure Turbine, Low Pressure Turbine, and High Pressure Compressor sections. Both the high-pressure and intermediate-pressure shafts were seized, preventing complete inspection. The AAIB stated that although severe internal engine damage was identified, investigators were unable to determine the precise cause of the engine failure during the initial borescope examination because the engine's rotating assemblies could not be fully inspected. Importantly, investigators found no evidence of an uncontained engine failure. The failed Rolls-Royce Trent 772B-60 engine was manufactured in 2009 and had accumulated more than 75,500 operating hours and 11,369 flight cycles. Records show the engine's last overhaul occurred in May 2016. Since that overhaul, it had accumulated nearly 40,000 additional flight hours before the incident. Both cockpit crew members were appropriately licensed and qualified on the Airbus A330. The captain had more than 18,600 total flight hours, while the first officer had accumulated more than 2,170 hours. AAIB investigators have removed and downloaded data from both the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder. Analysis of the recorded information is ongoing. The bureau said the damaged engine will be removed from the aircraft for a detailed examination aimed at identifying the root cause of the failure. Investigators are also reviewing maintenance records, operational documentation, air traffic control recordings, and witness statements. The investigation includes participation from international authorities and technical experts. France's Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA), Airbus, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Germany's BFU, the United Kingdom's AAIB, and Rolls-Royce representatives are assisting the Indian investigation under the provisions of ICAO Annex 13. The AAIB emphasized that the findings released so far are preliminary and subject to change as the investigation progresses. No interim safety recommendations have been issued at this stage.

AAIB Preliminary Report Finds No Evidence Of Uncontained Failure In Swiss A330 Engine Incident

Aviation Today News Desk / June 1, 2026

New Delhi, India: India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has released its preliminary findings into the serious incident involving a

Virgin Atlantic Flight Makes Emergency Landing In Ireland After Engine Malfunction

Aviation Today News Desk / June 1, 2026

Shannon, Ireland: A Virgin Atlantic Airbus A330-900neo operating a scheduled service from London Heathrow to Montego Bay, Jamaica, made an

Bangalore, India: An Air India Airbus A321 operating flight AI2651 from Delhi to Bengaluru suffered a tail-strike incident while landing at Bengaluru’s Kempegowda International Airport on Thursday morning, prompting the airline to ground the aircraft for detailed technical inspections. The incident occurred during the landing phase of the domestic service arriving from Delhi. According to airline officials and multiple media reports, the aircraft landed safely and all passengers and crew members disembarked normally without injuries. The aircraft encountered wake turbulence while approaching the runway at Bengaluru airport. The turbulence was reportedly generated by a departing wide-body aircraft operating nearby at the time of the approach. As the Airbus A321 approached for landing, the pilots initiated a precautionary go-around manoeuvre after experiencing unstable conditions caused by the wake turbulence. During the manoeuvre, the aircraft’s rear lower fuselage reportedly made contact with the runway, resulting in the tail strike. Air India confirmed the occurrence in an official statement, saying the aircraft “experienced a tail-strike during landing.” The airline added that the aircraft has since been withdrawn from service for comprehensive inspections and engineering assessments. The aircraft involved was a narrow-body Airbus A321 operating the Delhi–Bengaluru sector as AI2651. Flight-tracking data also identified the aircraft as an Airbus A321neo variant typically deployed on high-density domestic routes. The aircraft was carrying 181 people, including crew members onboard during the incident. Following the incident, Air India cancelled the return Bengaluru–Delhi service AI2652. The airline stated that alternative travel arrangements were being made for affected passengers while ground staff in Bengaluru were assisting travellers with rebooking and support services. The airline further said the incident would be investigated in coordination with relevant aviation regulatory authorities and under established operational safety procedures.

Air India A321 Suffers Tail Strike During Bengaluru Landing, Aircraft Grounded

Aviation Today News Desk / May 22, 2026

Bangalore, India: An Air India Airbus A321 operating flight AI2651 from Delhi to Bengaluru suffered a tail-strike incident while landing

Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing In Paris After Engine Flames And Cabin Power Loss SEO DES: Passengers heard an explosion-like sound from the left engine, saw sparks and flashes, while cabin lights briefly went dark mid-flight SOCIAL: A Delta Air Lines Airbus A330-300 flying from New York to Milan made an emergency landing in Paris after passengers heard a loud bang from the engine, saw flashes or flames outside the aircraft, and experienced a brief cabin power loss. The crew declared an emergency over France and diverted safely to Charles de Gaulle Airport, where fire and rescue teams were waiting. No injuries were reported, and the aircraft was later grounded for technical inspection following the suspected engine-related malfunction. Paris, France: A Delta Air Lines Airbus A330-300 operating a transatlantic service from New York to Milan made an emergency landing in Paris after passengers reported hearing a loud bang from one of the aircraft’s engines, followed by visible flames outside the cabin and a temporary loss of electrical power. The incident involved Delta Flight DL286, which departed John F. Kennedy International Airport on the afternoon of May 18 for a scheduled overnight flight to Milan Malpensa Airport aboard an 18-year-old Airbus A330-300. The aircraft had crossed the Atlantic normally and was cruising over French airspace early on May 19 when passengers and crew experienced what was described as a sudden “explosion-like” sound from the left engine area. Several passengers later said they observed sparks or flashes from the engine, while others reported the cabin briefly went dark as electrical power fluctuated onboard. Flight tracking data showed the aircraft abruptly altered course and declared an emergency using squawk code 7700 before diverting toward Charles de Gaulle Airport. Emergency vehicles, including airport fire and rescue crews, were positioned alongside the runway as the widebody jet approached Paris. The Airbus landed safely at CDG without further incident. No injuries among passengers or crew were immediately reported. Passengers onboard later described a tense but controlled atmosphere inside the cabin. One traveler wrote online that “the lights went out and the flight attendants booked it to the front of the plane,” while another passenger claimed people seated on the left side of the aircraft could see what appeared to be an engine fire. Others praised the crew for remaining calm and reassuring passengers throughout the diversion and landing. The aircraft involved in the incident was identified as a Delta Airbus A330-323 registered N818NW. The jet had departed JFK at approximately 4:28 PM EDT and diverted into Paris roughly six hours later after the crew declared the emergency over France. While the exact technical cause has not yet been officially confirmed, early reports indicate the crew responded to an engine-related malfunction accompanied by an electrical disturbance affecting cabin systems. Following the landing, the aircraft was removed from service for inspection by maintenance personnel and aviation authorities. Delta Air Lines had not released a detailed technical statement at the time of publication.

Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing In Paris After Engine Flames And Cabin Power Loss

Aviation Today News Desk / May 20, 2026

Paris, France: A Delta Air Lines Airbus A330-300 operating a transatlantic service from New York to Milan made an emergency

Ankara, Turkey: An aircraft carrying Pedro Sánchez was forced to divert and make an emergency landing at Ankara after a technical malfunction disrupted its flight en route to Armenia, officials confirmed. The Spanish Prime Minister was travelling aboard a government-operated Airbus A310, part of Spain’s official state aviation fleet. The aircraft had departed from Madrid and was scheduled to land in Yerevan for the European Political Community summit, a major diplomatic gathering of European leaders. Midway through the flight, the crew detected what officials described as an “unforeseen technical event.” While the malfunction was not publicly specified in detail, it was classified as a precautionary safety concern rather than a critical failure. In accordance with international aviation safety protocols, the pilots immediately requested diversion to the nearest suitable airport. The aircraft subsequently landed safely in Ankara without incident. No injuries were reported among Sánchez or members of his delegation, and there were no signs of panic or emergency escalation during the landing. Authorities confirmed that all passengers disembarked normally and were provided with necessary arrangements upon arrival. Following the diversion, the Prime Minister and his delegation were required to remain overnight in Ankara due to standard diplomatic and operational procedures. The unscheduled stop resulted in a delay to the official itinerary for the European summit in Armenia. Technical teams later inspected the aircraft and resolved the issue that had prompted the diversion. The following day, the aircraft was cleared for further operation, and Sánchez resumed his journey to participate in the summit discussions. The meeting focuses on strengthening political cooperation across Europe, addressing regional security concerns, and coordinating responses to emerging geopolitical challenges. Officials have emphasized that the incident was strictly technical in nature. There were no indications of adverse weather conditions, external interference, or security threats linked to the diversion. Aviation authorities handled the situation in accordance with established safety protocols, ensuring the safe outcome of the flight. The aircraft involved belongs to Spain’s official government fleet used for transporting senior state officials, including the Prime Minister and members of the royal or diplomatic delegation. Unlike commercial flights, such aircraft operate under military aviation command and are deployed for high-level international travel and state duties.

Spanish PM’s Aircraft Makes Emergency Landing In Ankara Due To Technical Fault

Aviation Today News Desk / May 5, 2026

Ankara, Turkey: An aircraft carrying Pedro Sánchez was forced to divert and make an emergency landing at Ankara after a

Air India Express Flight Makes Emergency Landing In Lucknow After Mid-Air Smoke Alert SEO DES: Oxygen masks were deployed inside the cabin, leading to panic among passengers. The aircraft carrying 148 people diverted safely with no injuries SOCIAL: A Delhi-bound Air India Express flight (IX 1523) made an emergency landing in Lucknow after a Mayday call over suspected onboard smoke. The aircraft, carrying 148 people, diverted safely with no injuries. Oxygen masks were deployed mid-air, causing panic, while authorities activated full emergency response on ground. Post-landing checks found no visible smoke or fire; the aircraft had been grounded for detailed inspection, and passengers were provided alternate arrangements. Lucknow, India: A Delhi-bound Air India Express flight made an emergency landing at Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport on Monday evening after the crew issued a Mayday call following suspected smoke inside the aircraft, triggering a full-scale emergency response. Flight IX 1523, operating from Bagdogra to Delhi, declared the distress call at around 4:58 pm while cruising at approximately 36,000 feet over Uttar Pradesh’s Ambedkar Nagar region. There were 148 passengers and crew onboard. The cockpit reportedly received indications of possible smoke from onboard systems, prompting immediate emergency procedures. As a precautionary measure, oxygen masks were deployed inside the cabin, leading to panic among passengers. Crew members managed the situation while coordinating with air traffic control for a diversion. Following the Mayday alert, authorities at Lucknow airport declared a full emergency, with fire tenders, medical teams, and rescue personnel placed on standby ahead of the aircraft’s arrival. The flight was diverted and landed safely at the airport, where emergency protocols were executed in line with standard aviation safety procedures. All passengers and crew onboard were safely evacuated, and no injuries were reported. Initial inspections conducted after landing did not detect any visible smoke or fire despite the earlier cockpit indications. The aircraft has since been grounded as a precaution and will undergo detailed technical checks before being cleared for further operations, according to reports. Passengers experienced delays and uncertainty regarding onward travel, with arrangements being made for alternate flights and assistance as required.

Air India Express Flight Makes Emergency Landing In Lucknow After Mid-Air Smoke Alert

Aviation Today News Desk / March 31, 2026

Lucknow, India: A Delhi-bound Air India Express flight made an emergency landing at Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport on Monday

California, United States: A scheduled trans‑Pacific trip by Delta Air Lines ended with an emergency diversion on the morning of November 19 after the crew detected a serious engine fault, authorities said. Flight DL 357 departed from Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (Honolulu) at approximately 11 :10 p.m. HST the previous evening, bound for Salt Lake City International Airport. On board were 212 passengers and eight crew members. Around four hours into the flight, cruising at 35,000 feet over open ocean, the flight crew reported a fault in one of the aircraft’s two engines and initiated a shutdown of that engine as a precaution. The crew declared an emergency, activating transponder code 7700, to secure priority handling from air‑traffic control. With the fault confirmed and the aircraft operating on a single engine, the decision was made to divert to the nearest suitable airport. The crew elected to land at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), where full emergency and rescue resources could be readily mobilised. The aircraft touched down on Runway 7R just prior to 7:00 a.m. PST and taxied to Gate 3A in Terminal 3. A full fire‑and‑rescue vehicle presence met the aircraft on arrival. Emergency responders carried out an external inspection. No visible structural damage or fire was reported, and all passengers and crew disembarked safely, with no injuries reported. In the aftermath, the Federal Aviation Administration﹙FAA) opened an investigation into the incident, examining the engine fault and reviewing whether maintenance or manufacturing factors played a role. Initial commentary suggests the fault is believed to stem from a mechanical anomaly rather than a maintenance‑shortcoming.

Delta Flight DL 357 Diverts To Los Angeles After Mid-Air Engine Fault, Lands Safely

Aviation Today News Desk / November 20, 2025

California, United States: A scheduled trans‑Pacific trip by Delta Air Lines ended with an emergency diversion on the morning of November 19 after