Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

About Us
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

WhatsApp Channel

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Subscribe Now

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
About Us

News

Civil Aviation

Pilot Training

Flight School Analysis

Aviation Jobs

Training

Services

About Us

Subscribe Now

Aviation Today News Desk

New Delhi, India: Flight operations at Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGI) in New Delhi were severely disrupted on Monday as dense winter fog and hazardous air pollution levels brought visibility to near‑zero and forced widespread cancellations and delays across the aviation network. According to airport authorities and airline sources, at least 228 flights were cancelled at Delhi alone on Monday due to extremely low visibility, with five additional flights diverted to alternate airports as a safety precaution. Cancellation figures include both departures and arrivals, with reports noting 131 departures and 97 arrivals affected. Across northern India, analysts estimate that up to 300 flights were cancelled as the disruption spread to other airports in the region and hundreds more were delayed, compounding travel challenges for passengers ahead of the peak winter travel period. The India Meteorological Department (IMD) issued an orange alert for dense fog across the National Capital Region (NCR) and adjoining states, warning that visibility could remain significantly reduced throughout the day. Early‑morning visibility levels reportedly plunged to just a few metres at several monitoring points in Delhi, complicating both air and ground travel. The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) reported air quality readings in the capital well into the ‘Severe’ category, with some areas registering Air Quality Index (AQI) values above 450. The hazardous smog contributed to the persistence of fog conditions and posed additional health risks to commuters and airport personnel. Major carriers including IndiGo, Air India, SpiceJet and others issued travel advisories urging passengers to verify flight statuses before traveling to the airport. Some airlines also provided options for refunds or rebooking for affected travellers. IndiGo reportedly cancelled more than 100 flights from Delhi as part of the disruption, reflecting the scale of impact on airline schedules. International carriers were also affected, Etihad Airways confirmed that its Delhi–Abu Dhabi service experienced delays due to low visibility conditions. The prolonged low‑visibility conditions led to significant passenger inconvenience, with travellers facing long waits, flight rescheduling, and uncertainty over departure times. Ground transport in and around Delhi was also affected, with fog contributing to slower vehicular movement and hazards on major road corridors. Local advisories recommended travellers allow extra time for airport transfers, check updated flight information frequently, and make contingency plans due to the ongoing weather challenges. Meteorologists indicate that dense fog in northern India could persist into Tuesday and possibly Wednesday, raising the prospect of continued disruptions until visibility improves. Aviation authorities are working to coordinate operations under low‑visibility procedures, but safety considerations remain the primary determinant of flight movements.

Dense Fog And Smog Disrupt Delhi Airport Operations, 200+ Flights Cancelled And Delayed

December 16, 2025

Mexico City, Mexico: At least seven people were killed Monday when a small private jet crashed in central Mexico while attempting an emergency landing, Mexico State Civil Protection Coordinator Adrian Hernandez said. The accident occurred in San Mateo Atenco, an industrial area roughly 5 kilometers (3 miles) from Toluca International Airport, approximately 50 kilometers west of Mexico City. Officials said the jet was carrying 10 people, eight passengers and two crew members at the time of the crash. The aircraft, a privately owned jet, had departed earlier from Acapulco on Mexico’s Pacific coast and was en route to Toluca when it encountered apparent difficulties mid-flight. According to Adrián Hernández, coordinator of Mexico State Civil Protection, the jet was carrying eight passengers and two crew members at the time of the incident. Officials said the aircraft appeared to be attempting an emergency landing on a nearby open field when it instead struck the metal roof of a business structure, igniting a large fire that spread rapidly through the area. Several hours after the crash, authorities reported that seven bodies had been recovered from the wreckage. Recovery efforts are ongoing and officials have not yet commented on the status of any potentially missing occupants. Local emergency teams, including civil protection, firefighting units, and rescue personnel, responded swiftly to the scene. San Mateo Atenco Mayor Ana Muñiz confirmed that the blaze prompted the precautionary evacuation of around 130 people from nearby businesses. Federal and state aviation authorities have launched a formal investigation to determine the cause of the crash. No preliminary findings have been released.

Seven Dead After Private Jet Crashes While Attempting Emergency Landing In Mexico

December 16, 2025

Dulles, United States: A United Airlines Boeing 777 bound for Tokyo made an emergency return to Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) on Saturday, December 13, after experiencing an engine malfunction shortly after takeoff, officials confirmed. United Flight 803, operating a Boeing 777-200ER with 275 passengers and 15 crew members on board, departed Dulles around midday for Tokyo’s Haneda Airport when one of its engines lost power. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and airline spokespersons said the aircraft returned safely to the airport and landed without injury to any person on board. According to the FAA, the flight encountered a power loss in one engine shortly after departure. Visual footage shared on social media and confirmed by officials showed smoke near an airport runway after a part of the engine’s cowling separated and fell to the ground, igniting a patch of dry brush outside the runway perimeter. Fire crews on the ground quickly extinguished the blaze. Airport fire and rescue units inspected the aircraft after it returned, and operations at the affected runway were briefly paused before normal service resumed. United Airlines stated it would place passengers on a replacement aircraft later on Saturday to continue the scheduled flight to Tokyo. U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy confirmed that all passengers and crew disembarked safely and praised the crew’s conduct during the incident. The FAA has launched a formal investigation into the engine failure to determine the precise cause and ensure aviation safety protocols are upheld. An airport spokesperson reiterated that the emergency response was swift and effective, highlighting that the fire was contained quickly and no injuries were reported. United Airlines, in its statement, said it is cooperating fully with federal authorities to assess the mechanical issue. The airline also thanked emergency responders and airport personnel for their actions during the event.

United 777 Makes Emergency Return To Dulles After Engine Malfunction Post Takeoff

December 15, 2025

Ranchi, India: An IndiGo aircraft operating the Bhubaneswar–Ranchi sector experienced a tail strike while landing at Birsa Munda Airport on the evening of 12 December, officials confirmed. The incident caused a sudden jolt inside the cabin, but all passengers and crew were safe, with no reported injuries. Flight 6E‑7361, an ATR‑72 turboprop carrying about 70 passengers, made contact with the runway with its tail section during touchdown, according to airport authorities. Vinod Kumar, Ranchi Airport Director, confirmed that the impact was jolting but did not endanger passenger safety. “All passengers were safe. The aircraft sustained minor damage and has been grounded pending technical inspection,” Kumar stated. Following the incident, the aircraft was withdrawn from service after preliminary checks indicated it was unfit for further operations. The airline also cancelled the return flight from Ranchi to Bhubaneswar, offering passengers alternative arrangements or rescheduling options. Some passengers were transported by road to nearby destinations. Airport operations remained normal despite the incident. Aviation authorities and IndiGo’s technical team have launched an investigation to determine the cause of the tail strike, including factors such as aircraft configuration, weather conditions, or operational technique. Tail strikes occur when the rear portion of an aircraft contacts the runway during take-off or landing. While typically survivable, such incidents require detailed inspection to ensure structural and system integrity. In recent years, IndiGo has faced increased regulatory scrutiny over operational performance and safety standards, particularly amid widespread flight disruptions across its network. Earlier in March 2025, an IndiGo Airbus A321 operating Flight 6E‑5325 from Mumbai to Chennai also suffered a tail strike during landing at Chennai International Airport, when the aircraft’s empennage made contact with the runway surface. The aircraft was then grounded for technical inspection and necessary repairs, and the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) launched a formal investigation into the incident to determine contributing factors, including flight operations and aircraft handling.

IndiGo Flight Suffers Tail Strike During Landing At Ranchi Airport With No Injuries

December 15, 2025

Washington, United States: A JetBlue Airways flight en route from Curaçao to New York narrowly avoided a potentially catastrophic mid-air collision with a United States Air Force refueling tanker on Friday, according to pilot communications and official reports. JetBlue Flight B6-1112, operated by an Airbus A320, was climbing after departure from Curaçao, a Dutch Caribbean island near the Venezuelan coast, when the flight crew reported a U.S. Air Force air-to-air refueling tanker crossing directly into their flight path at a similar altitude. Air traffic control recordings indicate the commercial jet halted its ascent to maintain separation. In audio released by air traffic control, the JetBlue pilot is heard saying, “We almost had a midair collision up here,” adding that the tanker aircraft had “passed directly in our flight path … they don’t have their transponder turned on.” The absence of a functioning transponder meant the military aircraft was not visible on civilian radar systems, complicating the air traffic controller’s ability to track it. The flight crew followed established safety procedures to avoid the tanker and later reported the incident to federal aviation authorities. JetBlue spokesperson Derek Dombrowski confirmed the airline had “reported this incident to federal authorities and will participate in any investigation,” praising the crew for their prompt action. Despite the close encounter, no injuries were reported, and Flight 1112 continued on to New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport, where it landed without further incident. The Pentagon declined to provide immediate comment, referring inquiries to the U.S. Air Force, which had not offered an official statement at the time of publication. Aviation safety experts note that military aircraft occasionally operate with transponders off during specific missions, but this practice poses risks in airspaces shared with civilian traffic. This incident occurs against a backdrop of heightened U.S. military activity in the Caribbean, including intensified drug interdiction flights and pressure on neighboring Venezuela.

JetBlue Flight Avoids Near Mid-Air Collision With U.S. Air Force Tanker Aircraft

December 15, 2025

New Delhi, India: British Airways has announced a strategic expansion of its operations in India, reinforcing its commitment to one of the world’s fastest‑growing aviation markets and deepening ties between the United Kingdom and India. The airline confirmed plans to enhance its India‑UK connectivity with expanded flight frequencies, service upgrades, and broader market engagement, reflecting rising travel demand and the nation’s increasing importance as a global travel hub. British Airways plans to introduce a third daily service between London Heathrow and New Delhi starting in 2026, pending regulatory and slot approvals. Currently, the carrier operates two daily flights on the Delhi–London sector alongside multiple services to other Indian cities, including Mumbai, Chennai, Bengaluru and Hyderabad. The additional daily frequency is part of a broader expansion strategy aimed at supporting growing passenger traffic between India and the UK, particularly for business, education and leisure travel. In parallel with network growth, British Airways is reintroducing its First Class cabin on select Mumbai services and plans to deploy its latest Club Suite business‑class product across all major India routes by the end of 2026. These enhancements signal a targeted effort to elevate the customer experience and cater to premium travel demand. Industry observers note that such product upgrades align with broader trends in international long‑haul markets, where passenger expectations for comfort and service are rising, particularly on transcontinental routes. British Airways executives have described India as one of the airline’s most dynamic and strategically important markets, second only to the United States in terms of overall demand. The expansion reflects enduring bilateral links and increased economic interaction following the UK‑India Free Trade Agreement signed earlier this year. Beyond connectivity, the airline’s engagement extends to local employment and infrastructure, with facilities such as customer support centres in Gurugram that underscore long‑term commercial commitment. India’s aviation sector continues to grow robustly, recently ranking as the world’s fifth largest aviation market with over 240 million passengers in 2024, according to International Air Transport Association data, a testament to strong domestic and international travel demand. Industry expansion is not limited to foreign carriers. Indian airlines like IndiGo and Air India have also been scaling international operations, including new long‑haul services to Europe and beyond, intensifying global connectivity. With accelerating global mobility, British Airways’ expanded footprint in India represents a calculated growth strategy designed to capture rising demand on one of the world’s most vibrant aviation stages. By augmenting flight frequencies, enriching onboard products and bolstering customer support infrastructure, the airline aims to reinforce its competitive positioning while strengthening UK‑India travel and trade links.

British Airways Plans Major Expansion In India’s Growing Aviation Market By 2026

December 14, 2025

Auckland, New Zealand: Menzies Aviation Limited, a key ground-handling provider at Auckland Airport, has been ordered by the Auckland High Court to pay a $150,000 penalty for breaching New Zealand’s Biosecurity Act, following enforcement action by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI). The court ruling stems from compliance failures identified at two MPI-approved transitional facilities where Menzies handles imported air freight, containers and associated packaging. Transitional facilities are critical checkpoints where incoming goods are cleared of potential biological threats before entering the domestic supply chain. MPI’s investigation found that on follow-up inspections, six consignments of uncleared risk goods were not properly wrapped in plastic, leaving gaps through which unwanted pests could escape. Inspectors also reported that the primary inspection room did not meet required hygiene standards and was not fit for purpose. Additionally, no biosecurity response equipment was present, and records documenting cleaning and staff training were either incomplete or absent. MPI Regional Manager for Investigations North, Aleshea Allen, emphasised the seriousness of the breach, noting that such failures create “a potential biosecurity risk at our border.” Allen reiterated that all operators handling imported goods are expected to fully comply with mandatory requirements set out under the Biosecurity Act. In announcing the penalty, the High Court highlighted that Menzies had failed to comply with a formal compliance order previously issued by MPI marking the first occasion a pecuniary penalty has been sought under the Biosecurity Act. Although Menzies’ non-compliance was not judged to be deliberate, the court upheld the need for deterrence and accountability. In a statement to the NZ Herald, a spokesperson for Menzies Aviation acknowledged the court’s ruling, noting that deficiencies occurred during a period when staffing challenges persisted in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The company confirmed that corrective measures were implemented well before the court decision and that biosecurity training and processes have since been strengthened. MPI Biosecurity New Zealand Manager Paul Hallett stressed the high stakes of biosecurity compliance, pointing to the risk of invasive pests such as brown marmorated stink bug, ants or moth species all of which have the potential to damage New Zealand’s horticulture and wider economy if inadvertently introduced. Under the Biosecurity Act 1993, corporations can face fines of up to $200,000 for offences related to non-compliance with section 154 obligations, depending on the nature of the breach. The Act forms a central pillar of New Zealand’s border protection system, designed to prevent the introduction of organisms that could threaten indigenous species, agriculture and public health.

Auckland High Court Penalises Menzies Aviation $150,000 Over Biosecurity Failures

December 13, 2025

New Delhi, India: India’s Civil Aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), has dismissed four senior flight operations inspectors amid ongoing operational disruptions at IndiGo, the country’s largest airline, underscoring heightened regulatory scrutiny in the wake of a pilot staffing crisis that has triggered widespread flight cancellations across the domestic network. The DGCA acted on Friday after concluding that the inspectors tasked with monitoring safety and compliance at IndiGo failed to adequately oversee the airline’s preparedness, particularly in ensuring sufficient cockpit crew in line with newly implemented duty and rest norms. In a related move, DGCA teams have been deployed to IndiGo’s headquarters in Gurugram, where officials are monitoring daily operations including crew deployment, flight cancellations, unplanned pilot leave and passenger refunds. These teams are required to submit daily reports to the regulator as the investigation continues. The regulatory action follows a series of disruptions that began in early December, when IndiGo began cancelling large numbers of flights reportedly thousands nationwide after tighter Flight Duty Time Limitation (FDTL) rules came into full effect on November 1. These rules, designed to extend mandatory rest periods and limit duty hours for pilots, significantly reduced the number of permissible night landings and imposed greater rest requirements. Parliamentary data indicates IndiGo’s pilot count dropped to approximately 5,085 by early December, down from around 5,463 in March 2025, exacerbating the strain on flight operations as rest norms tightened. Industry and pilot association sources have criticised IndiGo’s staffing strategy, arguing that the airline did not hire sufficient pilots or adjust crew rostering in anticipation of the FDTL rules, despite a two‑year preparatory window. The Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) described the airline’s approach as a “prolonged and unorthodox lean manpower strategy,” contending it worsened the impact of the new norms. Earlier in a significant regulatory intervention, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has ordered IndiGo to cut approximately 10 % of its winter flight schedule, a move that could result in more than 200 fewer daily operations for India’s largest carrier as it grapples with widespread cancellations and pilot staffing shortfalls. The directive comes after an intensive review of the airline’s ability to operate the winter schedule safely and reliably amid ongoing disruptions that began in early December, with regulators finding that IndiGo had “not demonstrated an ability to operate these schedules efficiently.” Under the new order, the airline has been instructed to revise its winter roster and scale down services, particularly on routes where alternative options exist, in a bid to stabilise operations through the winter period that runs until late March 2026. The reduction is part of broader oversight action by DGCA, which has also deployed monitoring teams and summoned the airline’s senior management to explain its operational planning. In a further escalation, the DGCA has summoned IndiGo CEO Pieter Elbers to appear before an investigative panel on December 12 to explain the airline’s planning and management of its flight operations during the crisis. Elbers previously appeared before the panel, which is also examining manpower planning, rostering systems and compliance readiness under the FDTL framework. To address the pilot shortage, IndiGo has submitted a comprehensive manpower plan to the regulator, outlining targets to expand its flight crew through both domestic recruitment and the hiring of expatriate pilots. The airline aims to recruit several hundred additional captains and first officers by early 2026. Civil Aviation Minister K. Ram Mohan Naidu has publicly rejected claims that regulatory oversight lapses caused the disruptions, placing primary responsibility on IndiGo’s internal management and rostering failures. He also highlighted the need for broader structural reforms in India’s aviation sector to prevent over‑reliance on a single major carrier. The crisis has intensified debate over airline preparedness, regulatory implementation and passenger rights, with government officials, industry analysts and pilots weighing in on both operational planning failures and the challenges posed by the new safety‑oriented duty norms.

DGCA Dismisses Four IndiGo Inspectors And Summons CEO As Flight Disruptions Continue

December 12, 2025

Washington, United States: The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has issued formal guidance stating that airlines are not required to provide passengers with out-of-pocket compensation, such as meals or hotel stays, when flight cancellations or extended delays result from aircraft recalls rather than airline operational issues. The guidance, released on Wednesday, responds to widespread travel disruptions that occurred during the busy Thanksgiving period after carriers worldwide were compelled to perform immediate inspections and software updates on Airbus A320-family aircraft. Approximately 6,000 aircraft were affected by the recall, which followed an incident in October involving a JetBlue flight that experienced a rapid, uncommanded drop in altitude, injuring at least 15 passengers. Airbus attributed the event to a software anomaly linked to the airplane’s flight-control systems. Under current U.S. regulations, airlines must fully refund passengers when a flight is canceled for any reason, including equipment recalls. However, DOT regulations do not mandate reimbursement for ancillary expenses such as lodging and meals for delays or cancellations beyond an airline’s control. The new guidance underscores that recall-related disruptions fall into this category. While the DOT does not compel carriers to cover such costs, many major U.S. airlines maintain voluntary customer service policies that provide varying degrees of compensation when delays or cancellations are due to circumstances within the airline’s operational control such as crew shortages or mechanical failures. For example, several carriers offer meal vouchers or hotel coverage when delays extend beyond set thresholds for controllable events. However, the DOT’s recent clarification specifies that aircraft recalls are not considered within an airline’s control, meaning those voluntary commitments are not triggered by recall-related disruptions. Airlines remain free to offer accommodations or other benefits at their discretion. The guidance comes amid broader shifts in federal airline consumer protection policy. In September 2025, the DOT under the current administration withdrew a Biden-era proposal that would have required airlines to pay passengers for certain lengthy delays and cancellations, aligning U.S. protections more closely with standards in the European Union and other jurisdictions. Officials framed the move as consistent with broader regulatory priorities focused on reducing economic burdens on industry. Consumer advocacy groups have raised concerns that the absence of mandatory compensation for extra-contractual expenses may leave passengers vulnerable to significant out-of-pocket costs following large-scale operational disruptions. Airlines and industry trade associations, conversely, argue that rigid compensation mandates could inflate fares and constrain carrier flexibility, particularly in responding to safety-driven directives from regulators like the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). As the 2025 holiday travel season progresses, both passengers and carriers continue navigating the operational challenges triggered by the Airbus software recall and its cascading effects on flight schedules.

DOT Declares Airlines Not Liable For Passenger Costs After Airbus Recall Disruptions

December 12, 2025

London, United Kingdom: A British Airways Airbus A380 operating flight BA285 en route from London Heathrow to San Francisco was forced to turn back to the UK after the crew identified a technical issue mid-flight, authorities and flight tracking data confirm. The double-deck superjumbo, registered as G-XLEK, departed Heathrow at approximately 11:43 GMT on Wednesday for the scheduled transatlantic service. Around four hours into the planned 10-hour journey, the flight began holding over northern UK airspace near Scotland and released fuel over a remote area off the west coast, a standard aviation practice to safely reduce landing weight. Flight tracking services showed BA285 circling at multiple flight levels for more than an hour before crews initiated the return to Heathrow. During this period the aircraft also became one of the most-tracked flights globally on FlightRadar24, highlighting the unusual nature of the diversion. British Airways subsequently confirmed the aircraft touched back down at Heathrow later the same day without declaring an emergency. In a statement to media, the airline said the diversion was due to a technical issue with the aircraft’s communication system and stressed that all on board landed safely with no injuries reported. Passengers affected by the disruption are being assisted with rebooking and ground support. The airline has apologised to customers for the inconvenience and encouraged travellers to check flight status information via official channels. A few days ago on December 8, a British Airways Airbus A320 flight from Edinburgh to London declared a mid-air emergency and returned safely to Edinburgh Airport earlier this week, after pilots reported a landing gear malfunction shortly after departure. Flight BA1443, bound for Heathrow, issued the internationally recognised 7700 emergency squawk code minutes after takeoff when the aircraft’s landing gear failed to retract properly, prompting the crew to hold over Stirling while troubleshooting before returning and landing without incident. The unscheduled return led Edinburgh Airport to temporarily suspend incoming and outgoing flights, with several services diverted to nearby airports during the disruption. No injuries were reported, and British Airways apologised to affected passengers as operations resumed after the technical issue was resolved.

British Airways A380 Returns To Heathrow After Mid-Flight Technical Issue

December 12, 2025

« Previous Page1 … Page86 Page87 Page88 Page89 Page90 … Page151 Next »

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

AVIATION TODAY brings the latest in aviation and aims to cater information to professionals and Aviation Enthusiasts about the Industry.

Quick Links

About Us
Contact Us
Services
Advertise
FAQ

Navigate

Latest News
Civil Aviation
Pilot Training
Flight School Analysis
Aviation Jobs
Training

General Support

info@aviationtoday.in

News Desk Support

news@aviationtoday.in

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer

About Us
Latest News
Aviation Today Perspectives
Aviation Jobs
Contact Us
Advertisement

Aviation Newsletter

Facebook Instagram Linkedin X-twitter Youtube