Skip to content

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Search

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Contact Us

Search

airline crash news

Wuzhou, China: The crash of China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 crash continues to raise critical questions more than four years after the disaster, as newly surfaced U.S. investigative data points toward deliberate cockpit actions while Chinese authorities maintain silence, citing national security concerns. On March 21, 2022, a Boeing 737-800 operated by China Eastern Airlines plunged from cruising altitude into mountainous terrain in Guangxi, killing all 132 passengers and crew on board. The aircraft, en route from Kunming to Guangzhou, entered a near-vertical descent from approximately 29,000 feet, leaving investigators initially baffled due to the absence of distress calls or clear external triggers. Early findings released by the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) ruled out conventional causes such as mechanical failure, severe weather, or hazardous cargo. The aircraft was deemed airworthy, the crew qualified and medically fit, and no evidence of explosives was found. Flight data and cockpit voice recorders were recovered and analyzed with assistance from international agencies, including the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), yet interim reports issued between 2022 and 2024 stopped short of identifying a definitive cause, describing the event as “very complicated and very rare.” Attention began to shift toward possible human involvement after early assessments indicated that control inputs from the cockpit forced the aircraft into its steep descent. However, no official conclusion was publicly endorsed, and the investigation appeared to stall as updates from Chinese authorities became increasingly limited. A significant breakthrough emerged in 2026 following the release of previously undisclosed materials through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the NTSB. According to flight data recorder analysis, both engine fuel control switches were moved to the “cutoff” position approximately 23 seconds before the recording ceased. This action resulted in an immediate loss of engine thrust, followed by autopilot disengagement and aggressive forward control inputs that drove the aircraft into a rapid descent. The loss of electrical power shortly afterward caused the recorder to stop, leaving the final moments of the flight undocumented. The cockpit voice recorder, which continued operating briefly on backup power, was successfully recovered and analyzed. However, its contents have not been made public. The NTSB confirmed that it does not retain copies of the audio, and access remains under the control of Chinese authorities, making it a crucial yet unavailable piece of evidence in determining the sequence of events inside the cockpit. While the available data suggests that the shutdown of both engines was unlikely to be accidental and is consistent with deliberate manual input, investigators have not identified which pilot may have acted or under what circumstances. The data also does not establish motive, leaving open possibilities ranging from intentional action to incapacitation or other in-flight scenarios. Reports speculating about a possible struggle in the cockpit have surfaced in some media outlets but remain unverified and are not part of any confirmed investigative findings. Despite the emergence of these critical details, the CAAC has yet to release a final accident report, well beyond the timeline prescribed under international aviation norms. Officials have indicated that disclosing further information could endanger national security or disrupt social stability, an explanation that has drawn concern from global aviation bodies and safety experts. Under standard practices, accident investigations are expected to produce a final report within one year to ensure that safety lessons are shared across the industry. The continued lack of transparency has left several fundamental questions unanswered. Without access to the cockpit voice recordings and a comprehensive official report, the exact cause of the crash remains unresolved.

NTSB Data Suggests Possible Deliberate Engine Shutdown In MU5735 Crash That Killed 132

Aviation Today News Desk / May 6, 2026

Wuzhou, China: The crash of China Eastern Airlines Flight 5735 crash continues to raise critical questions more than four years […]

Gujarat, India: A tragic aviation disaster unfolded on the morning of June 12, 2025, when Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, crashed just seconds after takeoff from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad. The flight, which was en route to London Gatwick, carried 242 people, including 230 passengers and 12 crew members. According to a statement released by the Ministry of Civil Aviation, 241 individuals have been confirmed dead, making it one of the deadliest air crashes in Indian civil aviation history. The only confirmed survivor is Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British National who was seated in the rear cabin section. He is currently receiving treatment at Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, and is said to be in stable condition. Authorities confirmed that at least five people on the ground, all believed to be medical students and staff at the nearby BJ Medical College, also lost their lives when the aircraft struck parts of the college complex, including a hostel and a mess building. Airline and Government Response Air India, now a part of the Tata Group, confirmed the crash and has extended its condolences. CEO Campbell Wilson addressed the media later that day, stating that "no speculation will be entertained at this stage" and affirming full cooperation with investigators. He also announced that all affected families will be supported financially and medically, as per international and domestic aviation laws. The airline is reportedly working closely with the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and international partners including the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was on a visit to Gujarat at the time, visited the crash site in the afternoon and later met with the survivor and local rescue personnel. In a brief statement, he called the crash “a national tragedy” and assured the public that “no detail will be overlooked” in the forthcoming investigation. Initial Findings and Speculative Theories Preliminary data retrieved from ADS-B trackers indicates that the aircraft reached a maximum altitude of just 625 feet before it began a sharp descent. A brief MAYDAY call was made by the pilots shortly before radio contact was lost. The aircraft came down within 49 seconds of liftoff, indicating what experts describe as a catastrophic systems or performance failure. Authorities have since recovered the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) from the crash site. Both are being sent to a secure laboratory for analysis under supervision from Indian and international safety investigators. A formal report from the DGCA is expected to be released only after all data is decoded and verified. While the official cause remains unknown, some early speculation has emerged within aviation circles. Multiple former pilots and aircraft engineers, including Alastair Rosenschein and Prof. Ahmed Busnaina, suggest that video footage and eyewitness reports hint at a potential flap or slat misconfiguration. In several verified clips, the aircraft's landing gear remained extended far longer than standard procedures typically allow, and the aircraft appeared to struggle with lift. This has led to the theory that either the flaps failed to deploy correctly or were improperly set for takeoff, both of which can severely impair the 787’s ability to generate adequate lift at low speeds. Others have pointed to the possibility of an engine thrust asymmetry or compressor stall, though this remains speculative. A source close to GE Aerospace, the engine manufacturer for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, confirmed they have dispatched technical experts to support the investigation but declined to offer comments pending formal findings. Safety Record, Financial Impact and Fleet Review The DGCA has not ruled out any cause, including potential pilot error, though Air India confirmed both pilots had over 8,000 hours of combined flying experience and were recently re-certified on the 787 platform. The aircraft itself had been inducted in 2017 and reportedly underwent scheduled maintenance just 18 days prior to the incident. No outstanding technical complaints were reported in the days leading up to the crash. This marks the first-ever fatal crash of a Boeing 787 aircraft, a type that has logged over a million flight hours globally since its entry into service in 2011. The accident has already triggered scrutiny of Air India’s operational safety standards and the DGCA’s oversight mechanisms. According to industry sources cited by The Guardian, a temporary suspension or audit of all 787 operations in India is under “active consideration,” although no formal announcement has been made. Financially, the accident could become one of the costliest single-aircraft losses in history, with combined insurance claims expected to exceed $1.5 billion, factoring in hull loss, liability coverage, and third-party claims. Ongoing Investigation and Support Efforts As of now, rescue and recovery operations at the site have concluded, and forensic identification of the deceased is ongoing. Compensation procedures are being initiated under the Montreal Convention, and special assistance desks have been established by Air India at both Ahmedabad and London Gatwick. A conclusive statement on the cause of the crash will likely take weeks, if not months. Until then, the focus remains on supporting affected families, securing flight operations, and ensuring a transparent and data-driven investigation.

Airplane Crashes

241 Confirmed Dead in Fatal Air India Flight Crash, British National Only Survivor

Aviation Today News Desk / June 13, 2025

Picture Credits: X Gujarat, India: A tragic aviation disaster unfolded on the morning of June 12, 2025, when Air India

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

© Copyright 2026 Aviation Today. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

Search

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube