Latest Aviation News | Updated Global Aviation News

Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

Latest News

Air Peace A320 Suffers Engine Damage After Ground Vehicle Collision At Lagos Airport SEO DES: The collision occurred after passengers disembarked with no injuries, The A320 became unserviceable, causing delays and possible cancellations SOCIAL: An Air Peace Airbus A320 suffered major engine damage after a NAHCO baggage conveyor belt vehicle struck the aircraft at Murtala Muhammed Airport in Lagos, Nigeria, shortly after Flight P47427 arrived from Kano on 15 July. The collision occurred after all passengers had disembarked, and no injuries were reported. Air Peace said the aircraft was rendered "totally unserviceable," disrupting its domestic schedule with delays and possible cancellations. The airline is working with NAHCO and Nigerian aviation authorities to investigate the incident and prevent a recurrence. Lagos, Nigeria: An Air Peace Airbus A320 sustained significant engine damage after being struck by a baggage conveyor belt vehicle operated by the Nigerian Aviation Handling Company (NAHCO) Plc at Murtala Muhammed Airport in Lagos, Nigeria, disrupting the airline's domestic operations and forcing schedule changes across its network. The incident occurred on Tuesday, 15 July, shortly after Air Peace Flight P47427 completed its scheduled service from Kano to Lagos. According to the airline, the aircraft had arrived safely, and all passengers had disembarked before the ground handling accident occurred. No injuries were reported among passengers or ground personnel. Air Peace said a NAHCO baggage conveyor belt vehicle collided with one of the Airbus A320's engines while the aircraft was on the ground. The impact caused extensive damage, with the airline stating that the handling equipment "tore into" the engine, leaving the aircraft "totally unserviceable." Air Peace said the damaged Airbus A320 had been scheduled to operate multiple flights across its domestic network over the coming days, meaning its sudden withdrawal from service would significantly affect operations. The airline warned that several scheduled flights would experience delays, while others could be cancelled as it rearranges aircraft within its fleet to minimize disruptions. In a statement, the carrier apologized to passengers whose travel plans were affected and said its operational and customer service teams were providing alternative arrangements and assistance wherever possible. The airline emphasized that the safety of its passengers, crew and equipment remains its highest priority. Air Peace added that it is working closely with NAHCO and the relevant Nigerian aviation authorities to determine the circumstances that led to the ground collision and to implement measures aimed at preventing similar occurrences in the future.

Incidents

Air Peace A320 Suffers Engine Damage After Ground Vehicle Collision At Lagos Airport

July 16, 2026

Two Killed, One Injured In Hughes 500 Forestry Helicopter Crash In British Columbia SEO DES: A West Coast Helicopters Hughes 500 on a CFMG forestry mission crashed, killing the pilot and one worker, while the third occupant was seriously injured SOCIAL: A West Coast Helicopters Hughes 500 crashed during a CFMG forestry operation near Loughborough Inlet on British Columbia's Central Coast at around 6:15 a.m. on July 14, killing pilot Riley Browne and forestry worker Bobby Nowak, while a third occupant was seriously injured. The survivor was airlifted to hospital, and the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) has launched an investigation. The cause of the crash remains unknown, with authorities yet to release details on the helicopter's registration, weather conditions, or any possible mechanical issues. Image: West Coast Helicopters (Representational) Video: West Coast Helicopters (Representational) Loughborough Inlet, Canada: Two people were killed and another was seriously injured after a Hughes 500 helicopter operating on a forestry mission crashed in British Columbia's remote Central Coast on the morning of July 14, prompting a Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigation into the fatal accident. The helicopter, operated by West Coast Helicopters, went down at approximately 6:15 a.m. local time in Loughborough Inlet, near Knight Inlet, a rugged coastal area located about 80 kilometres north of Campbell River on Vancouver Island. The aircraft was conducting forestry operations in support of CFMG, a forestry company working in the area. According to West Coast Helicopters, three people were on board the aircraft: the pilot and two forestry personnel. The crash claimed the lives of the pilot and one member of the CFMG crew, while the third occupant survived and was rescued with serious injuries. The company has not disclosed what led to the helicopter coming down, and investigators have yet to determine the cause of the accident. British Columbia Emergency Health Services said the surviving occupant was airlifted from the remote crash site by air ambulance. The injured survivor was first transported to Canadian Forces Base Comox before being transferred to hospital, where officials said the person remained in serious but stable condition. West Coast Helicopters later identified its deceased pilot as Riley Browne, who had been flying with the company since 2021. In a statement shared on social media, the operator paid tribute to Browne, describing him as one of the company's most valued pilots. "He always had a smile on his face, eager to help. Riley started his flying career at WCH in 2021. He was one of the pillars of the company. We all loved him,” West Coast Helicopters said. The company also extended condolences to Browne's family, noting they are a well-known and close-knit family in the Port McNeill community. "Our thoughts, condolences and prayers go out to Riley's family... Rest in peace, Riley. You will not be forgotten,” the company added. Several media outlets and the helicopter operator reported that the second person killed was Bobby Nowak, a member of the CFMG forestry crew. However, as of the latest official updates, CFMG has not publicly confirmed the identity of its employee or released a statement regarding the fatality. The helicopter involved was identified by the operator as a Hughes 500, a light utility helicopter widely used in forestry, aerial survey, utility and remote-access operations because of its maneuverability and ability to operate in challenging terrain. Authorities have not yet released the aircraft's registration, serial number or year of manufacture. Likewise, officials have not disclosed whether the helicopter suffered a mechanical failure, encountered adverse weather or experienced any other operational issues before the crash. No eyewitness accounts describing the accident have been released publicly. Given the isolated nature of Loughborough Inlet, authorities have not indicated whether anyone on the ground observed the helicopter before it crashed. Investigators have also not disclosed whether distress calls were transmitted or whether flight tracking data captured the aircraft's final moments. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada has deployed a team of investigators to the crash site. According to the agency, investigators arrived at the location to document the wreckage, gather evidence and assess the occurrence before determining the scope of the investigation. The TSB has not released any preliminary findings, and no probable cause has been identified. Investigators are expected to examine the helicopter's maintenance records, operational history, weather conditions, pilot qualifications and any available technical evidence as part of the investigation. As with other TSB investigations, a final report could take several months before the agency determines the factors that led to the crash.

Aircraft Crashes

Two Killed, One Injured In Hughes 500 Forestry Helicopter Crash In British Columbia

July 16, 2026

London, United Kingdom: A technical fault on a British Airways aircraft after landing at London Gatwick Airport in the early hours of 15 July 2026 triggered significant disruption across southern England, forcing the temporary closure of the airport's single runway and leading at least nine inbound passenger flights to declare emergencies as fuel levels became critical following prolonged airborne holding. The disruption began shortly after midnight when a British Airways flight arriving from Palma de Mallorca, Spain, landed safely at Gatwick at approximately 00:12 BST. After touchdown, the aircraft experienced what the airline later described only as a technical fault, leaving it unable to immediately vacate the runway. Airport rescue and firefighting vehicles were dispatched as a precaution while the aircraft remained stationary on the runway. British Airways confirmed that the aircraft landed safely and that passengers were not placed in danger. "Our flight landed safely and customers disembarked normally following reports of a technical fault with the aircraft," a British Airways spokesperson said. Although the airline has acknowledged the technical issue, it has not disclosed the nature of the fault, the aircraft type, or the aircraft registration. Gatwick Airport has likewise not released further technical information regarding the incident. Because Gatwick operates with a single main runway, the disabled aircraft temporarily prevented arriving flights from landing while emergency responders assessed the situation and efforts were made to clear the runway. During the closure, aircraft already inbound to Gatwick were instructed to enter holding patterns while air traffic controllers worked to manage the growing congestion. As delays lengthened, at least nine inbound flights declared emergency or urgency conditions after fuel reserves fell to operationally critical levels. Flight tracking data cited by multiple media outlets indicated the declarations were associated with low-fuel situations resulting from the extended airborne holding rather than mechanical problems aboard the affected aircraft. Nine flights squawked the 7700 emergency transponder code, reportedly due to low fuel after extended holding. An additional five flights were also diverted to alternate airports. Of the 14 affected flights, five landed at London Luton Airport, four at London Stansted Airport, and one at London Heathrow Airport. The remaining diversions were outside London, with three flights landing at Birmingham Airport and one at Bristol Airport. Several of the affected flights had departed popular Mediterranean holiday destinations, including Lanzarote, Rhodes and Tenerife, before being forced to abandon their approaches to Gatwick. Some aircraft diverted to London Stansted Airport, while others were rerouted to London Luton Airport after determining they no longer had sufficient fuel to continue holding safely. One passenger travelling from Tenerife, whose flight diverted to Stansted instead of Gatwick, posted on social media that passengers remained on board awaiting instructions while airline staff determined the next steps. The traveller said the journey had become considerably longer than normal because of the diversion. The runway was eventually reopened after the British Airways aircraft was moved, allowing Gatwick to resume normal operations. However, the temporary closure caused knock-on delays affecting arrivals and departures during the overnight and early morning operating period. No injuries have been reported in connection with either the British Airways aircraft or any of the diverted flights. Authorities have not announced an investigation beyond the airline's technical inspection of the aircraft, and the exact cause of the fault remains unknown. As of the latest available updates, British Airways has not released additional operational details.

Incidents

BA Technical Fault Shuts Gatwick Runway, Nine Flights Declare Low-Fuel Emergencies

July 15, 2026

New Delhi, India: More than a year after the crash of Air India Flight AI171 near Ahmedabad claimed 260 lives, India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) has informed the Supreme Court that the investigation is entering its final stages, with the draft final investigation report expected to be ready in October 2026 after the completion of technical analysis and mandatory international consultations. In a detailed affidavit filed jointly by the Ministry of Civil Aviation and the AAIB, the Centre said the investigation activities are expected to be completed within approximately six weeks, subject to the resolution of a few remaining external dependencies. Once the analysis phase is concluded, investigators will prepare the draft final report before circulating it to participating States under international aviation rules. Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner operating from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick, crashed shortly after takeoff on June 12, 2025, striking a residential area near the airport. The accident killed 241 of the 242 people on board, along with 19 people on the ground, taking the total death toll to 260. It became one of India's deadliest aviation disasters in decades. Under ICAO Annex 13, accident investigations are intended solely to improve aviation safety and prevent future accidents, not to determine civil or criminal liability. The AAIB reiterated before the Supreme Court that it is India's sole statutory authority for investigating aircraft accidents and argued there is no legal basis for a court-monitored or parallel investigation, opposing petitions seeking an independent probe. The matter is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court on July 17. The affidavit states that 49 of the 66 mandatory investigative procedures applicable to a major international accident have already been completed. These include preservation of evidence, recovery and examination of the flight recorders, technical analysis of aircraft systems, participation of accredited international representatives and consultations with stakeholders. The remaining work primarily involves completing technical analysis and fulfilling international procedural requirements before the draft report can be finalized. The AAIB explained that the final report could not be completed within one year because of the investigation's complexity and the involvement of multiple international agencies. In accordance with ICAO rules, when an investigation cannot be completed within 12 months, the investigating authority must issue an interim statement describing the progress made. Accordingly, the AAIB released an interim statement around the first anniversary of the accident rather than a final report. Earlier in the investigation, the AAIB's preliminary findings revealed that both engine fuel control switches moved from the RUN position to CUT OFF within seconds of takeoff, causing both engines to lose thrust. Cockpit voice recordings captured one pilot asking why the switches had been moved, while the other responded that he had not done so. The switches were subsequently returned to the RUN position, but the aircraft was unable to regain sufficient thrust before crashing. Those findings answered some questions while leaving investigators with significant unresolved issues regarding how the switches moved and whether any mechanical, human or other factors were involved. According to the latest affidavit, investigators are still completing analysis of the remaining technical evidence before reaching final conclusions. Once the draft report is prepared, it must be circulated to the participating States under ICAO Annex 13, including the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) as the accredited representative for the State of Design and Manufacture of the Boeing 787. Those States are entitled to provide "significant and substantiated comments," a consultation process that the Centre said could take 30 to 60 days, depending on the complexity of the responses received. Only after those comments are considered can the AAIB finalize and publish its investigation report. The AAIB also defended maintaining strict confidentiality over sensitive investigative material, including cockpit voice recorder recordings and transcripts, witness statements, air traffic control communications, medical records and draft report contents. It said these protections are mandated by both Indian law and ICAO standards to preserve the integrity of safety investigations.

Investigation

AAIB Says Air India AI171 Crash Investigation To Reach Draft Report Stage In October

July 15, 2026

Incidents

Tokyo Court Sentences ANA Captain To Prison For Sexually Assaulting Flight Attendant

July 15, 2026

Harrietstown, United States: Three people were killed after a twin-engine Piper Aerostar crashed into a wooded area moments after departing Adirondack Regional Airport in northern New York late Monday night, marking the third aircraft accident reported in the Adirondacks within a week and prompting an investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). According to the New York State Police, the aircraft involved was a 1976 Piper Aerostar, a high-performance twin-engine airplane. Preliminary information indicates the aircraft departed Adirondack Regional Airport in Harrietstown at approximately 10:36 p.m. EDT on July 13, 2026. Shortly after becoming airborne, while climbing to an estimated altitude of only 100 feet above the ground, communication with the aircraft was lost. State Police said they were notified at approximately 11:15 p.m. of a downed aircraft near Hearf's Way and State Route 186, close to the airport. A multi-agency search operation involving state troopers, local emergency responders and other agencies was immediately launched to locate the missing airplane. Search crews later located the wreckage in a heavily wooded area between McMaster Road and State Route 186, northwest of Saranac Lake. Officials said the aircraft had been destroyed by the impact and a subsequent post-crash fire, leaving little of the airplane intact. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed that the aircraft was carrying three people, the pilot and two passengers and that all three died in the crash. Authorities have not yet released the identities of the victims pending family notification. Flight tracking data reviewed by several media outlets showed that the aircraft had arrived in the Saranac Lake area earlier on Monday before departing again later that evening from Adirondack Regional Airport. The airplane was registered to Jasper Air LLC, a company based in Toms River, New Jersey. The FAA said the aircraft crashed under unknown circumstances, and investigators have not yet identified what caused the loss of control or why communication ceased almost immediately after takeoff. At this stage, no evidence has been released indicating whether weather, mechanical issues, pilot actions or other factors contributed to the accident. Residents living near the crash site described hearing loud noises shortly before emergency crews arrived. Speaking to local television station WPTZ, resident Jodie Wells recalled the frightening moments after the impact. "We both flew out of bed and ran outside. I could hear some bangs and loud popping. It was scary. It was loud." She added, "We have been sad and out of sorts ever since." Another resident, William Cole, said the sounds initially resembled a thunderstorm. "It definitely sounded almost identical to thunder." According to local reports, a nearby home's doorbell camera reportedly captured the sound of the crash, although authorities have not indicated whether the footage will form part of the investigation. The crash also forced authorities to temporarily close a section of the Adirondack Rail Trail between McMaster Road and Route 186, restricting access for walkers and cyclists while investigators examined the accident scene and documented the wreckage. The closure remained in effect on Tuesday as investigative work continued. The National Transportation Safety Board has assumed responsibility for the investigation, with assistance from the FAA. The agency's investigation is expected to include a review of the aircraft's maintenance history, pilot qualifications, weather conditions, airport surveillance information, communications records and any available flight tracking data before determining the probable cause of the accident. No distress call or emergency declaration has been reported, and officials have not confirmed whether the aircraft experienced any mechanical malfunction before communication was lost. The investigation remains in its early stages, and authorities have cautioned that it may take months before a probable cause is established.

Aircraft Crashes

3 Killed After Piper Aerostar Crashes Shortly After Takeoff In New York Adirondacks

July 15, 2026

Qantas Named The World's Most Punctual Airline In A Strong Operational Turnaround SEO DES: Qantas topped major airlines in June with an 87.16% on-time rate across 22,617 flights, ahead of Avianca and IndiGo, with a 1.59% cancellation rate SOCIAL: Qantas has been named the world's most punctual major airline for June 2026 after achieving an 87.16% on-time arrival rate across 22,617 flights, according to OAG. The result marks the airline's best June punctuality since 2017 and a major turnaround from its 106th global ranking in 2023. Qantas topped Avianca and IndiGo among major carriers, while improved fleet modernization, operational planning and boarding efficiencies helped boost reliability. The airline also recorded a 1.59% cancellation rate, with strong domestic and international on-time performance. Sydney, Australia: Qantas has been ranked the world's most punctual major airline for June 2026, achieving its best operational reliability in nearly a decade and completing a remarkable turnaround after ranking among the world's poorest-performing major carriers just three years ago. The recognition comes from aviation data and analytics company OAG in its June 2026 On-Time Performance (OTP) report, which evaluates the punctuality of airlines worldwide. OAG defines an on-time flight as one that arrives within 15 minutes of its scheduled arrival time. The "major airline" category includes carriers operating more than 20,000 scheduled flights per month. According to OAG, Qantas recorded an 87.16% on-time arrival rate across 22,617 flights during June, edging out Colombia's Avianca, which posted 87.00%, while India's IndiGo ranked third with 86.60%. SAS Scandinavian Airlines and Pegasus Airlines completed the top five major carriers. Although Indonesia's Garuda Indonesia achieved an even higher on-time performance of approximately 97%, it was not included in the major airline category because it operates fewer than 20,000 monthly flights. The June result marks Qantas' strongest punctuality performance for the month since 2017 and caps a steady operational improvement throughout 2026. The airline had already ranked among the global top performers in previous months, finishing second in April and third in May, before taking the top spot in June. The achievement represents a significant recovery for Australia's flag carrier. In 2023, Qantas ranked 106th globally for punctuality following a period of operational disruption that affected many airlines after the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, the airline has focused heavily on improving operational reliability through fleet modernization, scheduling improvements, boarding efficiencies and network planning. Operational statistics released alongside the ranking showed that nearly 85% of Qantas' domestic departures left on schedule during June, while around 74% of international departures departed on time. Approximately 87% of international flights arrived within 30 minutes of their scheduled arrival times. The airline also recorded a relatively low 1.59% cancellation rate during the month. Despite topping the major airline category, Qantas ranked 23rd overall among the approximately 145 airlines included in OAG's broader June punctuality assessment, which also evaluates smaller regional carriers. Several smaller airlines recorded higher punctuality percentages but operated significantly fewer flights than the threshold required for inclusion in the major airline rankings. Qantas Domestic Chief Executive Officer Markus Svensson credited the result to the efforts of employees across the airline's operations. "This achievement reflects the dedication of our people across the business who work every day to deliver reliable services for our customers," Svensson said, adding that while the recognition is encouraging, the airline remains focused on further improving reliability and the overall customer experience. The airline's improved operational performance depends upon several initiatives implemented over the past year. These include the introduction of new Airbus A220-300 aircraft and the arrival of the Airbus A321XLR, both of which provide improved operational efficiency and reliability compared with older aircraft. Qantas has also streamlined boarding procedures, turnaround processes and operational planning while investing in network resilience to reduce delays. The latest OAG rankings place Qantas ahead of several major global competitors, reinforcing Australia's flag carrier's operational recovery at a time when airlines worldwide continue to face challenges including airspace restrictions, supply chain constraints and fleet availability issues. The June ranking also comes as Qantas continues to navigate broader industry pressures, including elevated fuel costs and geopolitical disruptions affecting global aviation. Nevertheless, the latest OAG data highlights a substantial improvement in the airline's operational performance and marks one of its strongest reliability results in recent years.

Airlines

Qantas Named The World’s Most Punctual Airline In A Strong Operational Turnaround

July 14, 2026

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Aviation Today Perspectives

Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility

July 14, 2026

Shannon, Ireland: United Airlines Flight UA509, a Boeing 767-400ER operating from Rome Fiumicino Airport (FCO), Italy, to Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR), New Jersey, was forced to divert to Shannon Airport (SNN), Ireland, on July 11 after the flight crew reported right-engine vibrations and an unusual odor in the cabin while crossing the North Atlantic. The aircraft was carrying 227 passengers and crew, and all landed safely with no injuries. The aircraft, registered N76065, departed Rome at 1:36 p.m. local time for the scheduled transatlantic service to Newark. Approximately three hours into the flight, while cruising at FL340 (34,000 feet) over the Atlantic and around 400 kilometres south of Ireland about 550 kilometres from Shannon Airport the pilots detected abnormal vibrations from the aircraft's right General Electric CF6 engine. The crew also reported a noticeable smell inside the cabin, prompting them to discontinue the oceanic crossing and request an immediate diversion to Shannon, one of the primary diversion airports for North Atlantic flights. According to reports, the affected engine remained operational but was reduced to idle thrust as a precaution. Air traffic controllers cleared the aircraft to divert, after which the crew descended from cruise altitude to facilitate the approach into Shannon. Because of the amount of fuel still onboard, the pilots advised they would be conducting an overweight landing, a procedure in which an aircraft lands above its normal maximum landing weight when an immediate landing is considered the safest course of action. At Shannon Airport, emergency procedures were activated before the aircraft's arrival. Airport authorities alerted their fire and rescue service after the crew requested emergency vehicles to be positioned alongside the runway. The Boeing 767 landed safely on Runway 06 at approximately 3:57 p.m. local time after more than four hours in the air. Fire and rescue vehicles escorted the aircraft along the runway before it stopped briefly on a taxiway, where firefighters carried out a visual inspection of the right engine. Given the overweight landing, emergency personnel also examined the aircraft's undercarriage and landing gear to ensure there was no overheating caused by the heavier-than-normal touchdown. Following the inspections, the aircraft taxied under its own power to the terminal while accompanied by emergency vehicles. United Airlines confirmed that the diversion was carried out "to address an issue with one engine." The airline said all 227 occupants disembarked safely without injury. Passengers were provided with hotel accommodation, compensation where applicable, and were rebooked on the next available flights to their destinations. Flight tracking data showed the aircraft remained on the ground in Shannon following the incident while maintenance personnel conducted inspections to determine the cause of the reported engine vibrations and cabin odor. The remainder of Flight UA509 to Newark was cancelled. As of the latest available updates, aviation authorities had not released findings on the cause of the technical issue, and the aircraft continued to undergo maintenance evaluation before returning to service.

Incidents

United Boeing 767 Diverts To Shannon After Engine Vibrations On Rome-Newark Flight

July 14, 2026

New Delhi, India: The Supreme Court of India has directed the Central Government to place before it, within two weeks, the draft rules framed under the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024, as it continues hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking stronger regulation of India's civil aviation sector, including safeguards against arbitrary airfare hikes and increasing ancillary charges imposed by airlines. The court has asked the Centre to submit the proposed rules in a sealed cover, even if they have not yet been laid before Parliament, and has listed the matter for further hearing on August 3, 2026. The matter is being heard by a Bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta, which has repeatedly expressed concern over the lack of regulatory oversight governing airfare pricing and passenger charges. During earlier hearings, the Bench observed that passengers flying on the same route on the same day often pay vastly different fares despite receiving the same service, raising questions over the transparency and fairness of airline pricing practices. The judges also highlighted the sharp surge in ticket prices during festivals, holidays and emergencies, describing such increases as a matter requiring regulatory attention. The PIL has been filed by social activist S. Laxminarayanan, represented by senior advocate Ravindra Srivastava, seeking comprehensive reforms to strengthen passenger rights. The petition calls for the establishment of an independent civil aviation regulator with powers to oversee airfare pricing, ensure transparency in dynamic pricing mechanisms, regulate ancillary charges and provide effective consumer protection across the aviation sector. According to the petitioner, while rules already existed under the Aircraft Act, 1937, inadequate implementation and enforcement allowed airlines to continue imposing arbitrary pricing and additional passenger fees. Apart from challenging unpredictable airfare fluctuations, the petition also targets airline baggage policies. It argues that many airlines have gradually reduced the complimentary checked baggage allowance for economy-class passengers from 25 kilograms to 15 kilograms, while simultaneously limiting travellers to a single checked bag. The plea contends that these changes effectively compel passengers to pay additional baggage fees without any corresponding reduction in ticket prices, amounting to an exploitative practice that has become a significant source of ancillary revenue for airlines. It further alleges that passengers are increasingly being charged separately for services that were previously included in the airfare. The Centre informed the Supreme Court that the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam, 2024 came into force in January 2025 and that the corresponding rules are presently under consultation and translation before being formally placed before Parliament. While acknowledging the concerns raised in the petition, the government stated that the Ministry of Civil Aviation is actively examining the issues relating to airfare regulation and passenger protection under the new legal framework. The court, however, directed the government to place the draft rules before it within two weeks so they can be examined during the ongoing proceedings. The litigation has been pending before the apex court for several months. On November 17, 2025, the Supreme Court sought responses from the Centre and other stakeholders after admitting the petition. During a hearing on January 19, 2026, the Bench observed that it would examine the issue of "unpredictable fluctuations" in airfares, particularly the steep increases witnessed during festive seasons. Subsequently, on May 15, 2026, the court remarked that there should be some rationalisation of airfares and questioned why airlines operating on the same route charge substantially different fares on the same day. At that stage, it also asked the Centre to explore measures that could provide relief to air travellers. The latest order marks another significant step in the Supreme Court's scrutiny of airline pricing practices and passenger rights. The court is expected to examine the finalized draft rules during the next hearing on August 3, when it will consider whether the new regulatory framework under the Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam adequately addresses concerns surrounding airfare transparency, ancillary charges, baggage policies and consumer protection in India's rapidly expanding aviation sector.

India

India’s Supreme Court Seeks Draft Rules Amid Scrutiny Of Airline Airfare Practices

July 14, 2026

SACAA Preliminary Report Details Cessna 172 Cockpit Fire And Student Pilot's Escape SEO DES: An Aviation Junction Flying School student pilot was seriously injured after a Cessna 172M caught fire during a go-around near Secunda on May 27, 2026 SOCIAL: The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) has released its preliminary report into the 27 May 2026 crash of a Cessna 172M (ZS-JBO) near Secunda, Mpumalanga, involving a solo student pilot of Aviation Junction Flying School. During a go-around after encountering windshear, the aircraft's flaps failed to retract, the airspeed decayed, the stall warning activated, and a cockpit fire broke out. The pilot conducted a forced landing, burned through a jammed seatbelt using the cockpit fire, and jumped from the aircraft moments before impact, surviving with serious burn and facial injuries. The aircraft was destroyed by fire. Investigators found the aircraft was airworthy before the flight, but the fire severely damaged the wreckage, preventing determination of the exact impact sequence. The AIID said the investigation remains ongoing, and no safety recommendations have been issued at this stage. Secunda, South Africa: The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) has released its preliminary accident report into the crash of a Cessna 172M (registration ZS-JBO) that occurred on 27 May 2026 near Graceland Golf Course, Secunda, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. The accident involved one person on board, a 20-year-old Saudi Arabian student pilot conducting a solo training flight. The student survived with serious injuries, while the aircraft was destroyed by an in-flight fire following an attempted go-around. The aircraft, operated by Aviation Junction Flying School under Part 141 training operations, departed Secunda Aerodrome (FASC) at approximately 0930 UTC for a solo training sortie in the general flying area. The flight was conducted during daylight under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Before departure, the student pilot completed the required pre-flight inspections and refuelled the aircraft with 60 litres of Avgas. No defects had been recorded in the aircraft's flight folio before the flight. According to the preliminary investigation, the accident sequence began when the student returned to Runway 29 at Secunda. During the final approach, with the wing flaps selected to 30 degrees, the aircraft encountered windshear, prompting the pilot to initiate a go-around. During the manoeuvre, the pilot attempted to retract the flaps, but they failed to retract. The aircraft's indicated airspeed then decreased, activating the stall warning. Although the student managed to recover from the developing stall, he soon noticed smoke inside the cockpit, followed almost immediately by fire. Realising the aircraft could no longer continue safely, the student pilot selected a field near Graceland Golf Course for a forced landing. While flying over the golf course perimeter fence, he attempted to unbuckle his seatbelt but found it jammed. In the report investigators state that the pilot used the cockpit fire to burn through the seatbelt material, allowing him to free himself. He then opened the aircraft's left-side door and jumped from the aircraft approximately six to eight feet above the ground, moments before it crashed. The pilot sustained serious facial injuries from the jump and burn injuries to both arms and his right leg. Golf course workers who witnessed the accident reported hearing the aircraft approach followed seconds later by a loud bang. They observed grey-to-black smoke rising from the wreckage and found the aircraft engulfed in flames upon reaching the site. The workers rescued the injured pilot by moving him away from the advancing grass fire before emergency services arrived. He was initially treated at a hospital in Secunda before being transferred to a specialist hospital in Gauteng for facial surgery. The accident occurred at approximately 1030 UTC, around 2.33 kilometres from Secunda Aerodrome, at an elevation of 5,195 feet. There were no fatalities, no passengers, and no injuries to people on the ground. The aircraft was destroyed by the post-impact fire. Investigators noted that the aircraft's nose landing gear and left main landing gear had separated from the fuselage, while both propeller blades were found bent backwards. However, because the fire destroyed much of the aircraft, investigators stated it is not yet possible to determine precisely how the aircraft impacted the ground. The cockpit and cabin were almost completely consumed by fire, making identification of several components difficult. The pilot held a valid Student Pilot Licence (SPL) and had accumulated 74.2 total flying hours, including only 4.1 hours on the Cessna 172M, having transitioned from a Tecnam Echo earlier in 2026. His Class 2 aviation medical certificate was valid until November 2028 with no restrictions. The aircraft, a 1975-built Cessna 172M, had accumulated 22,791.5 airframe hours. It held a valid Certificate of Airworthiness and Certificate of Release to Service, with its latest maintenance inspection completed only weeks before the accident. The report also notes the aircraft had previously been involved in four earlier occurrences between 2003 and 2022, including a forced landing following engine power loss, a wind-related ground damage event, a hard landing, and a nose-wheel collapse after a bounced landing. Weather conditions recorded at nearby Ermelo Aerodrome around the time of the accident indicated 210-degree winds at 5 knots, 10 kilometres visibility, 20°C temperature, no cloud, and a QNH of 1028 hPa. The report stresses that these findings do not assign blame or liability, and that the investigation remains ongoing. At this stage, no safety recommendations have been issued.

Investigation

SACAA Preliminary Report Details Cessna 172 Cockpit Fire And Student Pilot’s Escape

July 14, 2026

Gaming, Austria: The aircraft came down in a difficult-to-access area near Gaming, prompting a large-scale emergency response involving the police, fire brigade, ambulance services and two rescue helicopters. Rescue teams had to navigate rugged terrain to reach the wreckage. The single-engine aircraft The Piper PA-28 took off from Seitenstetten Airport, located about 40 kilometers from the scene of the accident. Shortly before noon, the machine lost altitude and fell into a densely forested and rocky area in the municipality of Gaming, near Mount Yocher (nearly 1900 meters above sea level). Authorities confirmed that all four occupants were on board when the aircraft crashed. The 47-year-old pilot and a woman of the same age died at the scene. A 15-year-old girl and a 41-year-old man were rescued from the wreckage with serious injuries. They were pulled from the rocky terrain with ropes and transported by helicopter to an ambulance. One of the injured was airlifted by rescue helicopter to a hospital in Linz, while emergency responders transported the second survivor for medical treatment. Officials have not released further updates on their conditions. According to preliminary, unconfirmed eyewitness accounts, the aircraft's engine emitted an unusual noise before the crash, suggesting a possible technical malfunction. The prosecutor's office has ordered a routine autopsy on the pilot as part of the investigation, while the wreckage is expected to be recovered from the mountainside using a specialized helicopter. Investigators have begun examining the wreckage, but the cause of the crash remains unknown. Gaming, a rural municipality in Lower Austria located near the Ötscher mountain region, is known for its heavily wooded and mountainous terrain, which complicated rescue efforts following the crash. The investigation is expected to continue as Austrian authorities work to identify the victims and establish the circumstances surrounding the accident.

Aircraft Crashes

Two Killed, Two Seriously Injured After Light Aircraft Crashes In Lower Austria

July 13, 2026

« Previous Next »

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Email

Recent News

Airbus Completes Longest-Ever A350-1000 ULR Development Flight Ahead Of Project Sunrise SEO DES: Airbus' A350-1000 ULR test aircraft completed a record 24-hour, 24-minute nonstop development flight covering 12,460 nautical miles from Melbourne to Toulouse SOCIAL: Airbus’ A350-1000 ULR test aircraft MSN707 completed a record 24-hour-24-minute nonstop development flight from Melbourne, Australia, to Toulouse, France, covering 12,460 nautical miles. The flight was part of Airbus’ two-part development programme supporting Qantas’ Project Sunrise ultra-long-haul operations. The test evaluated the aircraft’s fuel-management systems, rear centre tank, cabin comfort, air-conditioning and new twin Flight Crew Rest Compartment. Pilots also followed specialised fatigue-management procedures, while Qantas pilots gained experience flying the A350-1000 ULR variant. The flight involved Airbus and Qantas pilots and flight-test engineers, with the aircraft following a route across the Pacific, North America and the Atlantic. The mission is expected to help validate the A350-1000 ULR for future nonstop commercial services connecting Australia with Europe and North America. Toulouse, France: Airbus has completed the longest flight ever flown by its A350-1000 ULR flight-test aircraft MSN707, with the specially instrumented MSN707 flying nonstop from Melbourne, Australia, to Toulouse, France, for 24 hours and 24 minutes. The aircraft covered 12,460 nautical miles (23,075 km or 14,338 miles) before landing in Toulouse on the morning of July 28, 2026. The flight was part of a two-part development flight-test programme. On July 23, MSN707 departed Toulouse on its longest point-to-point flight to Melbourne. A few days later, the aircraft began its return journey to Toulouse, carrying two Qantas guest pilots alongside the Airbus test crew. Airbus said the return flight was technically classified as a development test rather than a certification flight. The programme is designed to demonstrate the A350-1000ULR's ability to complete a 23-hour block-time mission. Block time runs from the release of the parking brake at departure until the aircraft reaches its arrival stand and is intended to provide sufficient operational margin around the planned 21-hour-40-minute flight time for Qantas' forthcoming Project Sunrise routes, including time for holding, diversion and taxiing. The aircraft is powered by two Rolls-Royce Trent XWB-97 engines and features an additional rear centre tank (RCT) with a 20,900-litre fuel capacity. The tank is designed to support ultra-long-range operations covering almost 10,000 nautical miles. During the flight, Airbus used the fully fueled RCT to validate remaining test points and assess fuel-management systems, while also evaluating cabin comfort and air-conditioning performance. Airbus Test Pilot Xavier Pepin, who served as captain on the record-setting return leg, said the first, approximately 20-hour leg was used to stabilise various cabin air-temperature settings for accurate measurements. The return flight then allowed the team to address backup test points that could not be completed during the first leg. The flight also evaluated the A350-1000ULR's new twin Flight Crew Rest Compartment. The specially designed facility has two separate sections with individual entrances, allowing pilots to access their respective rest areas without disturbing one another during airline operations. However, because the compartments were occupied by ventilation-measurement equipment during the test, the crew instead used the aircraft's eight-berth rear cabin-crew rest compartment for sleeping. The return flight from Melbourne followed a route across the Pacific toward Los Angeles, over the United States and Canada, and across the Atlantic south of Greenland before passing over the UK and continuing to southern France. Airbus selected a more northerly Atlantic routing to avoid potential air-traffic-control issues that could arise if published airline tracks were not updated before departure, potentially resulting in mismatched flight plans. Fatigue management was another key element of the ultra-long-range test. Airbus said pilots worked four-hour shifts but rotated every two hours, creating a two-hour overlap between the incoming and outgoing pilots. The arrangement was intended to support detailed handovers and maintain situational awareness throughout the 20- to 23-hour missions. On the return flight, at least one Airbus test pilot remained in a pilot seat whenever a Qantas pilot occupied the other seat, as Airbus retained operational responsibility for the mission. The schedule also allowed the Qantas pilots to take the controls at designated times. Both were already qualified on the A350 but were experiencing the A350-1000 ULR variant for the first time. The return flight was commanded by Airbus Test Pilot Xavier Pepin. Two Qantas pilots, Captain Andrew Coull and Captain David Summergreene, joined the mission, while one Airbus pilot from the outbound crew disembarked. Five pilots were therefore aboard for the return leg: three Airbus pilots and the two Qantas pilots. The two Test-Flight Engineers, Laurent Rossignol and Nicolas Granier, and three Flight-Test Engineers, Tuan Do, Alexia Plummet and Jaime Angoloti, remained on board for the return flight. The outbound leg had been led by Airbus Test Pilot Vincent Sibelle, who served as captain and was responsible for the overall mission organisation. The other Airbus pilots were Xavier Pepin, Josef Bayoud and Chetan Takalkar. The two Test-Flight Engineers monitored aircraft systems from the cockpit, while the three Flight-Test Engineers worked from stations in the main cabin, coordinating tests including cabin-comfort and fuel monitoring. The MSN707 test aircraft first flew on June 2, 2026, and is equipped with specialised instrumentation for the development programme. The latest flight is intended to help validate the aircraft's capabilities and systems ahead of its planned use for Qantas' Project Sunrise ultra-long-haul operations. The flight also attracted significant public attention. Reuters reported that more than 3.6 million people tracked the aircraft online, making it the second-most-followed flight ever on Flightradar24. The test demonstrated the potential of the A350-1000 ULR to support nonstop commercial services linking Australia's east coast with destinations in Europe and North America. The Melbourne-Toulouse development flight marks a major milestone in the testing of an aircraft designed to make some of the world's longest commercial passenger flights possible. Airbus' latest test programme is focused not only on endurance and fuel management but also on cabin conditions, crew-rest arrangements and operational procedures required for missions lasting more than 20 hours.

Airbus Completes Longest-Ever A350-1000 ULR Development Flight Ahead Of Project Sunrise

July 29, 2026

American Eagle Flight 5816 Diverts To Norfolk After Reported Smoke In Cabin

July 29, 2026

Washington, United States: The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on July 27, 2026, proposed inspections of passenger seat assemblies on 453 U.S.-registered Boeing 737 MAX aircraft after receiving a report that some seats may not have been correctly installed in their floor tracks. The proposed Airworthiness Directive (AD) applies to certain Boeing 737-8, 737-9 and 737-8200 aircraft. According to the FAA, the issue involves track-mounted passenger seat assemblies whose aft fitting shear plungers may not have been correctly lowered and engaged in the seat tracks. The regulator said an incorrectly installed seat assembly could disengage from the seat tracks under increased loads, during turbulence or in an emergency landing. The FAA warned that, if the condition is not corrected, it could result in injuries to passengers or crew during an emergency landing or block an aisle and slow an evacuation. The FAA said the proposed directive would require operators to conduct a detailed inspection of the seat-track fittings on each left- and right-side track-mounted passenger seat assembly to verify that they are correctly installed. Any required corrective action would also have to be carried out. "There could be up to 69 track-mounted passenger seat assemblies on each 737 MAX plane," according to details cited in the FAA proposal. The agency estimates one work-hour for the required action per affected seat assembly, with the inspection and corrective work expected to cost operators about $85 per seat assembly. The FAA estimates the total inspection cost for U.S. operators at up to $2.66 million, while Boeing has indicated that some or all costs associated with the proposed AD may be covered under warranty. The FAA's proposed rule was prompted by Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-25-1927 RB, dated December 10, 2025. Boeing had previously provided guidance to operators on the issue, and the FAA is now proposing to make the required inspections and corrective actions mandatory. The agency said it had determined that the unsafe condition identified in the report is likely to exist or develop on other aircraft of the same type design. The proposal does not currently indicate that all 453 aircraft have incorrectly installed seats. Instead, the FAA is proposing inspections to determine whether the seat assemblies are correctly secured and to require corrective action where necessary. The FAA has set September 10, 2026, as the deadline for public comments on the proposed directive. The agency will consider comments before deciding whether to issue a final Airworthiness Directive. The FAA proposal itself does not identify a specific accident or injury linked to the seat installation issue. Rather, the regulator is acting on the potential safety risk posed by a seat assembly becoming disengaged from its track during high-load conditions. The development comes as the FAA continues heightened oversight of Boeing's production and quality-control processes. On July 17, 2026, the agency announced that Boeing would be allowed to resume issuing airworthiness certificates for all newly produced 737 MAX and 787 aircraft from July 20, following months of FAA review of production quality data. The latest seat-track proposal is therefore another regulatory action focused on ensuring that aircraft meet approved design and safety requirements, but it does not amount to a grounding order or an immediate suspension of 737 MAX operations.

FAA Proposes Seat Inspections For 453 Boeing 737 MAX Jets Over Installation Issue

July 28, 2026

SWISS Flight Airbus A330 Diverted To Bangor After Smoke Reported Aboard The Aircraft SEO DES: Smoke was detected in the forward section of Business Class; FAA preliminarily reported a cockpit fire, but the smoke source remains unconfirmed SOCIAL: SWISS Flight LX16 from Zurich to New York JFK diverted to Bangor International Airport in Maine on July 27 after smoke was reportedly detected aboard. The Airbus A330 was carrying 208 people, and all passengers and crew landed safely. SWISS said the smoke was of unknown origin in the forward Business Class section, while the FAA preliminarily said the crew reported a cockpit fire. The aircraft landed on Runway 33, where emergency responders inspected it but found no signs of fire or excessive heat. The runway was temporarily closed for over 30 minutes, causing some flight delays. SWISS said the aircraft would undergo a thorough inspection and that it would not speculate on the cause until the checks were completed, while arrangements were made for passengers to continue their journey to New York. Bangor, United States: A Swiss International AirLines Airbus A330 operating Flight LX16 from Zurich to New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport made an emergency diversion to Bangor International Airport in Maine on Monday, July 27, after smoke was reported aboard the aircraft. The flight, carrying 208 passengers and crew, landed safely in Bangor at around noon local time. The aircraft was an Airbus A330, and emergency crews were placed on standby before it arrived at the airport. According to Swiss International Air Lines, the diversion was prompted by smoke of unknown origin detected in the forward section of the Business Class cabin. The airline said its pilots decided to land without delay and declare an emergency, allowing air traffic control to give the aircraft priority to land. The situation was also described differently in preliminary information released by the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA said the flight crew had reported a cockpit fire before landing. The agency cautioned that the information was preliminary and subject to change. The airline, meanwhile, said the exact source of the smoke had not been identified. The aircraft was cruising at about 32,000 feet and was roughly 100 nautical miles southeast of Bangor when the crew diverted toward the airport. The crew reportedly initially reported smoke of unknown origin before subsequently telling air traffic control that there was an active fire in the cockpit that they were unable to extinguish. The pilots reportedly opened the cockpit door to allow smoke to escape, after which the smoke situation changed and was also noticed in the passenger cabin. The crew proceeded with the emergency diversion and landed on Runway 33 at Bangor International Airport. After landing, the aircraft stopped and shut down its engines while emergency responders assessed the situation. Firefighters entered the aircraft and inspected the interior, including equipment intended to detect heat. No signs of fire or excessive heat were found, and the source of the smoke remained undetermined. Passengers told local media that they noticed an electrical-type smell during the flight. One passenger said the smell appeared to be coming from the area of a seat, although this has not been established as the cause of the incident. Passengers also reported that the oxygen masks did not deploy and that they were not required to evacuate the aircraft on the runway. All 208 people aboard were reported safe, and no injuries were reported. The aircraft was subsequently inspected, while SWISS worked with authorities and Bangor International Airport to arrange onward travel for passengers to New York. The emergency landing temporarily closed the runway at Bangor International Airport for a little over 30 minutes, causing delays to other flights. The runway was reopened at about 12:30 p.m., according to an airport spokesperson. SWISS spokesperson Michael Pelzer said the airline understood that such a diversion could be unsettling for passengers and said teams in Switzerland and the United States were working to arrange onward travel. The airline also said the aircraft would undergo a thorough inspection by its experts and that it would not speculate on the cause of the smoke until the investigation and inspection were complete. The FAA said it would investigate the incident. The aircraft's emergency diversion was resolved without further incident, with all passengers and crew safely on the ground in Bangor.

SWISS Flight Airbus A330 Diverted To Bangor After Smoke Reported Aboard The Aircraft

July 28, 2026

US Army UH-72 Lakota Crashes In Alabama During Training Flight, Three Survive SEO DES: A UH-72 carrying an instructor and 2 student pilots reportedly lost power and crashed during a training flight with the cause under investigation SOCIAL: A U.S. Army UH-72 Lakota helicopter was involved in an aviation mishap Monday afternoon, July 27, during routine flight training in a remote area near Opp, Alabama. Three people were aboard, including one instructor pilot and two student pilots. All three occupants survived and were taken to a Dothan-area hospital for medical evaluation. Their identities and injury details have not been publicly released, but all were reported to be in stable condition. The Army has not disclosed how the helicopter came down, the extent of aircraft damage, or the cause of the mishap. The incident remains under investigation, with no fatalities reported. Opp, United States: A US Army UH-72 Lakota helicopter was involved in an aviation mishap Monday afternoon, July 27, it crashed in a privately owned field on Cool Springs Road near the Opp Bypass in Covington County, with all three people aboard reported in stable condition, according to Fort Rucker officials. The helicopter was operating in a remote training area near Opp when the incident occurred. Officials say the crew was conducting routine flight training. Covington County Sheriff Blake Turman says it appears that the helicopter lost power and crashed. Fort Rucker officials confirmed that a single UH-72 Lakota was involved in the aviation mishap and that three people were aboard the aircraft. According to information released by Fort Rucker officials, all three occupants survived the incident and were reported to be in stable condition. Occupants are identified as an instructor pilot and two student pilots and they were taken to a Dothan-area hospital for medical evaluation and treatment. The identities of the three occupants have not been publicly released in the official information currently available. Officials have also not disclosed the extent of their injuries. The circumstances that led to the helicopter mishap, including how the aircraft came down and whether it sustained significant damage, have not been publicly detailed. Fort Rucker officials have not announced a cause, and the incident remains under investigation. The Army has described the event as an "aviation mishap." No fatalities have been reported. The UH-72 Lakota is operated by the US Army for missions including training and support operations. The helicopter involved in Monday's incident was being used during a routine training flight. As of the latest available official information, the three people aboard remained in stable condition, while the cause of the mishap was under investigation.

US Army UH-72 Lakota Crashes In Alabama During Training Flight, Three Survive

July 28, 2026

Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 6

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 5

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility - PART 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 4

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Citywide Networks Must Be Designed Around Real Travel Patterns

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 3

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility Part 2- Aviation Today Perspectives

From Demonstrations to Networks: The Real Test of Advanced Air Mobility – Part 2

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube